Federal Judge Tatyana Otcheskaya stole other people's suitcases a year ago, but still wears the gown. "Case filed against unidentified persons"

Which day in the media continues to unfold a loud scandal on the topic impunity and permissiveness representatives of the national judiciary. We are talking about a Tyumen judge from the Federal Arbitration Court of the West Siberian District Tatyana Otcheskaya.

As the observers of the Kompromat-Ural Internet resource clarify, in all external paraphernalia, she is an “outstanding” servant of Themis. Doctor of Sciences, Professor, was a member of the High Qualification Board of Judges of Russia! But in reality, she turned out to be a kleptomaniac who cunningly waits for other people's suitcases at the Moscow airport and takes them along with her own, then one of them brings them back on a cart so as not to attract attention.

This shameful story, recorded in detail by Vnukovo service video cameras, occurred a year ago. But only recently injured by a thieving judge Zapir Akaev, the head of the "North Caucasian Institute for Advanced Training of Personnel in the Construction and Housing Complex" (NOU DPO "SKIPKK", a private institution, is not a university), who lost a computer and money from his suitcase, decided to make the plot public.

The reason is impunity inviolable Tatyana Otcheskaya. On the eve of the editorial office of Kompromat-Ural, it became known that the ICR and the prosecutor's office refuse to prosecute the judge. Lady Father, guided by at least elementary morality, did not resign voluntarily. Her boss, chairman of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of the West Siberian District Vladislav Ivanov, despite the widest public outcry, publicly ignores the egregious situation.

Correspondents of the Kompromat-Ural portal report that for the year before last, 2014, only the official income of Judge Paternal exceeded 4.7 million. rubles, i.e. almost 400 thousand monthly, its declaration for 2015 has not yet been published. In addition, in 2014 the heroine judge had two huge apartments, on 363 and 164 square meters, two garage, two foreign cars. Probably, Tatyana Ivanovna, of course, did not steal other people's suitcases and did not clean them from the treasured banknotes, but she did everything according to the law, and in the income statement for 2015 she will definitely indicate everything “accidentally seized”.

Who is to blame: the owner of the suitcase stolen by a federal judge spoke about the incident

The theft happened a year ago, but the case has not yet been closed. The owner of the luggage stolen in Vnukovo by a judge from Tyumen spoke about the incident. According to the rector of the North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Training of Personnel in the Construction and Housing Complex (NOU DPO "SKIPKK") Zapira Akayeva, the theft occurred at the end of March 2015, but he has not yet been allowed to familiarize himself with the case materials and did not name the suspect. It is only known that the suitcase, according to preliminary data, was taken by a federal judge.

According to Akaev, on that day he was supposed to fly from Makhachkala to Moscow on an airline flight UTair, but did not get on the plane due to a technical failure.

“This whole mess started at the Makhachkala airport. I checked in, checked in my luggage and waited for the boarding announcement. But it so happened that in Makhachkala they did not land, but replanting, other people were put in my place. When I asked why, I was told that the plane was taxiing. As a result, I demanded to stop the liner, give me my luggage, because, in accordance with the code, luggage should not take off without a passenger. They apologized to me, I gave evidence, there was another girl with me who handed over bags at registration. They telegraphed to Moscow at Vnukovo that there had been a technical failure, and I was leaving on the next flight in two hours to Domodedovo, and in the telegram they asked me to put my luggage in the baggage room. I saw this telegram myself,” Akayev said.

However, his suitcase was not in the unclaimed luggage room at Vnukovo.

“They [airport workers] sent me to the tracing service, where they told me to contact the company UTair that they will reimburse me in accordance with the air code. This angered me, because there was a telegram, these ladies had to determine my luggage in the room, ”explained the owner of the missing suitcase.

After that, the police showed Akaev a video from the camera, which recorded the moment of the theft.

“Then he [the policeman] showed me a video of my bag on the assembly line, I recognized it. My bag made one circle, and at some point a lady in red boots, a long coat came up, took it off the conveyor with both hands and drove it.

The problem is that at the exit Vnukovo no one checks the numbers of the boarding pass and luggage. To my question, they told me that they reduced this position - contact the minister transport. At the exit, no one inspects or checks,” the victim specified.

After that, he wrote a statement to the police about the theft, after about two or three weeks the suitcase was found in one of the Moscow hotels. However, there was no laptop in the bag and 200 thousand rubles lying under the cover.

“I went to the traffic police and wrote a statement about the theft. Time passed, they called me, asked me to fully describe the contents of the bag, which I have already done several times. I did it, then they called me, they said that my luggage was found in President Hotel already unpacked in the storage room and asked to describe it again for sure. It turned out that everything was there except for a laptop, and I had 200 thousand rubles under the cover. I was reproached for carrying money in my luggage, although this is my business, ”the rector of the institute specified.

Despite the fact that the theft of the suitcase was recorded by a surveillance camera, Akaev is still not familiar with the case file and does not know the name of the suspect. The reason is that a federal arbitration judge took the bag. According to her, a third party is involved in the case.

“They told me that my case was difficult, maybe even hopeless, because someone unattainable stole my luggage. I even asked if it was a thief in law or your employees? I was told that if the workers, we would quickly figure it out, thieves are not authority for us, but, oddly enough, your bag was stolen by a federal arbitration judge. I could not come to Moscow right away because of my work.<...> The fate of my luggage until March of this year was unknown. They said until the status of a federal judge is removed, the criminal case is futile. In March, they called me, I arrived in Moscow, they gave me my suitcase against signature, in which there is neither a laptop nor 200 thousand rubles.<...>I still do not know her name, I am not familiar with the materials of the case. On my insistence, I was told that this is a federal arbitration judge, and she testifies that there is a third person who asked him to remove this bag. This is nonsense,” the owner of the stolen items explained.

The man will not be able to receive compensation from the airline, as the luggage was found

“When I arrived in Moscow and saw this lawlessness, I got lost there all night.<…>Companies UTair I cannot make a claim, because at the beginning they told me: either they will find the luggage, or they will compensate in the amount of 600 rubles per kilogram. Since the luggage was found, the company is no longer responsible for this luggage, ”he explained.

Previously TV channel lifenews published the name of the suspect in the theft. She turned out to be a judge of the arbitration court of the West Siberian District Tatiana Otcheskaya. According to her, a friend asked her to pick up someone else's bag, whose name the judge did not remember.

According to Vnukovo police officers, after the abolition of the position of an airport employee who checks luggage tags at the exit from the terminal, the number of luggage thefts has increased dramatically. One of those who helped Akaev find his luggage is a former senior detective Vladimir Menyaev. The police officer helped to uncover a gang, which included about 50 porters-thieves at Vnukovo airport. However, after the police officer spoke about cases of luggage theft from passengers, his removed from office.

A judge who flew to Moscow to improve her skills was convicted of stealing someone else's suitcase at the airport

Judge of the Federal Arbitration Court of the West Siberian District (FAS ZSO) Tatiana Otcheskaya became a defendant in a criminal case initiated on the fact of the theft of luggage. The crime was committed at Vnukovo airport, where the exemplary and experienced servant of Themis flew in to undergo a training program in the capital. She tried to leave the airport with three suitcases, two of which were strangers.

About the investigation of this crime writes lifenews, without specifying the dates of the incident and the initiation of a criminal case. Tatyana Otcheskaya herself refused to explain the situation. And in the reception of the FAS ZSO they reported that they could not comment on the acts committed judges.

According to the channel lifenews, 58-year-old Tatyana Otcheskaya arrived in the capital from Tyumen to improve the skills of judges. She checked in one of her bags, but for some reason she took two more suitcases from the moving belt. A little later, the woman was afraid that she would not be able to carry so many pieces of luggage through the security point, and left one suitcase.

The suitcase taken by the judge from the airport belonged to the rector of the North Caucasian Institute for Advanced Training of Personnel in the Construction and Housing Complex (SKIPKK) Zapiru Akayeva who missed his flight from Makhachkala. “Therefore, the bag arrived at Vnukovo before him,” added a law enforcement source.

According to the investigators, Tatyana Otcheskaya “noted that the black wrapped bag was spinning on the tape for a long time and no one was coming up to her.” Then she decided to assign luggage. Moreover, Father's actions were recorded by a surveillance camera, and a video of the theft was published by lifenews.

According to the injured high-ranking teacher, the missing luggage contained 200,000 rubles, six bottles of expensive alcohol and a laptop. After arriving in Moscow, Akaev turned to the police, and soon the identity of the alleged culprit of the theft was established ...

A criminal case was initiated on the fact of the theft, the proceedings are still ongoing.

Judge Otcheskaya told why she took someone else's suitcase to Vnukovo

RBC correspondent Tyumen met with the judge of the Arbitration Court of the West Siberian District Tatyana Otcheskaya and listened to her version of the story about the suitcase with money stolen at Vnukovo airport. According to Tatyana Otcheskaya, a year ago (namely, then everything happened), she went to a meeting of the Supreme examination committee RF judges.

“I do this on a monthly basis as I am a member of the commission. The trip is short - from Wednesday to Friday. She flew to Vnukovo, without receiving luggage, went to the toilet room. There I met a woman with whom I once flew on an airplane, we talked about business trips. She offered to give me a ride to the hotel, but my own car was waiting for me. We said goodbye,” the judge said. - I stayed in the toilet room and then another woman came out of the stall. She addressed me by my first name and patronymic, introduced herself as an employee of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, said that we were acquainted with her (though I didn’t remember her), referred to the professors with whom I communicate closely. She said she often visited us in Tyumen for international conferences. All of this drew me to her. Further, she said that she was returning from a business trip from the Caucasus and she had a heavy suitcase with crystal. She asked me to take him to the hotel, said that later she would come for him. She was in a hurry somewhere and tearfully asked for help.

According to Otcheskaya, she agreed and went to the luggage counter - took her suitcase and saw the woman's luggage - a large bag with the inscription "Crystal".

“I took this bag too. I got into my company car and drove to the hotel. The concierge brought the bags to the room. But no one came for the suitcase, says Otcheskaya. - Then all sorts of thoughts began to creep into my head: I took an unknown luggage from Dagestan. What if there are drugs or a bomb? I slightly opened the lid of the suitcase, looked that there were three bottles of cognac, a men's purse, clothes and a dagger. Everything. I gave the suitcase to the cell at the hotel, I was assured that the luggage would be guarded and given to the hostess as soon as she applied for it. I returned to Tyumen, continued to work, and then found out that I was suspected of stealing a suitcase.”

On July 29, the Moscow Investigation Department for Air and Water Transport of the Moscow Interregional Investigation Department for Transport of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation received a message about the theft at Vnukovo Airport of property belonging to the rector of the North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Training of Personnel in the Construction and Housing Complex Zapiru Akayeva.

During the pre-investigation check, it was established that on March 25, at 13:30, Akayev arrived at the Makhachkala airport in order to fly on the Makhachkala-Moscow flight. However, he missed the indicated flight, and his luggage was sent on this flight. Akaev bought a ticket for the next flight to Moscow, flew in, but did not find his luggage and turned to the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia at the Vnukovo airport. When reviewing the CCTV footage, it was found that his luggage was taken by a woman who later turned out to be judge Tatiana Otcheskaya.

August 3, 2015 Investigator for the Department of Internal Affairs of the Moscow Investigation Department for Air and Water Transport of the Moscow Interregional Investigation Department for Transport of the RF IC refused to initiate criminal proceedings.

“In the course of the check, no objective data indicating Tatyana Otcheskaya's involvement in the theft of Akayev's property was received, which is confirmed by the materials of the pre-investigation check. To refuse to initiate a criminal case, due to the absence of corpus delicti in the actions of the Father, ”the decision was written.

Meanwhile, Zapir Akaev told RBC Tyumen that currently criminal case is not closed and it is conducted by the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation.

“What the judge says, let it remain on her conscience. A criminal case has been initiated, and it is not closed. I was not allowed to get acquainted with the materials, but in an oral conversation with the investigator it turned out that paternal points to a third person who allegedly asked her to get someone else's bag. Last month I was told that the criminal case had not been closed, they were looking for this third person,” says Zapir Akaev. - I do not know the level of professionalism of your judge, but even a simple layman is told from all the loudspeakers: do not accept someone else's cargo for transportation, do not touch it ... And she, having the status of immunity, took someone else's bag, moreover, there was a luggage tag, a suitcase from Makhachkala arrived."

Zapir Akaev said that the theft of his luggage was discovered by a senior detective of the Linear Department of Internal Affairs at Vnukovo Airport Vladimir Menyaev. This man is known for uncovering a gang of loader thieves who took money and valuables out of suitcases. According to some information, employees of baggage screening and airport security, who pointed out to the loaders the "necessary" bags and informed what exactly they could take from them. It should be noted that Zapir Akayev's suitcase contained 200,000 rubles and a laptop, which miraculously disappeared. When the luggage was finally returned to the man in March of this year (it had been kept in the UK as material evidence for a year), there was no money or a computer in it.

And, apparently, the victim does not exclude that the money could have been stolen by the group that Vladimir Menyaev fought against. “He determined from the video that Mrs. Tatyana Otcheskaya took my suitcase, found out where she took it, found and seized my luggage. And in the end, a criminal case was opened against professional operatives and suspended them from work for the duration of the investigation,” Akaev said indignantly. - Here is such strange story. Whether the judge is guilty or not, I cannot determine, I am not a court.”

A criminal case was opened against Menyaev according to the statements of the thieves detained by him, who complained about the abuse of authority by police officers during the arrest. “Thus, they practically block the work to prevent thefts from the luggage of airport passengers,” he commented earlier. lifenews captain. - In our development were the former police chief of the LUVD Vnukovo Karapetyan, customs officers and aviation security services. I am sure that all these persecutions against us are connected with the fact that we covered up a profitable business for them.”

Recall that this week it became known that a year ago a judge from Tyumen stole a suitcase with money at Vnukovo. In addition to 200 thousand rubles and a laptop, the rector's suitcase contained three gift bottles of cognac. Alcohol remained untouched.

58 year old Tatiana Otcheskaya became a judge of the Federal Arbitration Court of the West Siberian District in 2000. She calls the situation with the suitcase a mistake, a misunderstanding. Today Otcheskaya admitted to RBC Tyumen that she does not understand why this story of a year ago is on the agenda again. "I do not associate this case with professional activity, did not cross the road to anyone. I don't know what's going on,” she said.

More detailed and a variety of information about the events taking place in Russia, Ukraine and other countries of our beautiful planet, can be obtained on Internet conferences, constantly held on the website "Keys of Knowledge". All Conferences are open and completely free. We invite all waking up and interested ...

According to Tatyana Otcheskaya, a year ago (namely, then everything happened) she went to a meeting of the Higher Examination Commission of Judges of the Russian Federation.

“I do this on a monthly basis as I am a member of the commission. The trip is short - from Wednesday to Friday. She flew to Vnukovo, without receiving luggage, went to the toilet room. There I met a woman with whom I once flew on an airplane, we talked about business trips. She offered to give me a ride to the hotel, but my own car was waiting for me. We said goodbye, - said the judge. - I stayed in the toilet room and then another woman came out of the booth. She addressed me by my first name and patronymic, introduced herself as an employee of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, said that we knew her (though I didn’t remember her), and referred to the professors with whom I communicate closely. She said she often visited us in Tyumen at international conferences. All of this drew me to her. Further, she said that she was returning from a business trip from the Caucasus and she had a heavy suitcase with crystal. She asked me to take him to the hotel, said that later she would come for him. She was in a hurry somewhere and tearfully asked for help.

According to Otcheskaya, she agreed and went to the luggage counter - took her suitcase and saw the woman's luggage - a large bag with the inscription "Crystal". “I took this bag too. I got into my company car and drove to the hotel. The concierge brought the bags to the room. But no one came for the suitcase, says Otcheskaya. - Then all sorts of thoughts began to creep into my head: I took an unknown luggage from Dagestan. What if there are drugs or a bomb? I slightly opened the lid of the suitcase, looked that there were three bottles of cognac, a men's purse, clothes and a dagger. All. I gave the suitcase to the cell at the hotel, I was assured that the luggage would be guarded and given to the hostess as soon as she applied for it. I returned to Tyumen, continued to work, and then found out that I was suspected of stealing a suitcase.”

During the pre-investigation check, it was established that on March 25, at 13:30, Akayev arrived at the Makhachkala airport in order to fly on the Makhachkala-Moscow flight. However, he missed the indicated flight, and his luggage was sent on this flight. Akaev bought a ticket for the next flight to Moscow, flew in, but did not find his luggage and turned to the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia at the Vnukovo airport. When viewing the CCTV footage, it was found that his luggage was taken by a woman who later turned out to be judge Tatiana Otcheskaya.

On August 3, 2015, the investigator for the Department of Internal Affairs of the Moscow Investigation Department for Air and Water Transport of the Moscow Interregional Investigation Department for Transport of the RF IC refused to initiate a criminal case.

Meanwhile, Zapir Akaev told RBC Tyumen that at present the criminal case is not closed and it is being conducted by the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation.

“What the judge says, let it remain on her conscience. A criminal case has been initiated, and it is not closed. I was not allowed to get acquainted with the materials, but in an oral conversation with the investigator it turned out that Otcheskaya points to a third person who allegedly asked her to get someone else's bag. Last month I was told that the criminal case had not been closed, they were looking for this third person, - says Zapir Akaev. - I do not know the level of professionalism of your judge, but even a simple layman is told from all the loudspeakers: do not accept someone else's cargo for transportation, do not touch it ... And she, having the status of immunity, took someone else's bag, and there was a luggage tag, a suitcase from Makhachkala flew ".

Zapir Akaev said that the theft of his luggage was revealed by the senior detective of the Linear Department of Internal Affairs at the Vnukovo airport, Vladimir Menyaev. This man is known for uncovering a gang of loader thieves who took money and valuables out of suitcases. According to some reports, baggage screeners and airport security officers participated in the scheme, pointing out to the loaders the “necessary” bags and telling them what to take from them. It should be noted that Zapir Akayev's suitcase contained 200,000 rubles and a laptop, which miraculously disappeared. When the luggage was finally returned to the man in March of this year (it had been kept in the UK for a year as material evidence), there was no money or a computer in it.

And, apparently, the victim does not exclude that the money could have been stolen by the group that Vladimir Menyaev fought against. “He determined from the video that Mrs. Tatyana Otcheskaya took my suitcase, found out where she took it, found and seized my luggage. And as a result, a criminal case was opened against professional operatives and they were suspended from work for the duration of the investigation, - Akaev is indignant. - This is such a strange story. Whether the judge is guilty or not, I cannot determine, I am not a court.”

A criminal case was initiated against Menyaev based on the statements of the thieves detained by him, who complained about the abuse of authority by police officers during the arrest. “Thus, they practically block the work to prevent thefts from the luggage of airport passengers,” the captain commented earlier to LifeNews. - In our development were the former police chief of the LUVD Vnukovo Karapetyan, employees of the customs service and the aviation security service. I am sure that all these persecutions against us are connected with the fact that we covered up a profitable business for them.”

58-year-old Tatyana Otcheskaya became a judge of the Federal Arbitration Court of the West Siberian District in 2000. She calls the situation with the suitcase a mistake, a misunderstanding. Today Otcheskaya admitted to RBC Tyumen that she does not understand why this story of a year ago is on the agenda again. “I do not associate this case with professional activities, I have not crossed the road to anyone. I don't know what's going on," she said.

Karamzin Kantemir Feliksovich Artur Kokoev

compromising- natural@ protonmail. com

At this place there was an article under the heading "Gold dissuaded Summa, or Why the forecast of the Kompromat-Ural editorial board regarding Ziya (v) udin Magomedov comes true." The text of the article dated 04/04/2018 consisted of five paragraphs. Only one of them mentioned Mikhail Kiyko. Mikhail Yuryevich is now the former general director of JSC United Grain Company (OZK). Kiyko stayed in this position for barely a year and a half, and was fired in November 2018. OZK JSC is half owned by a businessman Ziyavudin Magomedov.

The mention in the above-mentioned article of the "relationship of financial dependence" between Magomedov and Kiyko caused displeasure of the latter. The application of Mr. Kiyko with a demand to remove the contested article (all five paragraphs, and not just about Kiyko) was considered by the judge of the arbitration court Sverdlovsk region Elena Seliverstova. She fully satisfied the far-fetched, in our opinion, claim.

On January 9, 2019, the decision came into force. Following the letter of the law, the editors of Kompromat-Ural removed the text within the prescribed period. However, we will continue to challenge the illegal and absurd, in our opinion, judicial act and thank you to all readers who contribute to this.

We remind you of the feedback address:compromising- natural@ protonmail. com

The May holidays turned out to be hot for the correspondents of the Kompromat-Ural portal. We have new information at our disposal to continue the anti-corruption investigation against the deputy of the State Duma of the Russian Federation Nikolay Brykin. it former general tax police and the Ministry of Internal Affairs, and now the representative of the lower house of parliament in the Supreme Court (Brykin was delegated to the State Duma in 2016 on the list of United Russia from Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug, Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug and the Tyumen Region).

The scandals around Brykin are caused by the fact that the Ugra businessman from the “list Titov» Konstantin Dyulgerov, forced to flee Russia from the pressure of the security forces, openly accused the retired general of organizing a custom-made criminal prosecution. Dyulgerov revealed the details of his misadventures in detail in an up-to-date interview with Novaya Gazeta. The victim in the dubious case of Dyulgerov is Brykin's son-in-law Sergey Kiryanov, and the hero of the scandal, as the editors of Kompromat-Ural found out, before being nominated to the State Duma, re-registered multimillion-dollar development assets on the Black Sea coast to his daughter Valentin Kiryanov(in 2016, Breeze LLC, rewritten to it, had property worth almost half a billion rubles on its balance sheet!). Brykin went to the deputies already as a modest representative of the "patriotic fund" (legally, this was a fiction).

The other day, the editorial office of Kompromat-Ural received a response from the Assistant Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation Valeria Volkova(Valery Georgievich came from the leadership of the Office of the Prosecutor General for Supervision of the Implementation of Anti-Corruption Legislation). We turned to Yuri Seagull on the issue of verifying the reliability of declaration information about the personal wealth of Mr. Brykin. Does the people's servant live within his means, who in the shortest possible time after his dismissal from the Ministry of Internal Affairs turned into a dollar millionaire, and then also quickly got rid of his "deserved" wealth before the elections to the State Duma?

In a recent publication by our colleagues from the Tyumen publication 72.ru, it was noted that, according to formal declarations, Nikolai Brykin dangles at the bottom of the deputy rating: “in 2017, his income amounted to“ only ”4.8 million rubles. Less than the rest, but do not rush to conclusions. He owns two huge land, a couple of spacious country houses and a modest apartment of 76 squares. His wife has a bigger apartment: 116 square meters. It also recorded four residential country houses and two land plots. And all their family vehicles are registered to Brykin's wife - Toyota Land Cruiser, Shore Land SRV31B trailer and Sea Ray 185S boat. How the lady managed to buy it all herself, earning 2.9 million a year, one can only guess.

Yury Chaika's assistant told the Kompromat-Ural editors that the Duma commission for monitoring the reliability of information about income, headed by Natalia Poklonskaya(She is also Deputy Chairman of the Committee on Security and Anti-Corruption). Therefore, according to the answer of Valery Volkov, the appeal about Brykin was sent to the lower house. The editors of Kompromat-Ural will follow the answers of the apparatus of the speaker of the State Duma Viacheslav Volodin and profile committee. In mid-April, Mrs. Poklonskaya confirmed to reporters that Brykin was indeed one of the five defendants in the anti-corruption checks conducted by the commission she leads. By the way, in this list, Brykin is next to the “pubic” deputy from the Liberal Democratic Party, the hero of immoral sex scandals Leonid Slutsky.

Current Publications

11,000 deceived shareholders of the bankrupt investment fund Yamal can join the depositors of the bank Yugra, whose claims are directed to the banker arrested the other day Alexey Khotyn. As follows from the published documents studied by the editors of Kompromat-Ural, more than a billion rubles from the assets of Yamal were directed to the purchase of obviously illiquid bills of the Krasny Bogatyr company, controlled by Khotin. Obviously, the banker could pull off such a large-scale scam only in collusion with the former leaders of Yamal and the fund's property management company.

In November last year, the inglorious history of the Yamal Fund OJSC, which was dubbed the “Yamal MMM” in the press, ended with the ruling of the arbitration court on the liquidation of the enterprise. Almost 11 thousand residents remained deceived by fund investors autonomous region, including representatives of the small peoples of the North, whose small incomes were skillfully used by swindlers.

In a letter to the Governor of YaNAO Dmitry Kobylkin dated 2010, minority shareholders told how in the early 90s the former CEO of the Fund Evgeniy Sklyarov actively traveled around the towns and villages of the district, not ignoring even the temporary camps of reindeer herders, met with people and persistently offered them to exchange the recently received privatization checks for the Fund's shares.

At first, the investors who responded to this offer felt confident: the Fund converted the collected vouchers into Gazprom shares, which until 2008 accounted for 90% of its investment portfolio. And then events began, which can only be explained by the selfish interests of people authorized to make decisions ...

Perm security officials hope sooner or later to detain the former chairman of the board of JSCB "Ekoprombank" Andrew Tueva(TIN 590301312244), who has been in Cyprus for several years, evading extradition to Russia in every possible way. According to investigators, Tuev's machinations to withdraw assets brought the bank to a financial collapse, sources from the editorial board of Kompromat-Ural say. Today this is perceived as satirical, but the accused New Cypriot himself was a member of the organization “Public Commission for Combating Corruption in the Perm Region” several years ago.

By August 1, 2012, the obligations of Ecoprombank to creditors exceeded the financial capabilities of the institution by 847 million rubles! And by the time the license was revoked on August 18, 2014, this amount had increased to 3.1 billion rubles. Ecoprombank was established in 1992 and ranked 252nd in the TOP-300 banks. It is believed that 53% of the bank's shares belonged to the structures of the ex-general director of Silvinit Petra Kondrasheva, the rest - to the deputy Vladimir Nelyubin(also in the dock, his criminal case is being considered in the Leninsky District Court of Perm) and his companions.

The former chairman of the board of JSCB Ecoprombank Andrey Tuev fled Russia shortly after the bank's bankruptcy - on December 8, 2015. According to Interpol, Tuev, his wife Tatiana Mazuka, their son has been registered in Germany since 2011. The German identification cards issued by him, which were valid until the end of 2016, gave the defendants the right to permanent residence in Germany and to free movement in 26 countries that are members of the Schengen Agreement, as well as in the Republic of Cyprus and more than ten other states that are not part of this agreement.

On June 2, 2016, Tuev's wife flew from Moscow's Sheremetyevo to the Munich airport and never returned to Russia. In the bankrupt Ecoprombank, she worked as a member of the board, head of the treasury, deputy chief accountant - and became suspected of complicity in the fraud imputed to Tuev.

Do you know about financial abuse? Write to the editorial office of Kompromat-Ural:compromising- natural@ protonmail. com

After sending numerous appeals to the Presidential Administration, the Prosecutor General's Office, the FSB, the Investigative Committee and the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Kompromat-Ural editors became aware of the arrest of the scandalous lawyer involved in numerous frauds with large property assets. Prisoner - 48-year-old Karamzin Kantemir Feliksovich(TIN 773373042820, before the change of passport was Artur Kokoev). In the registers of the Federal Tax Service, he is a director of Nobel Technologies LLC, a co-owner of Lie Detector CJSC and Kamchatsky Medved LLC (a legal entity of one employee) and a former co-founder of International Lottery Company LLC (liquidated by the tax authorities as inactive). Judging by the abundance of the same type of sugary-laudatory links issued by Internet search engines in the first positions, Karamzin tried to hide from the public the unpleasant, with a criminal smell, facts of his biography.

Readers and correspondents of the Kompromat-Ural publication are interested in Mr. Karamzin (Kokaev) in connection with information about his corrupt relations with government officials and involvement in raider attacks. Now Karamzin is in a pre-trial detention center on suspicion of a particularly large-scale fraud. He was detained upon his return to Moscow from the United States, where he ignored the requests of Russian law enforcement officers for a long time. According to Pravo.Ru, the arrest took place at the entrance to the Moscow Arbitration Court. At the same time, Karamzin “became ill”, but the ambulance doctors who arrived in time did not find any reason for his hospitalization. Artistic abilities did not help this time?

The circumstances of the arrest indirectly confirm the exaggerated version of the close acquaintances of the suspect with "werewolves in robes." According to media reports, the measure of restraint for Karamzin was specially chosen not in the capital, but in the Moscow region - in the city court of Balashikha, "because of his connections in the Moscow judicial system."

In the comments of readers of IA Rosbalt, it is reported (literally): “the corrupt judges with whom he turned around have long been reassigned and went on promotion ...”. Sources from the editorial board of Kompromat-Ural believe that the FSB operatives will be interested in the arrestee's revelations about his connections in the justice system and the actions of the "judicial mafia" (unless, of course, there is one in our impeccable rule of law available). In the future, the recorded testimony may be useful for the Investigative Committee of Russia and the High Qualifications Board of Judges. Our correspondents, in turn, are also ready to accept interesting information and make them available to the competent authorities. Write:compromising- natural@ protonmail. com

The editors of Kompromat-Ural keep under control information about the schemes and scandals around the Naftagaz company. Recent reports from corporate and law enforcement sources suggest that Tokay Kerimov, the beneficiary of Naftagaz, which includes Naftagaz-Drilling, plans to introduce enterprises into the so-called "controlled bankruptcy". “The scheme may be as follows,” says an employee of law enforcement agencies, “not without the knowledge of Tokay Kerimov and the General Director of Naftagaz-Drilling” Islam Nazaraliyev LLCs are registered for third parties, where machinery and equipment are purchased with the money of creditors. Then all this is leased to NG-Bureniy at prices with all signs that they are obviously higher than market prices. Thus, Kerimov has two killed birds with one stone. Firstly, money is flowing for cash, and, secondly, creditors are increasing in front of the same friendly companies.”

The editors of Kompromat-Ural are collecting new information from knowledgeable experts to evaluate the version presented. According to the economist Andrey Weber, “such a scheme is used, as a rule, when a deliberate bankruptcy is planned. In the situation with Naftagaz-Drilling, the owner Tokay Kerimov and the company's management are acting according to a well-known scenario - they are doing everything to ensure that debts to friendly firms are higher than to other creditors. Then friendly firms will file for bankruptcy of NG-Burenia, Kerimov will appoint his own person as bankruptcy trustee and bankrupt the company as he pleases, most likely, he will transfer all the property to newly created legal entities with front owners. Thus, Tokay Kerimov will be able to bring NG-Bureniye into controlled bankruptcy,” the expert sums up his opinion.

It is worth noting that today Naftagaz-Drilling owes more than 3 billion rubles to real creditors, and a debt to “dummy” ones is likely to be about the same amount.

The largest operator of the waste reform, Municipal Unitary Enterprise of Yekaterinburg "Spetsavtobaza", for which the mayor is responsible Alexander Vysokinsky, under the pressure of public protest and the actions of inspection bodies, was forced to admit the exorbitance of their financial appetites. The day before, correspondents of the Kompromat-Ural project learned that Spetsavtobaza had changed its mind about getting an increase in its tariffs through the courts. Recall that the consideration of the claim in the Sverdlovsk Regional Court ended in failure for the scandalous enterprise: Themis sided with the prosecutor's office.

The resonance from the tricks of the new leadership of the "Spetsatobaza", which appeared in the MUP after the "accession" of Vysokinsky in the mayor's office, has already reached Moscow. So far - to the federal government, but soon Vysokinsky may "fly in" from the Presidential Administration, with which, as any official knows, jokes are bad. Head of the Federal Antimonopoly Service Igor Artemiev took personal control over the money "Wishlist" of EMUP "Spetsavtobaza". The head of the Regional Energy Commission (REC) of the Sverdlovsk Region can get from Artemiev Andrew Grishanov. This governor's appointee Evgeniya Kuyvashev coordinated tariffs for the waste operator together with his subordinates.

The main Russian anti-monopoly officer officially confirmed the fact of an inspection in relation to the regional REC "in order to determine the reliability and economic feasibility of tariffs" of EMUP Spetsavtobaza. According to the editors of Kompromat-Ural, the inspection of the FAS Russia has already pointed out signs of violations of the law committed by the RECs. Now Andrei Grishanov's department has the right to submit objections to the central office of the FAS, but has not yet done so, Artemiev specified. In any case, he promises to hold a special meeting of the commission in Moscow on the problem of the inflated tariffs of the Yekaterinburg Spetsavtobaza. Our correspondents will follow developments.

Meanwhile, the forecast made by the analysts of the Kompromat-Ural portal in one of the previous publications is confirmed. We reported that this Klondike for law enforcement (not only the prosecutor's office, but, for example, the FSB and the TFR) and control and supervisory authorities (primarily the regional OFAS under the leadership Dmitry Shalabodova) may become the procurement activity of EMUP Spetsavtobaza. In other words, where are the billions collected from citizens and businesses under the enslaving "garbage reform" flowing from the municipal enterprise? Particularly interesting are the facts of ignoring the requirements of transparency and manipulation with procurement procedures ...

Observers of the publication "Kompromat-Ural" are working on the development of a public investigation into the activities of EMUP "Spetsavtobaza". We are grateful to the readers for interesting posts on hot topic:compromising- natural@ protonmail. com

Current Publications

Read also