Document punctuation has been preserved.
| № | Criteria for evaluating the answer to task C1 | Points |
I |
||
K1 |
Statement of source text problems |
|
| The examinee (in one form or another in any part of the essay) correctly formulated one of the problems of the original text. There are no factual errors related to the understanding and formulation of the problem. |
1 | |
| The examinee could not correctly formulate any of the problems of the source text. |
0 | |
K2 |
Commentary on the formulated problem of the original text |
|
|
The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. The examinee gave at least 2 examples from the read text that are important for understanding the problem. |
3 | |
|
The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. The examinee gave 1 example from the read text, which is important for understanding the problem. |
2 | |
|
The problem of the text formulated by the examiner is commented on based on the source text, but the examinee did not give a single example from the read text that is important for understanding the problem, or one factual error was made in the comment related to understanding the problem of the original text |
1 | |
|
The problem formulated by the examiner is not commented or commented without relying on the original text, or there is more than one factual error in the comment related to the understanding of the original text, or commented another, |
0 | |
K3 |
Reflection of the position of the author of the original text |
|
|
The examinee correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text on the commented problem. |
1 | |
| The position of the author of the original text by the examinee is formulated incorrectly, or the position of the author of the original text is not formulated |
0 | |
K4 |
Argumentation by the examinees of their own opinion on the problem |
|
|
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (given at least 2 arguments, one of which was taken from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature) |
3 | |
|
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (given at least 2 arguments, based on knowledge, life experience), or cited only 1 argument from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature |
2 | |
|
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (given 1 argument), based on knowledge, life experience |
1 | |
| The examinee formulated his opinion on the problem posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), but did not give arguments, or the opinion of the examinee is stated only formally (for example: “I agree / disagree with the author”), or the opinion of the examinee is not reflected at all in the work |
0 | |
II |
Speech design of the essay |
|
K5 |
Semantic integrity, speech coherence and sequence of presentation |
|
|
The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, speech coherence and sequence of presentation: |
2 | |
|
The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, |
1 | |
|
In the work of the examinee, a communicative intent is visible, but more than one logical error was made, and/or there are two cases of violation of paragraph articulation of the text |
0 | |
K6 |
Accuracy and expressiveness of speech |
|
| The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, the variety of the grammatical structure of speech. *The highest score for this criterion is received by the examinee only if the highest score is obtained according to the criterion K10 |
2 | |
|
The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, but the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech is traced, or the work of the examinee is characterized by a variety of grammatical structure of speech, but there are violations of the accuracy of the expression of thought |
1 | |
| The work of the examinee is distinguished by the poverty of the dictionary and the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech. | 0 | |
III |
Literacy |
|
K7 |
Compliance with spelling rules |
|
| no spelling errors (or 1 minor error) | 3 | |
| no more than 2 errors were made | 2 | |
| made 3-4 mistakes | 1 | |
| more than 4 mistakes made |
0 | |
K8 |
Compliance with punctuation rules |
|
| no punctuation errors (or 1 minor error) | 3 | |
| 1-3 mistakes made | 2 | |
| 4-5 mistakes made | 1 | |
| more than 5 mistakes made |
0 | |
K9 |
Language Compliance |
|
| no grammatical errors | 2 | |
| 1-2 mistakes made | 1 | |
| more than 2 mistakes made |
0 | |
K10 |
Compliance with speech norms |
|
| no more than 1 speech error | 2 | |
| made 2-3 mistakes | 1 | |
| more than 3 mistakes made |
0 | |
K11 |
Ethical Compliance |
|
| there are no ethical errors in the work | 1 | |
| ethical mistakes made (1 or more) |
0 | |
K12. |
Maintain factual accuracy in background material |
|
| there are no factual errors in the background material | 1 | |
| factual errors (1 or more) in the background material |
0 | |
| The maximum score for the entire written work(K1-K12) | 24 |
When assessing literacy (K7-K10), the volume of the essay 1 should be taken into account.
1. The assessment standards indicated in the table are designed for an essay of 150-300 words 2 .
2. If the essay contains less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and 0 points are assessed, the task is considered failed.
When evaluating an essay with a volume of 70 to 150 words, the number of permissible errors of four types (K7-K10) decreases.
2 points for these criteria are given in the following cases:
K7 - there are no spelling errors (or one minor mistake was made);
K8 - there are no punctuation errors (or one minor mistake was made). 1 point according to these criteria is given in the following cases:
K7 - no more than two errors were made;
K8 - one - three mistakes were made;
K9 - no grammatical errors;
K10 - no more than one speech error was made.
The highest score according to the K7-K12 criteria for a work of 70 to 150 words is not set.
If the essay is a paraphrase or a completely rewritten source text without any comments, then such work for all aspects of the test (K1-K12) is estimated at 0 points.
If a work that is a rewritten or paraphrased source text contains fragments of text
examiner, then the test takes into account only the number of words that belong to the examinee.
A work written without relying on the text read (not on this text) is not evaluated.
1 When counting words, both independent and auxiliary parts of speech are taken into account.
Any sequence of words written without a space is counted (for example, "after all" - one word, "yet" - two words). Initials with a surname are considered one word (for example, "M.Yu. Lermontov" - one word). Any other characters, in particular numbers, are not taken into account when calculating (for example, "5 years" - one word, "five years" - two
the words).
2 If the essay contains a partially or completely rewritten text of the review of task 24 and / or information about the author of the text by the examinee, then the volume of such work is determined without taking into account the text of the review and / or information about the author of the text.
In accordance with the Procedure for conducting the state final certification for educational programs middle general education(Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated December 26, 2013 No. 1400 was registered by the Ministry of Justice of Russia on February 3, 2014 No. 31205)
“61. Based on the results of the first and second checks, experts independently assign points for each answer to the tasks of the USE examination paper with a detailed answer ...
62. In the event of a significant discrepancy in the scores given by two experts, a third test is scheduled. Significant discrepancy in points is determined in the assessment criteria for the corresponding academic subject.
The expert who carries out the third check is provided with information about the scores given by the experts who previously checked the examination paper.
How the results of the exam are evaluated
The results of the Unified State Examination are evaluated on a 100-point scale and put up in a special "Certificate of the results of the unified state exam."
When evaluating USE results set the minimum number of test scores for each educational subject confirming that the graduate has mastered the basic general education programs of secondary (complete) education in accordance with the requirements of the federal educational standard secondary (complete) general education. If the student scored less than the established minimum number of points (did not overcome the minimum threshold), then the exam is considered not passed.
The value of the minimum threshold is announced within 6-8 days after conducting the exam on the subject in the main terms and 2-3 days after the exam in additional terms in July.
USE assessment scale
When you complete tasks on the exam, 1 or more points are awarded for each correct solution, depending on the complexity. At the same time, a correctly completed task of part A or B is estimated at 1 point, part C - up to 4 points. The sum of these scores is called the Primary Score (PB). In fact, this is the number of correctly completed tasks.
- The number of minimum PBs for different subjects may vary, for example:
- mathematics: 36 PB,
- biology: 36 PB,
- foreign languages: 22 PB.
But these are not the points that will be useful to you, for example, for entering a university. They need to be translated on a 100-point scale. This is the so-called "test score" (TB).
TB assesses the level of preparedness of the student. It depends on the level of difficulty of the completed tasks on the exam. This score is used to determine the final grade. The maximum test score for the exam in any subject: 100 points.
The primary score is converted into a test score using a special formula.
Table for converting USE-2020 scores into grades (according to a five-point system)
|
Subject |
||||
|
Russian language |
||||
|
Mathematics profile |
||||
|
Mathematics basic |
||||
|
Biology |
||||
|
Geography |
||||
|
Social science |
||||
|
Literature |
||||
|
Informatics and ICT |
||||
|
Spanish |
- Minimum USE scores for graduation in 2020:
- Russian language - 24 points;
- basic level mathematics - 3 points (assessment);
- physics - 36 points;
- chemistry - 36 points;
- biology - 36 points;
- history - 32 points;
- geography - 37 points;
- social science - 42 points;
- literature - 32 points;
- Chinese- 17 points.
- Minimum USE scores for admission to a university:
- Russian language - 36 points;
- maths profile level- 27 points;
- physics - 36 points;
- chemistry - 36 points;
- computer science and information and communication technologies (ICT) - 40 points;
- biology - 36 points;
- history - 32 points;
- geography - 37 points;
- social science - 42 points;
- literature - 32 points;
- foreign languages (English, French, German, Spanish) - 22 points.
How the exam affects the receipt of a certificate
The basis for issuing a certificate of secondary education to a graduate is the satisfactory results of the Unified State Examination, i.e., the number of points is not lower than the minimum threshold in compulsory subjects (Russian language and mathematics). In this case, the graduate receives 2 documents: a school certificate and a certificate of USE results.
The final grades are set in the certificate according to the traditional 5-point system, which are defined as the arithmetic mean of the graduate's annual grades for grades 10-11 (12).
The results of the USE do not affect the final grades given in the certificate.
If a graduate has not overcome the minimum threshold in one of the subjects - Russian language or mathematics - at the Unified State Examination in the main terms and during the retake, then a certificate is not issued to him.
How and when you can find out the results of the exam
The results of the exam must be known to the participants no later than 3 working days after Rosobrnadzor announces the minimum thresholds for each of the subjects. Thus, no more than 12 days pass from the date of the exam. Most regions inform their USE participants at an earlier date.
For USE participants - graduates of the current year, certificates of USE results are issued at an educational institution. The rest of the USE participants will find out their results where they received a pass for the USE: this is either the PES in which they took the exam, or the education authority of the constituent entity of the Russian Federation, local education authorities.
According to the current regulations, each subject of the Russian Federation is independently responsible for informing USE participants about the results. In some regions, this information can be accessed online for free. You can find out your results by having an individual code (passport number, etc.).
- Moscow and Moscow region: www.rcoi.net
- St. Petersburg and Leningrad region: ege.spb.ru
Lists of USE participants with their exam results are posted on information stands (at school, PES, education authority, etc.).
Validity of the certificate of the results of the exam
On November 20, 2013, letter No. DL-345/17 of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation “On the effect of the USE results” was published.
"The Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation on the issue of the validity of the results of the unified state exam obtained before entry into force on September 1, 2013. federal law dated December 29, 2012 No. 273-FZ “On education in Russian Federation(hereinafter referred to as the Federal Law), informs.
According to Part 2 of Article 70 of the Federal Law, the results of the unified state examination for admission to study in undergraduate and specialist programs valid for four years following the year in which such results were obtained.
Therefore, admission to organizations that carry out educational activities for bachelor's and specialist's programs, is allowed based on the results of the unified state exam, confirmed by certificates of the USE issued in 2015 and 2016, and valid until the end of 2019 and 2020, respectively
The USE certificate after September 1, 2020 is valid for four years following the year the exam was taken. That is, the certificate of 2018 expires in December 2022 and can be used for admission to universities in the period from 2018 to 2022. Therefore, certificates issued in 2019 and 2020 are valid until 2023 and 2024, respectively.
2018-2019 academic year will be graduation for many Russian schoolchildren who are already concerned about the successful completion of the Unified State Exam and successful admission to a good university.
We will tell you how exam papers are checked in various subjects, how the scale for converting USE scores into grades works, and what innovations can be expected in 2019.
Principles for evaluating the work of the USE 2019
For several recent years the USE system in a number of subjects has undergone significant changes and has been brought to the optimal (according to the organizers) format, which makes it possible to fully assess the amount of knowledge of a graduate in a particular subject.
No fundamental changes are expected in 2018-2019, and we can say with confidence that the same principles will be applied to evaluate the work of graduates as in 2017-2018:
- automated verification of forms;
- involvement of experts in checking tasks with detailed answers.
How does the computer evaluate?
The first part of the examination paper involves a short answer to the questions posed, which the USE participant must enter in a special answer form.
Important! Before starting the work, be sure to read the rules for filling out the form, as an incorrectly executed work will not pass an automated check.
It is quite difficult to challenge the result of a computer check. If the work was not counted due to the fault of the participant who incorrectly filled out the form, the result is equated to unsatisfactory.
How do experts evaluate?
In many subjects, in addition to the test part, there are tasks that require a full detailed answer. Since it is impossible to automate the process of checking such answers, experts are involved in the verification - experienced teachers with a long work experience.
When checking the exam, the teacher does not know (and even with a strong desire cannot find out) whose work lies in front of him and in which city (region) it was written. Verification is carried out on the basis of uniform assessment criteria developed specifically for each subject. Each work is checked by two experts. If the experts agree, the assessment is put on the form, but if independent appraisers disagree, then a third expert is involved in the verification, whose opinion will be decisive.
That is why it is important to write legibly and accurately so that there is no ambiguous interpretation of words and phrases.
Primary and test scores
Based on the results of the test, the USE participant is awarded a certain number of primary points, which are then transferred to text (points for the entire test). AT different subjects a different maximum of primary points is provided, depending on the number of tasks. But after bringing the result according to the corresponding table, the USE participant receives the final test score, which is the official result of his final tests (maximum 100 points).
So, in order to pass the exam, it is enough to score the established minimum threshold for the initial score:
Minimum points |
||
primary | test |
|
Russian language | ||
Mathematics (profile) | ||
Informatics | ||
Social science | ||
Foreign languages | ||
Biology | ||
Geography | ||
Literature | ||
Focusing on these numbers, you can accurately understand that the exam has been passed. But what kind of assessment? The online scale of 2018 will help you with this, designed specifically for converting primary USE scores into test ones, which will also be relevant for the results of 2019. A handy calculator can be found on the website 4ege.ru.
Announcement of official results
Graduates are always concerned about the question - how quickly can you find out what result was obtained when passing and what will be the scale for converting points scored on the exam into traditional grades in 2019.
Teachers are often taken to reassure students by working through the tasks of the USE tickets immediately after the exam and evaluating the quality of the work done by the pupils and the amount of primary points scored. Official results must be expected for 8-14 days, according to the established regulations for the USE-2019. On average, the organizers approve the following inspection schedules:
- 3 days to check the work;
- 5-6 days for information processing at the federal level;
- 1 working day to approve the results of the SEC;
- 3 days to post results online and transfer data to educational institutions.
In the event of unforeseen situations and technical problems, these terms may be revised.
You can find out the owl score:
- directly at your school;
- on the check.ege.edu.ru portal;
- on the gosuslugi.ru website.
Converting points to grade
Since 2009, the results of the USE have not been included in the graduate certificate. Therefore, today there is no official state system for translating the USE result into an assessment on a school 5-point scale. As part of the introductory campaign, the test score scored in the exam is always summed up and taken into account. But, many students are still interested to know how they passed the exam - 3 or 4, 4 or 5. For this, there is a special table that details the correspondence for each of the 100 points for each of the subjects.
Russian language | ||||
Maths | ||||
Informatics | ||||
Social science | ||||
Foreign languages | ||||
Biology | ||||
Geography | ||||
Literature | ||||
Using such a table is quite inconvenient. It is much easier to find out how you passed the Russian language, mathematics or history using the 4ege.ru online calculator, which also contains the USE score conversion scale, which is relevant for 2019 graduates.
Having received the result of the exam, it is worth deciding on the university as soon as possible, comparing your capabilities with the real competition for the specialties of interest. Thus, the practice of past years shows that in some cases it is difficult to get into the most popular areas in the capital's universities even with high scores, because not only the winners of the 100-point USE results, but also the winners of the largest Olympiads of the 2018-2019 academic year will compete for places.
USE -2019. Russian language
Evaluation criteria and points.
Part 1.
Attention!
A step-by-step explanation of each part of the composition is given, examples of writing these parts are given.
Material can be found on my website.esse-ege.ru
Part 2.
|
|
Criteria for evaluating the answer to task 27 |
Points |
|
I |
Essay content |
|
|
Statement of source text problems |
|
|
|
|
The examinee (in one form or another in any part of the essay) correctly formulated one of the problems of the original text. Factual errors related to understanding and problem statement, no. |
1 |
|
|
The examinee could not correctly formulate any of the problems of the source text. * If the examiner has not formulated or formulated incorrectly (in one form or another in any of the parts of the essay) one of the problems of the source text, then such work according to the criteria K1-K4 is estimated at 0 points |
0 |
|
K2 |
Commentary on the formulated problem of the original text |
|
|
|
Problem formulated by the examinee commented based on the original text. The examinee gave at least 2 examples-illustrations from the read text that are important for understanding the problem. An explanation is given for the 2 given examples. The semantic connection between them is revealed. There are no factual errors related to understanding the problem of the original text in the comment. |
5 |
|
|
The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. The examinee gave at least 2 examples-illustrations from the read text that are important for understanding the problem. An explanation is given for the 2 examples given, but no semantic connection between them is revealed, or a semantic connection between the examples is revealed, but an explanation is given for only one example. There are no factual errors related to understanding the problem of the original text in the comment. |
4 |
|
|
The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. The examinee gave at least 2 examples-illustrations from the read text that are important for understanding the problem, but only one example was explained, the semantic connection between the examples was not revealed, or the examinee gave 1 example-illustration from the read text, important for understanding the problem, and gave an explanation to it. There are no factual errors related to understanding the problem of the original text in the comment. |
3 |
|
|
The examinee gave 2 examples-illustrations from the read text that are important for understanding the problem, but did not explain their meaning |
2 |
|
|
The examinee gave 1 example-illustration from the read text, which is important for understanding the problem, but did not explain its meaning |
1 |
|
|
Examples-illustrations from the read text that are important for understanding the problem are not given, or the problem is commented without relying on the source text, or The comment contains factual errors (one or more) related to the understanding of the source text, or Another problem not formulated by the examinee is commented, or instead of a comment, a simple retelling of the text is given, or instead of a comment, a large fragment of the source text is quoted. |
0 |
|
K 3 |
|
|
|
|
The examinee correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text on the commented problem. There are no actual errors related to understanding the position of the author of the source text. |
1 |
|
|
or |
0 |
|
K 4 |
|
|
|
|
The examinee expressed his attitude to the position of the author of the text on the problem (agreeing or disagreeing with the author) and substantiated it. |
1 |
|
|
The examinee did not express his attitude to the position of the author of the text, or The examinee's thoughts do not correspond to the formulated problem, or the examinee's opinion is stated only formally (for example, "I agree / disagree with the author") |
0 |
|
II |
Speech design of the essay |
|
|
K5 |
Semantic integrity, speech coherence and sequencing |
|
|
|
integrity, speech coherence and consistency of presentation: - there are no logical errors, the sequence of presentation is not violated; – there are no violations of paragraph articulation of the text in the work |
2 |
|
|
The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, but one logical error and/or there is one violation of paragraph articulation of the text in the work |
1 |
|
|
In the work of the examinee, a communicative intent is visible, but more than one logical error was made, and/or there are two cases of violation of paragraph articulation of the text |
0 |
|
K 6 |
Accuracy and expressiveness of speech |
|
|
|
The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, the variety of the grammatical structure of speech. * The candidate receives the highest score for this criterion only if the highest score is obtained for the criterion K10 |
2 |
|
|
The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, but the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech is traced, or the work of the examinee is characterized by a variety of grammatical structure of speech, but there are violations of the accuracy of the expression of thought |
1 |
|
|
The work of the examinee is distinguished by the poverty of the dictionary and the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech. |
0 |
|
III |
Literacy |
|
|
K 7 |
Compliance with spelling rules |
|
|
|
There are no spelling errors (or one non-rough error) |
3 |
|
|
No more than two mistakes made |
2 |
|
|
Made three or four mistakes |
1 |
|
|
More than four mistakes made |
0 |
|
K 8 |
Compliance with punctuation rules |
|
|
|
There are no punctuation errors (or one minor mistake was made) |
3 |
|
|
One to three mistakes made |
2 |
|
|
Made four or five mistakes |
1 |
|
|
More than five mistakes made |
0 |
|
By 9 |
Compliance language norms |
|
|
|
There are no grammatical errors |
2 |
|
|
Made one or two mistakes |
1 |
|
|
More than two mistakes made |
0 |
|
K10 |
Compliance with speech norms |
|
|
|
No more than one spelling error |
2 |
|
|
Made two or three mistakes |
1 |
|
|
More than three mistakes made |
0 |
|
K11 |
Ethical Compliance |
1 |
|
|
There are no ethical errors in the work |
0 |
|
|
Ethical errors made (one or more) |
|
|
K12 |
Maintain factual accuracy in background material |
|
|
|
There are no actual errors in the background material |
1 |
|
|
There are factual errors (one or more) in the background material |
0 |
|
Maximum points for the entire written work (K1-K12) |
24 |
|
When assessing literacy (K7-K10), the volume of the essay should be taken into account. The assessment standards indicated in the table are designed for an essay with a volume of 150–300 words .
If in an essay less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and 0 points are assessed, the task is considered unfulfilled.
When evaluating an essay by volume 70 to 150 words the number of permissible errors of four types (K7–K10) is decreasing.
2 points for these criteria
K7- there are no spelling errors (or one minor mistake was made);
K8- there are no punctuation errors (or one minor mistake was made).
1 point for these criteria placed in the following cases:
K7- no more than two errors were made;
K8- one or three errors were made;
K9- there are no grammatical errors;
K10- No more than one speech error was made.
Highest mark according to K7–K12 criteria for work with a volume from 70 to 150 words is not put.
If the essay is a paraphrase or a complete rewrite of the original text without any comments, then
such work on all aspects of the audit (K1-K12) is assessed 0 points.
If in a work that is rewritten or paraphrased original text, contains fragments of the text of the examinee, then only the number of words that belongs to the examinee is taken into account during the check.
Work written without reading text(not in this text) not evaluated .
Below are the criteria for evaluating an essay (essay) at the Unified State Examination in the Russian language for 2020. In the new Russian language demos 2020 evaluation criteria have been changed K2 and K4.
What can give the most points:
- 5 points - for a comment on the source text problem - K2
- 3 points - for literacy: spelling (K7) and punctuation (K8)
Arguing your own opinion on the problem - REMOVED in 2019!
Maximum for writing you can get 24 points.
Criteria for evaluating the answer to task 27
K1 Statement of source text problems
- 1 point The examinee (in one form or another in any part of the essay) correctly formulated one of the problems of the original text. There are no factual errors related to the understanding and formulation of the problem.
- 0 points. The examinee could not correctly formulate any of the problems of the source text. *If the examinee did not formulate or formulated incorrectly (in one form or another in any part of the essay) one of the problems of the source text, then such a work according to the criteria K1-K4 is estimated at 0 points
K2 Commentary on the formulated problem of the original text
- 5 points. 2 illustration examples from the read text, important for understanding the problem. An explanation is given for the 2 given examples. The semantic connection between them is revealed. There are no factual errors related to understanding the problem of the original text in the comment.
- 4 points. The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. The examinee brought at least 2 illustration examples from the read text, important for understanding the problem. An explanation is given for the 2 examples given, but there is no meaningful relationship between them,
or the semantic connection between the examples was revealed, but only one example is explained. There are no factual errors related to understanding the problem of the original text in the comment - 3 points. The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. The examinee brought at least 2 illustration examples but an explanation is given for only one example, the semantic connection between the examples is not revealed, or the examinee brought 1 illustration example from the read text, important for understanding the problem, and gave an explanation to it, or led 2 illustration examples from the read text, important for understanding the problem, but did not explain their meaning. The semantic connection between examples-illustrations is indicated.
There are no factual errors related to understanding the problem of the original text in the comment. - 2 points. Examinee led 2 illustration examples from the read text, important for understanding the problem, but did not explain their meaning. The semantic connection between the examples-illustrations was not revealed.
- 1 point Examinee led 1 illustration example from the read text, important for understanding the problem, but did not explain its meaning.
- 0 points. Examples-illustrations from the read text that are important for understanding the problem are not given, or the problem is commented without relying on the source text, or the comment contains factual errors (one or more) related to the understanding of the source text, or commented on another problem not formulated by the examiner, or instead of a comment, a simple retelling of the text is given, or instead of a comment, a large fragment of the source text is quoted.
K3 Reflection of the position of the author of the original text
- 1 point The examinee correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text on the commented problem. There are no actual errors related to understanding the position of the author of the source text.
- 0 points. The position of the author of the original text by the examinee is formulated incorrectly, or the position of the author of the original text is not formulated.
K4 Attitude to the position of the author on the problem of the source text
- 1 point The examinee expressed his attitude to the position of the author of the text on the problem (agreeing or disagreeing with the author) and substantiated it.
- 0 points. The examinee did not express his attitude to the position of the author of the text, or the examinee's thoughts do not correspond to the formulated problem, or the examinee's opinion is stated only formally (for example, "I agree / disagree with the author")
II. Speech design of the essay
K5 Semantic integrity, speech coherence and sequence of presentation
- 2 points. The examinee's work is characterized by semantic integrity, speech coherence and sequence of presentation: - there are no logical errors, the sequence of presentation is not broken; - there are no violations of paragraph articulation of the text in the work.
- 1 point The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, but 1 logical error was made, and/or there is 1 violation of paragraph articulation of the text in the work.
- 0 points. In the work of the examinee, a communicative intent is visible, but more than 1 logical error was made, and/or There are 2 cases of violation of paragraph articulation of the text.
K6 Accuracy and expressiveness of speech
- 2 points. The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, the variety of the grammatical structure of speech. * The highest score for this criterion is received by the examinee only if the highest score is obtained according to criterion K10.
- 1 point The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, but the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech is traced, or the work of the examinee is characterized by a variety of grammatical structure of speech, but there are violations of the accuracy of the expression of thought.
- 0 points. The work of the examinee is distinguished by the poverty of the dictionary and the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech.
III. Literacy
K7 Compliance with spelling rules
- 3 points. There are no spelling errors (or 1 minor error).
- 2 points. Made 1-2 mistakes.
- 1 point 3-4 mistakes were made.
- 0 points. More than 4 mistakes were made.
K8 Compliance with punctuation rules
- 3 points. There are no punctuation errors (or 1 minor error).
- 2 points. 1–3 mistakes made
- 1 point 4-5 mistakes were made.
- 0 points. 6 or more errors were made.
K9 Language Compliance
- 2 points. There are no grammatical errors.
- 1 point 1-2 mistakes were made.
- 0 points. 3 or more errors were made.
K10 Compliance with speech norms
- 2 points. No more than 1 speech error allowed.
- 1 point Made 2-3 mistakes.
- 0 points. 4 or more errors were made.
K11 Ethical Compliance
- 1 point There are no ethical errors in the work.
- 0 points. Ethical errors made (1 or more).
K12 Maintain factual accuracy in background material
- 1 point There are no actual errors in the background material.
- 0 points. There are factual errors (1 or more) in the background material.
Maximum amount points for the entire written work (K1–K12) - 24 points.
- When assessing literacy (K7-K10), the volume of the essay should be taken into account.When counting words, both independent and auxiliary parts of speech are taken into account. Any sequence of words written without a space is counted (for example, "after all" - one word, "yet" - two words). Initials with a surname are considered one word (for example, "M.Yu. Lermontov" - one word). Any other characters, in particular numbers, are not taken into account when calculating (for example, "5 years" - one word, "five years" - two words.
- The assessment standards indicated in the table are designed for an essay of 150-300 words. If the essay contains a partially or completely rewritten text of the review of task 26 and / or information about the author of the text by the examinee, then the volume of such work is determined without taking into account the text of the review and / or information about the author of the text.
- If in an essay less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and 0 points are evaluated, the task is considered unfulfilled.
- When evaluating an essay with a volume of 70 to 150 words, the number of permissible errors of four types (K7–K10) decreases.
2 points for these criteria are given in the following cases:
- K7 - there are no spelling errors (or one minor mistake was made);
- K8 - there are no punctuation errors (or one minor mistake was made).
1 point for these criteria is given in the following cases:
- K7 - no more than two errors were made;
- K8 - one or three mistakes were made;
- K9 - no grammatical errors;
- K10 - no more than one speech error was made.
The highest score according to the K7–K12 criteria is not given for a work of 70 to 150 words.
- If the essay is a paraphrase or a completely rewritten source text without any comments, then such work for all aspects of the test (K1-K12) is estimated at 0 points.
- If the work, which is a rewritten or paraphrased source text, contains fragments of the text of the examinee, then only the number of words that belongs to the examinee is taken into account during the check. A work written without relying on the text read (not on this text) is not evaluated.
Solve in Russian
