Man is a complex being that needs to be studied. Scientists not only pay attention to study the human body, but also understand the importance of internal psychological world. A person may be in conflict with himself. The article considers the concept, its types, causes of appearance, methods of resolution and consequences.

What is intrapersonal conflict?

In the life of every person there are intrapersonal conflicts. What it is? This is a contradiction within oneself, which is based on equivalent and at the same time opposite needs, desires, interests.

It is very easy to get confused in your own desires. On the one hand, a person may want to take revenge, on the other hand, he understands that his actions will harm his peaceful existence. On the one hand, a person wants to be rich, on the other hand, he is afraid of being bad in the eyes of others.

When a person faces a choice where one should choose something that is equivalent in importance to another, but opposite to it, then he enters into an intrapersonal conflict.

Developments can go in one of two directions:

1. A person will rapidly begin to develop if he mobilizes his own potential and begins to solve his problem.
2. A person will find himself in a "dead end", where he will drive himself, because he will not be able to make a choice and will not begin to act.

It is quite normal for a person to have a struggle within himself. Everyone lives in a world where there is so much truth. From childhood, everyone is taught that there can be only one truth, and everything else is a lie. A person gets used to living one-sidedly. However, he is not a "blind kitten", he sees that there are many realities in which people live.

Morality and desires, beliefs and actions, public opinion and one's own needs often come into conflict. So, a person may want to be a pianist, and his parents, whom he loves very much, want him to be an accountant. In such a situation, often a person chooses the “parental” path, and not his own, which leads to an unhappy life.

The concept of intrapersonal conflict

The concept of intrapersonal conflict is a confrontation that occurs within a person between two motives that are equivalent and opposite in direction. All this is accompanied by various experiences (fear, depression, disorientation), in which a person may not notice or deny them, replacing his state with active activity.

Quite a lot of psychologists have studied this topic to understand the motives and mechanisms of development of intrapersonal conflict. It all started with Z. Freud, who defined this concept as a struggle between instinctive desires and sociocultural foundations, between the conscious and the subconscious.

Other concepts of intrapersonal conflict are:

• The clash between the real "I" and the ideal self-image.
• The struggle between equivalent values, among which the highest is self-realization.
• The crisis of transition to a new state, when the old struggles with the new and is rejected.

Psychologists believe that intrapersonal conflict is a completely normal state for a person who, by nature, is a contradictory being. Everyone has periods in his life when he inevitably faces what he already has, and what he can have if he loses what he has.

The result of the resolution is the transition of a person to a new level, where he uses the old experience and develops a new one. However, people often give up development in order to preserve what they already have. This is called degradation. This can also be a way out of the situation if a person sees something in the “new life” that can significantly worsen his integrity, safety, and independence.

Causes of intrapersonal conflict

There are many reasons for the development of intrapersonal conflict. Three main reasons are:

1. Causes that lurk in the contradictions of personality.
2. Causes associated with the status of the individual in society.
3. Causes related to the status of an individual in a particular social group.

These reasons are interrelated. Often, internal conflicts arise against the background of the emergence of external factors, as well as vice versa. The more reasonable, understanding and complex in structure a person is, the more he is prone to internal conflicts, since he will strive to combine the incompatible.

Here are the contradictions on the basis of which intrapersonal conflicts arise:

• Between social norms and needs.
• Confrontation of social roles (for example, taking a child to kindergarten and at the same time doing work).
• Mismatch of motives, interests, needs.
• Inconsistency between moral principles (for example, go to war and adhere to the principle "do not kill").

The most important factor that provokes an intrapersonal conflict is the equivalence for a person of those directions at the crossroads of which he is. If for an individual one of the options does not play an important role, then there will be no confrontation: he will quickly make a choice in favor of the option that is most significant for him. The conflict begins when both options are important, significant and practically equivalent.

Contradictions that arise within a person due to status in a group:

• Physical obstacles that are organized by other people and interfere with the satisfaction of their personal needs.
• Biological problems that do not allow a person to show their full potential.
• The inability to realize their need to achieve the desired sensations.
• Excessive responsibility and limited human rights that prevent him from doing his job.
• Between working conditions and job requirements.
• Between professionalism, culture, norms and personal needs, values.
• Between incompatible tasks.
• Between the desire for profit and moral values.
• Between a clearly defined task and the vagueness of its implementation.
• Between career ambition and personal ability within an organization.

Types of intrapersonal conflict

The classification of intrapersonal conflict was proposed by K. Levin, who identified the following types:

1. Equivalent - the need to perform two or more significant tasks. In this case, a compromise is effective when partial substitution occurs.
2. Vital - the need to make equally unattractive decisions.
3. Ambivalent - when the actions taken and the results achieved are equally attractive and repulsive.
4. Frustrating - when actions taken or decisions made help achieve the desired, but contradict moral values, social norms and rules.

Another classification of types of intrapersonal conflicts is based on the value-motivational sphere of a person:

• Motivational conflict occurs when two equally equivalent tendencies come into conflict that contradict each other.
• A moral contradiction (normative conflict) arises when personal needs and moral principles, internal aspirations and external duty oppose.
• A conflict of unfulfilled desires is when a person cannot achieve his goal due to external barriers.
• Role conflict occurs when it is necessary to perform several roles at once, as well as when external requirements are not consistent with the internal understanding of the performance of one role.
• Adaptation conflict appears when internal needs and external social demands come into conflict.
• The conflict of inadequate self-esteem is formed when the opinions of others do not coincide with the opinion of a person about himself.

Resolution of intrapersonal conflict

Psychologists not only considered the mechanism of development of intrapersonal conflict, but also looked for ways to resolve it. It is believed that a person is formed during the first 5 years of his life. During this period, he is faced with many negative external factors that develop complexes in him, or a feeling of inferiority.

In the future, a person is only looking for convenient ways to compensate for this feeling. Adler identified two such methods:

1. Development of social interest and feeling, which can manifest itself in the development of professional skills, alcoholism, drug addiction, etc.
2. Stimulation of one's own potential, achieving superiority over the environment. This is done in the following ways:

• Adequate compensation - matching superiority with social interests.
• Overcompensation is the hypertrophied development of a specific quality.
• Imaginary compensation - external circumstances compensate for the feeling of inferiority.

M. Deutsch singled out open and latent forms of resolving an intrapersonal conflict:

• Open:

1. Decision-making.
2. Fixation on problem solving.
3. End of doubt.

• Latent:

1. Simulation, hysteria, torment.
2. Escape from reality into dreams, fantasies.
3. Compensation is the replacement of what is not achieved by other goals.
4. Regression - renunciation of desires, avoidance of responsibility, transition to primitive forms of existence.
5. Sublimation.
6. Nomadism - change of permanent residence, work.
7. Neurasthenia.
8. Projection - not noticing one's negative qualities, attributing them to other people.
9. Rationalization - self-justification, finding selective logical conclusions.
10. Idealization.
11. Euphoria is contrived fun.
12. Differentiation is the separation of thinking from the author.

Understanding these mechanisms is necessary for a successful exit from the intrapersonal conflict that occurs in absolutely all people.

Consequences of intrapersonal conflict

Depending on the ways in which a person gets out of his intrapersonal conflict, this period may be marked by self-improvement of the personality or its degradation. Consequences are conventionally divided into positive and negative.

Positive consequences arise when a person solves his intrapersonal question. He does not run away from the problem, he knows himself, he understands the causes of the conflict. Sometimes it turns out to satisfy two sides at the same time, sometimes a person compromises or must completely abandon one in order to realize the other. If a person resolves his conflict, then he becomes more perfect, achieves positive results.

Negative (destructive) consequences are the results when a person begins to be psychologically suppressed. There is a splitting of the personality, neurotic qualities arise, crises occur.

The more a person is affected by internal conflicts, the more he is subject not only to the consequences in the form of the destruction of relationships, dismissal from work, deterioration of activity, but also to qualitative changes in his personality:

• Irritability.
• Anxiety.
• Anxiety.

Often such conflicts become the causes of the appearance of psychological diseases. All this suggests that a person does not solve the problem, but suffers from it, avoids it, tries to run away or not notice, but it worries and worries him.

A person is not able to escape from himself, so the need to resolve an intrapersonal conflict is the main one. Depending on the decision made by a person, he will receive one or another result.

Outcome

A person is a complex of beliefs, rules, frameworks, desires, interests, needs and other attitudes, some of which are instinctive, some are personally developed, and the rest are social. Usually a person tries to satisfy all the needs at the same time, which are embedded in him. However, the result of such a desire is an intrapersonal conflict.

A person struggles with his own desires, interests or needs, because he tries to be everywhere and everywhere, to live for the sake of all desires, not to upset anyone, including himself. However, this becomes impossible within the real world. It is the realization of one's own inability to satisfy all one's needs that provokes negative feelings.

A person must cope with his own experiences in order to begin to deal with the problem that has arisen, and not further cultivate a sense of inferiority in himself .. You should start by studying the two opposing forces that cause internal conflict, and then decide how to eliminate it.

Your mind and heart feel like they are split.

You want to do something, but another part of you is screaming "there is no way!"

You believe in something, but you cannot justify the actions that faith teaches.

You feel it is right, but at the same time you also feel it is wrong.

How can you understand all this confusion, all this inner conflict? You feel your brain melt and you begin to despair.

If you feel like you are taking small steps towards madness, or the confusion is becoming too much to handle, stop right now. Pause. Close your eyes and take a deep breath. For the next minute, focus on your breath: inhale and exhale.

In this article, I hope to help you understand the roots of your internal conflicts and how to find peace of mind.

Internal conflict is the presence of opposing psychological beliefs, desires, impulses or feelings. In the field of psychology, internal conflict is often referred to as " cognitive dissonance”, which means the presence of conflicting and incompatible thoughts, beliefs and views. This psychological struggle can occur at any point in life in any area of ​​life, relationships, commitments, work, religious beliefs, moral views and social ideologies.

An example of internal conflict: a man who believes in women's rights, but does not allow them to make decisions. In the religious world, internal conflict often arises when a person is confronted with a doctrine or teaching that he is uncomfortable preaching.

The worst battle is the battle between what we know and what we feel.

When we encounter any internal conflict, it is because of a disagreement between our heart and head.

As research conducted at the HeartMath Institute shows, our hearts carry their own special kind of intuitive intelligence. When we are brought up in a society dominated by the mind, we become very confused and confused when our hearts are involved in daily activities. It is very easy to listen to the mind, mindlessly obey what others teach us, and plan our lives logically. But our hearts carry their own special kind of intelligence that is non-linear, sophisticated, and often very abstract. There is no formula, no set of rules that are tied to the intelligence of the heart: we must tune in to the voice within that often confuses us so much.

Our intelligence is what gives structure, direction and direction to our lives. practical use. But the intelligence of the heart is what breathes life and truth into the framework of our journey. Without listening to our hearts, we live soulless, dissatisfied and unreliable lives. But, not listening to the head, we live in absolute chaos.

As we can see, a balance is needed. We need to listen to both the heart and the head, but we often tend to put one above the other, which is the reason why we experience internal conflict.

So why is there internal conflict? This is because we do not have balance and balance between the heart and head. Our heart says one thing, but our mind says another: and both scream with the same intensity. When our actions are not aligned with our values, the inevitable result is feelings of discomfort and even shame. So what should we listen to, when, and why? We will look at the answer to this question, but first of all, we need to understand what creates internal conflict.

We face internal conflict for a number of reasons. Often there is no single cause or origin, but there are a number of factors that include:

• Beliefs and rules that we inherited from our parents.
• Religious beliefs, dogmas or creeds in which we believe.
• Social values ​​and ideals that we have adopted.

Simply put, the more beliefs, ideals, expectations, and desires we have, the more likely we are to suffer from internal conflict.

There are many various types internal conflicts, and I tried to cover as much as possible. Pay particular attention to the ones below.

1. Moral conflict

Ethical conflict occurs when we hold conflicting beliefs about what is related to our personal ethics. For example, moral conflict can arise when a person believes in human rights but does not allow euthanasia. Or a person may place a high value on truthfulness, but lie to save another person's life.

2. Sexual conflict

Sexual conflict often overlaps with other types of internal conflicts such as religious or moral conflicts. For example, a person may be a Christian, but he discovers that he is a homosexual. Or a person may appreciate a monogamous relationship when they are sexually more suited to a polygamous relationship.

3. Religious conflict

Religious conflict is quite common as it revolves around mind oriented beliefs and beliefs, which makes them especially fragile. Faith in a loving God is an example of religious conflict, but it's hard to accept that this "loving" being sends people to hell for eternity. Or a person who is religiously faithful uses various narcotic substances. When scientific facts religious conflict can arise in a person who values ​​both the truth and their religious beliefs.

4. Political conflict

Political conflict occurs when a person feels a split between his beliefs and those of his political party. For example, a person may believe in his country, but not in the tax system. A person may agree with a party but disagree with their healthcare system. Or a person may believe in political philosophy but disagree with the methods of supporting that party.

5. Love conflict

A love conflict occurs when we love someone and at the same time want to do something that will hurt them. For example, we may love our child, but believing that we have to beat him to make him obedient makes us feel guilty. We can also love a person and want to keep the relationship with him, but understand that we must let him go.

6. Conflict of self-esteem

Your image is your internal idea of ​​yourself, for example, “My name is Ivan. I am a patient, loving and compassionate person. I'm a disorganized artist who supports animal rights, etc." Internal conflict occurs when we are confronted with evidence that contradicts our beliefs about ourselves. For example, a person who thinks they are honest may lie on their resume to get their dream job. Someone who is for a healthy diet cannot stop smoking. A person who identifies as an empath may experience constant resentment towards the other person.

7. Interpersonal conflict

Interpersonal conflict intersects with other types of intrapersonal conflicts such as self-esteem and love. This type of conflict occurs in social situations where you want to do one thing but act differently. For example, Anton hates talking about sports, but he pretends to be interested in what his colleagues are saying. An introvert does not have much energy, but creates a façade of "heightened energy" to fit in with others. Or someone is offended by a friend, but does not say anything, even if you really want to say it.

8. Existential conflict

Existential conflict involves feelings of discomfort and confusion in life, especially when two opposing beliefs or desires arise. For example, to hate life, but at the same time love it. Or the will to live full life, but not wanting to make any changes or get out of their comfort zone. Existential conflict can also be directed at the world, such as the desire to save the planet, but at the same time believe that it is doomed or pollute it.

Note that all of these examples of intrapersonal conflict often overlap with each other. This list is also not definitive, so feel free to leave a comment if you think any kind of internal conflict is missing.

All the struggle takes place within. And what is the cause of the internal conflict? Attachment to beliefs, desires and expectations.

Quite simply, all our suffering comes from believing our thoughts instead of seeing them for what they really are: the transmission of energy fluctuations in the brain. Are we in control of our thoughts? No. Otherwise, we would always choose to think happy and harmonious thoughts. We don't even know what our next thought will be, let alone the next ten, because they all spontaneously arise and disappear. If we have no control over these thoughts, then how can they mean anything about us unless we ourselves give them meaning?

Sit down and try to watch your thoughts come. Are you in control of them? Or do they control you?

Also, here are some other tips that I hope can help you find more peace and clarity:

The difference between intuition and fear.

In the long run, which choice would be the wisest?

When our heart is dominant, we tend to make rash, poorly thought out decisions. When the head leads: prudence, foresight. Foresight is wisdom. With the knowledge you have now, what would be the wisest decision in the long run?

Weigh all the pros and cons.

If you're trying to find clarity, split the page in two. List all the pros of your solution on the one hand and the cons on the other.

Figure out your number one priority.

Internal conflict often occurs when we don't have a clear priority. What is your top priority right now? What do you value the most?

What misguided beliefs are fueling your confusion?

What false, misleading, limiting, or irrelevant beliefs are causing conflict within you? Write down your problem on a piece of paper and next to it ask "Why?" For example, you may want to keep your job, but also yearn to stay at home with your little ones. As you relentlessly ask why, you might find that you believe that being at home with children makes you a failure, and you have accepted this belief from society.

Be ruthlessly honest: what are you afraid of?

Fear is always at the root of inner conflict. What really scares you? What are you most afraid of? Sometimes discovering your underlying fear helps you gain more clarity and focus.

What is the "lesser of two evils"?

If you had to make a choice with a gun to your head, what decision would you make?

What resists the flow?

One easy way to test what "shouldn't be" is to study what causes more resistance in life. Remember, life flows easily. It is our thoughts and desires that cut the stream. So let's explore what creates a lot of resistance in life. Are you clinging to a ship that sailed long ago?

A more loving approach.

Do you respect your authenticity or honor what you "feel" you should do/be? Which approach or choice is more in line with truth and love?

Is there a more important issue?

Sometimes internal conflict actually hides deeper issues that need to be explored in order to find a solution, such as negative self-beliefs, unresolved feelings of shame, or childhood trauma.

Relaxation of the mind.

Relaxation is a great way to develop new perspectives. Try meditating, listening to soothing music, or practicing mindfulness. Often the best answers come when we're not looking for them.

Refuse to choose.

Do you need an answer right now? Sometimes letting life move in the direction it wants is a better option than a violent path. Wayne Dyer: "The conflict will not survive without your complicity."

I hope these tips help you find more peace of mind. Remember that it is absolutely normal to experience intrapersonal conflict, and there is nothing strange about you. Also, when it comes to internal conflicts, people tend to romanticize the heart and believe that we should only listen to what the heart wants. But this is an unbalanced approach: you need to listen to both the heart and the brain to create inner harmony.

If you want to sign up for a consultation, then you can use the phone number or fill out the feedback form, for this go to the page with contact details and choose the method that is convenient for you. Thank you!

If a person has no desire to develop, he has no taste for life, and panic attacks have become constant companions - this is not yet an internal Psychologist who will quickly cope with such problems. It is worse if a person does not understand his thoughts. Here it is already worth sounding the alarm.

Definition

Internal conflict is the contradictions that arise in a person in the subconscious. The patient most often does not understand what it is and describes his situation as emotional problems that cannot be solved.

Depression is an indispensable companion of the internal conflict of the personality and depends only on the person whether he can overcome it or not.

A person suffering from internal conflict thinks negatively, he has no rational thinking.

It is important to know that a neglected form of conflict leads to neurotic and even mental illness. Therefore, it is so important to worry in time and start treatment. It will depend on how large the internal conflict is. This means that the specialist will first have to classify the problem and only then take on its solution.

Classification of conflicts

First of all, a person who understands that he has a problem must familiarize himself with the terms. Indeed, most often people come at an already advanced stage, and then the work of only a psychologist gives a small result.

To date, scientists distinguish only two types of internal conflicts:

1. Human feelings do not correspond to the rules of society.
2. Disagreement with society or the presence of irritating factors have a bad effect on the subtle mental organization of a person.

Also highlight the levels of contradictions. The latter appear in a person in the subconscious.

1. The balance of the patient's inner world.
2. Internal conflict.
3. Life crisis.

The first level is determined by the fact that a person resolves internal conflicts himself.

But an internal conflict is when a person cannot solve his problems. In this case, all areas of life fail, and the conflict only gets worse.

The crisis of life is determined by the impossibility of implementing the plans and programs drawn in the head. Until the contradiction is resolved, a person cannot even perform the necessary vital functions.

It must be understood that all contradictions of any level are subject to resolution. It all depends on how high they are and whether it is possible to eliminate them or refuse them.

For the balance of the inner world to be disturbed, it is not enough only personality traits. There must be suitable situations. They are external and internal. The external ones include the satisfaction of deep motives. An example would be a situation where satisfied needs give rise to other needs; or fighting with nature.

But internal situations are internal conflicts of the sides of the personality. That is, a person realizes that the situation is difficult to solve, which means that contradictions have significant power.

Different scientists interpret the causes of intrapersonal conflict in different ways. Most of them are inclined to the version that the reasons are:

1. The reasons lie in the human psyche.
2. Causes that stem from what place a person occupies in society.
3. Causes that are influenced by the position of a person occupied in his social group.

But the isolated causes are not isolated. Internal conflict is influenced not by one, but by many reasons. That is, their separation is very ephemeral.

By identifying the causes, you can determine the type of personality conflict.

Reasons for the inconsistency of the human psyche

The internal causes of contradiction in the human psyche are:

1. The clash of personal needs and social norms.
2. Divergence of social role and status.
3. Mismatches of norms and values ​​of society.
4. conflict of interest.

All causes of intrapersonal conflict are due to the fact that a person cannot satisfy his fundamental needs and life motives. And if they mean a lot to a person or a deep meaning is invested in them, then this only exacerbates the problem.

External causes that are associated with the position of a person in his social group include:

1. A physical obstacle that makes it impossible to meet your needs.
2. Physiological resources that do not allow you to satisfy the need.
3. In order to satisfy the needs, there is no object.
4. Social conditions that make the satisfaction of needs impossible.

In addition to the causes of intrapersonal conflict associated with social status, there are also causes that are related to social organization. The following points can be highlighted:

1. The discrepancy between the working conditions and the requirements that apply to the result.
2. The difference between rights and responsibilities.
3. Organizational values ​​do not match the personal values ​​of the employee.
4. social role does not correspond to the status in society.
5. There is no opportunity to create and self-actualize.
6. Tasks and requirements are put forward such that they exclude each other.

In modern realities, it is often the cause of conflict that moral norms come into dissonance with the desire to make a profit. But more often than not, this happens only when a person begins to save his first money and look for a place in life.

All because in market relations a person is forced to compete with other people, which means that sooner or later hostility to society will turn into hostility towards oneself. This is how the internal conflict begins. In our society, absolutely opposite things are required from a participant in market relations. He must be aggressive in order to win his place, but at the same time cultivate altruism and other virtues in himself. It is precisely such mutually exclusive demands that are fertile ground for internal conflict.

Benefits of internal conflict

If a person has found symptoms of a conflict in himself, then what should he do? It depends on the individual. If a person is strong in spirit, then an internal conflict will push him to a reassessment of values, a change in some beliefs.

Psychologists specializing in intrapersonal conflicts identify the following positive factors:

1. A person who is in conflict mobilizes his forces and finds a way out of the situation.
2. The patient soberly assesses the situation, looking at it from the side. Thus, he can rethink his problems and solve them.
3. A person's self-esteem rises after he solves his problem.
4. Rational thinking appears, which does not work with intrapersonal conflict.
5. A person cognizes himself, which means that through inner harmony he relates better to society.
6. While a person is looking for a solution to his problems, he may discover a potential that he did not suspect because of low self-esteem.

But in order to get it all, you should not be shy and seek help from a specialist. In this case, you do not need to self-medicate, because only a few can really solve the problem. An aggravating circumstance is that neurotic illnesses, which are present at an advanced stage of the conflict, only complicate the search for solutions.

The danger of conflict

As harmless as this term may sound, it should not be underestimated. Of course, much depends on the individual, but still Negative consequences they all manifest the same way, just someone in a more vivid form. So, internal conflict is what prevents a person from revealing his personality, establishing communication with other people. The individual cannot show his strengths and it starts to burn out.

Internal contradictions become a permanent cause for suffering. I don’t want to do anything, my hands drop, the feeling of inner emptiness grows, and self-confidence is melting before our eyes.

If left untreated, the problem can lead to a nervous breakdown. And this person will get off easy. Launched intrapersonal conflict leads to serious psychiatric diseases. Therefore, you should not start the problem and think that it will resolve itself. It will not resolve, which means you need to look for a good specialist.

Multiple personalities

There is such a phenomenon in psychiatry. What should be done in such a situation? Contact a professional. But treatment doesn't always work.

An example is a story that happened in America. American Billy Milligan was convicted, but when he appeared in the courtroom, he did not understand what was happening. The jurors listened to several people, and everything would be fine, but only the defendant spoke the whole process. His habits changed, his manner of speaking, and even an accent appeared. Billy could act cheeky, smoke in the courtroom, dilute his monologue with prison jargon. And after two minutes the voice became higher, coquettishness appeared in the behavior, and the accused began to express himself very gracefully.

After all sorts of research, scientists came to the conclusion that Billy had a diagnosis of "multiple personality disorder." There were twenty-four completely formed personalities in his mind. Periodically, he felt that an attractive woman, then politician, then a small child or a prisoner.

Still, this is an extreme state of internal conflict. As a rule, with timely access to a doctor, such complications can be avoided.

Forms of intrapersonal conflict

To determine how to get rid of internal conflict, you need to understand in what form it manifests itself. There are six forms:

1. Neurasthenia. A person becomes irritable, working capacity decreases, he does not sleep well. Frequent headaches appear, sleep is disturbed. Depression becomes a constant companion. In fact, neurasthenia is one of the types of neurosis. And there is such a neuropsychic disorder, because the internal conflict is resolved incorrectly or ineffectively. Neurasthenic symptoms usually occur when a person is exposed to factors that injure his psyche for a long time.
2. Euphoria. A person becomes excessively cheerful in public, expresses his positive emotions without caring about the appropriateness of the situation, laughs with tears in his eyes. This form of conflict is characterized by psychomotor arousal and activity - both mimic and motor.
3. Regression. One who has this form of conflict begins to behave very primitively and tries to avoid responsibility for his actions. This is a kind of psychological protection, that is, a person consciously returns to where he felt protected. If a person begins to regress, then this is a direct sign of a neurotic or infantile personality.
4. Projection. This form is characterized by the fact that the person begins to attribute shortcomings to another person, to criticize other people. The form was called classical projection or protection, which implies its connection with psychological protection.
5. Nomadism. Man gravitates towards frequent changes. This may be a constant change of partner, job or place of residence.
6. Rationalism. In this form of conflict, a person tends to justify his actions and actions. That is, a person tries to reformulate his true motives, feelings and thoughts so that his own behavior does not cause protest. This behavior can be explained by the fact that a person wants to respect himself and maintain dignity in his own eyes.

Ways to resolve the conflict

If a person does not understand the problem of internal conflict and does not want to turn to psychologists, then you can try to cope with the phenomenon on your own. But you still have to attract close people. So, there are several ways to resolve conflicts and disagreements. Let's consider each separately.

Compromise

To resolve the internal conflict, you can try compromise solutions. That is, before you solve the problem, you need to give yourself the appearance of a choice. For example, where to go: tennis or chess? And then you need to choose the third option, for example, athletics. Don't give yourself a chance to doubt.

You should not always try to choose, you can combine - this is a compromise. After all, to cook sandwiches with ham and cheese, you do not need to choose in the store what to buy: cheese or ham. To satisfy the need, you should take both this and that, and a little bit.

You can also refuse to solve the problem and become a fatalist. That is, a person accepts everything that fate gives, and does not interfere with the course of events.

There is an example when a person was cured of an internal conflict, just by closing his mind to thoughts that he considers unacceptable. This man's name is William Stanley Milligan, and he simply refused to implement what he considered unacceptable for himself.

To successfully cope with the problem, sometimes it is enough to adapt to certain circumstances. But this behavior should not become a habit. But it is very necessary to correct your own foundations and values.

dreams

Some experts advise embellishing problems, thereby starting to fantasize. This means that a person will live in his fantasies and all his "wants and musts" will not conflict with each other. But still, most psychologists do not take this method seriously. In their opinion, it is better not to hide behind fantasies, but to cheer yourself up in difficult situations. The phrase that there are no hopeless situations is perfect for this purpose.

Acceptance of one's own worth

Each person has strengths, and in order to find them, a person needs to understand himself. Most often, people do not pay due attention to their achievements. Therefore, they constantly complain that they do not have enough opportunities. But the point is not the lack of the latter, but the fact that a person does not want to see ways to solve the problem. We can say that internal conflict is a biased attitude of a person towards himself. And all you need to do is sit down and think about how a person compares favorably with the rest. If you find in yourself something that deserves respect and is a strength, then overcoming internal conflicts will cease to be a problem.

Conflicts arise mainly due to the fact that a person does not understand himself what he is valuable for, but tries to prove it to others. No one will mock and humiliate a strong person, because he respects himself, which means that others respect him.

purpose

Internal conflicts destroy a person, because in this struggle there are only losers. A person with pleasure shifts responsibility for himself to other people or adapts to society. But if a person has found his destiny, then inner harmony is restored. The personality becomes strong and, thanks to the internal attitude, does not allow something to be imposed on itself or to confuse itself.

Simply put, to be happy you need a favorite thing. It will be a source of good emotions, inspiration and vitality. It is a person who understands his destiny, strong in spirit, happy and able to solve any problems.

Care

The person consciously avoids solving the problem. It is not necessary to make a difficult choice, which means that the person experiences relief for a certain period. In fact, a person simply waits for the problem to disappear by itself, and if it does not disappear, then the conflict only gets worse.

Sublimation

The internal conflict is resolved by this method due to the fact that the person translates psychic energy into acceptable forms. This is one of the most effective methods, as it allows not only to find the cause, but also to influence it. The ability to sublimate must be developed by constant exercises, despite the fact that all people have it.

Reorientation

In this way, people must first understand the reason that provoked the conflict, and who or what provoked it. In order to apply reorientation, you need to master the ability to manage motivation. The method is not fast, but the result is guaranteed to be excellent. If you can’t figure out your own value system on your own, then you need to contact a specialist. Under the guidance of a psychologist, it will be much easier to get rid of the conflict.

crowding out

If a person tries to force out unacceptable thoughts and motives for himself, then this is also considered a way to get rid of the conflict. Usually infantile immature personalities resort to this method. It is easier for them to forget something or forbid themselves to think about it than to try to eliminate the cause. The position of the ostrich in the sand is not effective, if only because not noticing the problem does not mean eradicating it. The likelihood of a recurrence of the conflict is high, and it is not a fact that it will not be in a more serious form.

Correction

Every person has some ideas about himself. The essence of the method lies in the fact that the struggle is not with the cause of the conflict, but with the individual's own ideas about it. That is, it is easier not to look for ways to eradicate the cause, but simply to change the attitude towards the latter. The effect of the method is rather average, although there are people whom it really helped. In general, if a person understands that he has a problem and needs to be solved, then he himself must choose the ways to solve it. After all, the result depends to a greater extent on self-confidence.

Conclusion

1. Intrapersonal conflict is serious problem which should not be underestimated. Lack of proper attention and search for ways to resolve the conflict can lead to numerous diseases, including psychiatric ones.
2. There are quite a few reasons for the internal conflict, which means that you do not need to act on advice on the Internet or from friends. Everyone has different situations and reasons for this or that behavior. Just because it works for one person doesn't mean it will work for another. It is best to go to a psychologist, because only a specialist will help to understand the causes and eliminate them.
3. There are also many ways to resolve an intrapersonal conflict, but the same principle applies here as with the causes. Whatever the negative reviews about this or that method, only a person should choose how to solve their problems. If he feels that this is how he can get rid of the conflict, then you should not rely on the opinions of others.

In conclusion, it is worth noting: in order to solve the problem once and for all, you need to know how it is done. And only a specialist knows this. Therefore, do not neglect the help of professionals, because they exist for this - to help you understand yourself.

I welcome you, dear visitors of the psychological site site.
Today you will find out what intrapersonal conflict and how to deal with it dialectics of the soul- a technique of talking with oneself to get out of a psychological impasse.

An intrapersonal conflict is a confrontation between various, often opposite and conflicting interests, desires and inclinations of a person - a conflict within the personality itself.

Such an internal confrontation of the personality leads a person to a psychological dead end, which is sometimes not easy to get out of.

During an intrapersonal conflict, a person experiences deep emotional and psychological experiences; his self-esteem decreases, intelligence temporarily falls, stress increases; he becomes indecisive and passive (apathy, laziness manifests itself, depression may occur).

Often, in the process of an intrapersonal discussion, as if a dispute between separate parts of the personality (different "Selves"), based on non-coinciding principles: the principle of pleasure (I want), reality (I can) and necessity (I must), a person brings himself to neurotic states: hysteria, psychasthenia, neurasthenia ... (depending on the accentuation of character and temperament).

As a result, being at an impasse, with an intrapersonal conflict, a person cannot make the right choice in life, or in a specific stalemate.

Therefore, in order to come to intrapersonal harmony, resolve the conflict and get out of the psychological impasse, many people need an intermediary (arbitrator) to reconcile the opposing sides of the personality (“I”-states).
This arbiter can be a professional psychologist or another significant, authoritative person (father, mentor, coach, teacher ...).

- basic psychological problem for many teenagers and adults with an immature personality. This is exactly what criminal gangs, sectarians, false psycho-trainers, sorcerers and wizards of all stripes, ISIS recruiters use, for example, speaking as psychologists and important people for fragile souls, and drawing them into their utopian organizations.

The dialectic of the soul

Immortal works of L.N. Tolstoy or F.M. Dostoevsky, and others - writers-psychologists, connoisseurs human souls- are sometimes saturated with painful inner experiences and intrapersonal conflicts of the heroes of the novels.

It is in these classic world-renowned works that the dialectics of the soul Russian (Slavic) person.

Read and think How does the dialectic of the soul work? Pierre Bezukhov, the hero of Tolstoy's novel War and Peace, has an excerpt:

“It would be nice to go to Kuragin,” he thought. But at once he remembered his word of honor given to Prince Andrei not to visit Kuragin.
But immediately, as happens with people who are called spineless, he so passionately wanted to once again experience this dissolute life so familiar to him that he decided to go.
And immediately the thought occurred to him that this word meant nothing, because even before Prince Andrei, he also gave Prince Anatole the word to be with him; finally, he thought that all these words of honor were such conditional things, having no definite meaning, especially if one realized that perhaps tomorrow either he would die, or something so unusual would happen to him that there would be no more neither honest nor dishonest ... He went to Kuragin.

Analyzing the course of thoughts and actions of Pierre, we see a small intrapersonal conflict, resolved with the help of the dialectics of the soul, and which did not lead the hero to a psychological dead end.

In fact, he was talking about himself and to himself. More precisely, one part of his "I", let's call it "Child", living on the principle of pleasure (I want) opposed (slightly conflicted) with another part of the "I", let's call it "Parent", living on the principle of honor, morality and morality (Need ), and the internal arbiter - the third part of the "I", let's call it "Adult", living on the principle of reality (I Can) - was absent or was passive, due to immaturity (hence the "spinelessness").

In this intrapersonal conflict, the inner "Child" won. "Parent" was weaker and therefore retreated. But he will remind himself more than once, for example, when the hero blames and reproaches himself for a stupid act.

In the usual real life people have many intrapersonal conflicts - some of them, like external conflicts, are constructive, while others are destructive.

Destructive - I think it's understandable - it leads to a dead end, but constructive intrapersonal conflict, using the dialectics of the soul, we will now consider.

Self-therapy technique "Dialectics of the soul" - a conversation with yourself

If you carefully read the article, then you probably realized that almost every normal person, in certain situations, talks to himself.

For many, personal disharmony arises, which leads to an intrapersonal conflict, which, in turn, can lead to a dead end, with possible neurotic disorders. To prevent this from happening, you need to learn the dialectics of the soul, i.e. constructive dialogue with yourself. Using all three parts of the personality (the three "I" states - Parent (I need), Adult (I can) and Child (I want) - this is the concept of transactional analysis)

In mild cases, you can talk to yourself in your head, to yourself. In more complex ones, with a predominance of negative emotions and stress, you can write or draw a dialogue with yourself (management of thoughts and emotions).

If you have already reached a psychological impasse, then the “two” or “three” chairs technique will help you. The essence of which is that you (conditionally) seat parts of your personality (Parent, Adult and Child) on chairs and yourself, taking turns sitting on a certain chair, lead a discussion either on behalf of one “I”, then from another ...

If you already have neurotic reactions due to an intrapersonal conflict, then you will need