The capture of the Crimea by the Red Army. victory over white. The defeat of Wrangel in the Crimea: when, who led and the investigation Who liberated Crimea from Wrangel

The revolutionary events of 1917 and the subsequent Civil War are among the most complex and controversial events in Russian history. But it doesn't matter which side to take today - in that era you can find many "dark" pages, and unconditional achievements on both sides. Among the latter is the defeat of Baron P.N. Wrangel in the Crimea in the autumn of 1920. The unique military operation actually ended intrastate clashes.

Black Baron of the White Guard

In 1920, the white movement in Russia noticeably weakened. His international support almost ceased: in the West, they were convinced of the unwillingness of their soldiers to fight the Red Army and of the popularity of Bolshevik ideas, and decided that it would be easier to distance themselves from the Russian state.

The Red Army won one convincing victory after another: the failure in the war with Poland in the spring and summer months of 1920 did not fundamentally change anything. The volunteer detachment of General Denikin, who previously controlled the entire south of the country, retreated. At the beginning of 1920, its territory was actually limited to the Crimean peninsula. In April, Denikin resigned, his place as the leader of the White Guards was taken by General P.N. Wrangel (1878-1928).

It was a representative of an ancient noble family. Among the general's relatives were A.S. Pushkin and the famous polar explorer F.P. Wrangell. Pyotr Nikolaevich himself had an engineering education, he participated in the Russian-Japanese and World War I, received well-deserved awards, including the St. George Cross. His candidacy as Denikin's successor was unanimously approved by the political leaders of the white movement. Wrangel owes his nickname "black baron" to his favorite clothes - a dark Cossack Circassian coat.

In the spring and summer of 1920, Baron Wrangel made several attempts to withdraw troops from and expand his influence in southern Ukraine. But the fearless defense of the Kakhovka bridgehead by the Reds (then in the USSR they sang about Kakhovka as a “stage of a long journey”) frustrated these plans. He tried to conclude an alliance with S. Petliura, but this year he no longer represented a real force.

Who led the operation and participants: impenetrable Perekop

On the other hand, the command of the Red Army experienced significant difficulties, trying to resolve the issue of the final defeat of the White Guard direction. For this purpose, a whole Southern Front was formed, but it was limited in scope. The Wrangelites built the strongest defensive system on.

There literally was not an inch of land that would not be fired from cannons or machine guns. Although Wrangel's army had significant supply problems, he had enough ammunition to hold for a long time and with heavy losses for the attackers. The Bolsheviks could not storm the Crimea from the south - they did not have a fleet on the Black Sea.

The autumn of 1920 showed an almost hopeless situation: Wrangel could not leave the Crimea, and the Red Army, despite its numerical superiority (almost 100 thousand against 28 thousand combat-ready Whites), was unable to enter.

Baron General Wrangel was a good commander, experienced ideological fighters served under him. But even against him were difficult people, talented nuggets with vast combat experience. Who led the operation to defeat Wrangel? In general, the invincible Soviet Marshal M.V. Frunze. But in this case, such well-known figures as

  • K.E. Voroshilov,
  • S.M. Budyonny,
  • V.K. Blucher,
  • Bela Kun,
  • N.I. Makhno.

At the disposal of the Red Army commanders were air reconnaissance data that clearly demonstrated to them the defense of Perekop. Among the units assigned to the capture of the Crimea, there was a kind of "revolutionary special forces" - the Latvian division. One can guess that such commanders with such fighters were able to cope with any task.

Perekop operation: the defeat of Wrangel's army

Hero V.S. Vysotsky in the film “Two Comrades Were Serving”, a Wrangel officer, describing the plan of this operation, put it this way: “Okay, I'm crazy, but what if the Bolsheviks too?” The plan to seize the Crimea was indeed unthinkable from the point of view of classical military science, but convinced people carried it out without hesitation.

November 8 V.K. Blucher launched an attack on the Perekop fortifications. His actions completely captured the attention of the defenders. On the night of the same day, two red divisions - about 6 thousand people - wade across the bay. It is shallow, a person of average height can cross it without sinking headlong. There were guides among the locals. But the bottom in the Sivash is muddy, swampy - this significantly impeded movement.

All found watercraft - fishing boats, rafts, even gates - were used exclusively for the transport of ammunition. November, even in the Crimea, is not the best time for swimming. People walked up to their chests and throats in water along the marshy bottom of the Rotten Sea. If someone fell through, they drowned silently, without splashes and cries for help. The clothes on the fighters froze.

But they passed, and on the morning of November 9, 1920, the Wrangelites were faced with the need to fight on two fronts. Two days later, Blucher broke through the defenses of Perekop, and the maneuverable detachments of Father Makhno arrived in time for the breakthrough. The Red Army quickly occupied new territories, and Wrangel could only take care of the evacuation of the maximum number of his supporters.

To his credit, he did his best, but the few ships did not take them all. Crowded transports left under the French flag for Constantinople. Wrangel himself then went there. A significant part of the remaining Wrangelites were shot after the capture of the Crimea. Everything was completed by the end of the month.

Results and consequences

The defeat of Baron Wrangel in the fall of 1920, which took place on the territory of the Crimea, actually put an end to the massive Civil War, then only the Basmachi in Central Asia and the atamans in the Far East resisted. You can feel sorry for the victims of the Red Terror as much as you like, but the Wrangel counterintelligence did not stand on ceremony with the revolutionaries either - such was the time. the last major operation of that time was a significant milestone in the development of military art. And the transition to a peaceful life, albeit at a high price, can only be welcomed.

The White Guard Command attached great importance to the retention of the Crimean Peninsula, since it could be used in the future as a springboard for waging a struggle against the Soviet Republic. Therefore, despite the loss of Northern Tavria, Wrangel hoped to wear down the Soviet troops and prevent their breakthrough into the Crimea by a dull defense in pre-prepared positions. The total number of White Guard troops was about 41 thousand bayonets and sabers. The enemy was armed with over 200 guns, up to 20 armored vehicles, 3 tanks and 5 armored trains444. The Perekop Isthmus was defended by units of the 2nd Army Corps (13th and 34th Infantry Divisions), Drozdovskaya, Markovskaya Infantry Divisions, and part of the forces of the Cavalry Corps. On the Lithuanian Peninsula, the brigade of the Kuban division of General P.P. Fostikov occupied positions. The Chongar Isthmus was defended by units of the 3rd Don Corps and a group of General Kaltserov. In the Yushun (Ishun) area, Dzhankoy, the reserve regiments of the Markov, Kornilov and 6th infantry divisions, as well as the rest of the cavalry corps, were concentrated. In addition, the 15th Infantry Division was urgently formed in the rear, designed to reinforce the Perekop or Chongar direction. Part of the forces (up to 6 thousand people) fought against the Crimean rebel army. Thus, Wrangel concentrated almost all of his troops (up to 27 thousand bayonets and cavalry) on the Perekop and Chongar isthmuses, since he believed that an offensive through the Sivash445 to the Lithuanian Peninsula was impossible.

Powerful fortified positions for that time were created on the isthmuses. Their engineering equipment was carried out from the end of 1919. British and French military specialists participated in the development of the plan for strengthening the Perekop Isthmus. All fortification work was led by General Fock.

Two fortified strips were created in the Perekop direction - Perekopskaya and Yushunskaya (Ishunskaya). The basis of the first was the Turkish shaft, about 11 km long and up to 10 m high. In front of it was a ditch about 30 m wide and up to 10 m deep. The shaft and the surrounding area were equipped with full-profile trenches, machine-gun and artillery firing positions with strong shelters, related message paths. The approaches to the shaft were covered with wire barriers in 3-5 rows of stakes. On the Turkish Wall, the enemy installed over 70 guns and about 150 machine guns, which made it possible to keep the entire area ahead under fire. From the west, from the side of the Karkinitsky Gulf, the first strip was covered by the fire of enemy ships, and in the east, the Turkish Wall rested against the Sivash.

The Yushunskaya strip (20-25 km south of Perekopskaya) consisted of six lines of trenches with communication passages, concreted machine-gun nests and shelters. Each line was covered with barbed wire in 3-5 rows. The Yushun strip closed the exits from the isthmus to the flat part of the Crimean peninsula and made it possible to keep the front area under fire. Its flanks rested against numerous lakes and bays. On the Chongar Isthmus and the Arabat Spit, 5-6 lines of trenches were equipped, covered with wire fences in 3 rows of stakes. The weakest was the defense on the Lithuanian peninsula. There were only two lines of trenches here, covering the fords across the bay in the most likely directions for the crossing of Soviet troops.

For the first time in the years of the civil war, the enemy managed to create a significant tactical density in the Perekop and Chongar directions: an average of 125-130 bayonets and sabers, 15-20 machine guns and 5-10 guns per 1 km of the front. The White Guard propaganda, trying to raise the morale of soldiers and officers, inspired them that the defenses created on the isthmuses were impregnable. On October 30, Wrangel, in the presence of foreign representatives, inspected the fortifications and presumptuously declared: “Much has been done, much remains to be done, but the Crimea is already impregnable for the enemy”446. However, the events that followed showed the complete failure of his forecasts.

The troops of the Southern Front, after the completion of the operation in Northern Tavria, occupied the following position: the 6th Army was on the line of the northern coast of the Black Sea, from the mouth of the Dnieper to Stroganovka on the banks of the Sivash; to the left, from Gromovka to Genichesk, the 4th Army was located, on its right flank in the Gromovka, Novo-Pokrovka area, the Insurgent Army concentrated, transferred to the operational subordination of the commander of the 4th Army; in the rear of the 4th Army, in the area of ​​​​Novo-Mikhailovka, Otrada, Rozhdestvenka, stood the 1st Cavalry Army, and behind it the 2nd Cavalry Army; The 13th army, having transferred the 2nd rifle, 7th cavalry divisions and the 3rd cavalry corps to the command of the commander of the 4th army, located south of Melitopol, entering the front reserve. The Azov military flotilla was based in the Taganrog Bay. In total, the troops of the Southern Front by November 8, 1920 numbered 158.7 thousand bayonets and 39.7 thousand cavalry. They were armed with 3059 machine guns, 550 guns, 57 armored vehicles, 23 armored trains and 84 aircraft447. In general, Soviet troops outnumbered the enemy in bayonets and sabers by 4.9 times, in guns - by 2.1 times.

The plan of the Perekop-Chongar operation, developed by the command and headquarters of the front in an extremely short time (5 days), followed from the plan of the strategic offensive operation of the Southern Front and constituted its second part. At the same time, the plan developed on October 2-4 to break through the enemy defenses on the Crimean isthmuses was taken into account. By this time, according to Soviet intelligence, the Wrangelites had 214 guns (85 guns in the Perekop direction and 129 guns in the Chongar direction), 26 armored vehicles, 19 armored trains, 19 tanks and 24 aircraft. According to the calculations of the front headquarters, 400 guns, 21 armored trains, 16 armored vehicles, 15 tanks and 26 448 aircraft were required to break through the defenses on both isthmuses. As can be seen from the data presented, the front command managed to fulfill these requests, with the exception of tanks.

Initially, given that the Perekop and Chongar directions were most strongly fortified, the command planned to deliver the main blow by the forces of the 4th Army from the Salkovo region while simultaneously bypassing the enemy’s defenses with an operational group consisting of the 3rd Cavalry Corps and the 9th Infantry Division through the Arabat arrow. This made it possible to withdraw the troops of the front deep into the Crimean peninsula and use the support of the Azov military flotilla from the sea. Then, by bringing into battle the mobile group of the front (1st Cavalry Army), it was supposed to develop success in the Chongar direction. At the same time, a similar maneuver was taken into account, successfully carried out in 1738 by Russian troops led by Field Marshal P.P. However, in order to ensure this maneuver, it was necessary to defeat the enemy flotilla, supported by American, British and French warships, which could approach the Arabat Spit and conduct flanking fire on Soviet troops. The task of defeating the enemy flotilla was assigned to the Azov military flotilla. But the early freeze-up fettered her ships in the roadstead of Taganrog, and she was unable to fulfill the order of the front command.

Therefore, two days before the start of the operation, the main blow was transferred to the Perekop direction. The idea of ​​the Perekop-Chongar operation was to seize the first and second lines of defense with a simultaneous strike by the 6th Army from the front and a roundabout maneuver of its strike group through the Sivash and the Lithuanian Peninsula. An auxiliary strike by the forces of the 4th Army was planned in the Chongar direction. Then, by the joint efforts of both armies, it was planned to dismember the enemy troops, defeat them in parts, bring into battle the mobile groups of the front (1st and 2nd Cavalry armies) and the 4th army (3rd cavalry corps) relentlessly pursue the retreating enemy in directions to Evpatoria, Simferopol, Sevastopol and Feodosia, preventing its evacuation from the Crimea.The cavalry detachment of the Insurgent Army, numbering about 2 thousand people, was supposed to participate in the pursuit. communications of the Wrangelites and to assist the units of the Red Army advancing from the front.

The choice of a new direction of the main attack in the midst of preparations for the operation testifies to the high military talent of MV Frunze, the flexibility and courage of his leadership of the troops, and his ability to take risks. And the risk was great, since a sudden change in the wind could raise the water level in the bay and put the crossing troops in an extremely difficult situation.

To build up efforts and ensure the rapid development of a breakthrough, a deep echeloned formation of front troops was envisaged. It included the first echelon (6th and 4th armies), mobile groups (1st and 2nd Cavalry armies), the reserve - the 13th army and the Combined cadet rifle division. The operational formation of the 6th Army was two-echelon with the allocation of the Latvian Rifle Division to the reserve, the 4th Army was three-echelon with the allocation of a mobile group (3rd Cavalry Corps) and a reserve (International Cavalry Brigade). The combat order of rifle divisions was built in 2-3 echelons. Such a deep construction was due to the relatively small width of the isthmuses, the need to break through the heavily fortified and deeply echeloned enemy defenses. In addition, it ensured the timely buildup of strike force, as well as the successful pursuit of the retreating enemy.

Shock groups were created in the armies of the first echelon of the front. In the 6th Army, the strike group included two (15th and 52nd) rifle divisions and the 153rd rifle brigade of the 51st rifle division, as well as its separate cavalry brigade - almost 50 percent of the army. Two brigades of the 51st Rifle Division (first echelon) and the Latvian Rifle Division (second echelon) were intended for a frontal attack on heavily fortified Perekop positions located on flat, devoid of any folds terrain. The strike group of the 4th army included the 30th rifle division, behind which the 23rd (second echelon) and 46th (third echelon) rifle divisions were to advance.

Much attention was paid to the formation of breakthrough groups (later they were called assault groups) and the training of fighters to attack in battle formation in waves. The first wave was a breakthrough group, which included scouts, sappers, demolition workers, wire cutters, grenade launchers and 2-3 machine gun crews. In the second wave, two battalions from each regiment of the first echelon were allocated, in the third - the third battalions of the regiments of the first echelon, in the fourth - regiments of the second echelon, in the fifth and sixth - reserves or regiments of the third echelon.

Artillery support for the breakthrough was built taking into account the nature of the terrain and the availability of artillery. The artillery of the strike group of the 6th Army (36 guns) was assigned divisionally to the brigades of the first echelon. The most powerful artillery group (55 guns) was concentrated in the Perekop direction, subordinate to the chief of artillery of the 51st Infantry Division and divided into three subgroups: two - to provide first-echelon brigades and one (anti-battery) - to suppress artillery and enemy reserves. A group of 25 guns was created in the Chongar direction. Artillery was responsible for artillery preparation of the attack and escort (support) of the advancing troops. The duration of artillery preparation before the assault on the Perekop positions was planned at 4 hours. Due to the skillful massing of forces and means in the Perekop direction, it was possible to create a tactical density per 1 km of the front: 1.5-4 thousand bayonets, 60-80 machine guns, 10-12 guns1.

The engineering troops of the front and armies conducted reconnaissance of approaches to the enemy's defenses and fords across the Sivash, fixed routes, prepared crossing facilities (boats, rafts), restored bridges, equipped supply and evacuation routes. The local population provided great assistance to the engineering units in reconnaissance and equipment of the fords. All work was carried out mainly at night, in severe frost, under artillery and machine-gun fire from the enemy.

Aviation conducted aerial reconnaissance, photographed enemy fortifications, bombed the rear and enemy reserves. The aviation units of the 6th and 1st Cavalry armies were, as before, concentrated in the hands of one chief and aimed at ensuring a breakthrough of the Perekop fortifications. With the beginning of the attack in the Chongar direction, all aviation of the front was subordinate to the commander of the 4th Army.

Much attention was paid to training personnel in techniques and ways to overcome artificial obstacles. To this end, units of the first echelon underwent training in the rear on specially created training camps that imitate enemy defenses on the isthmuses.

The task of party political work was to mobilize fighters and commanders to successfully overcome enemy fortifications and conduct an offensive at a high pace. The troops widely celebrated the 3rd anniversary of the Great October Socialist Revolution. Rallies and meetings were held under the slogans: “Give Perekop by the third anniversary of October!”, “Give Crimea!”. In accordance with the instructions of S. S. Kamenev of November 5, all communists from the rear and reserve units were sent to the formations that were to force the Sivash. To carry out the most complex and important tasks, three separate communist battalions were formed under the general command of the chief of the communist detachments2.

The operation was being prepared under exceptionally difficult conditions: the rear was lagging behind, mud and impassability made it difficult for the timely transfer of heavy artillery, the supply of reinforcements, ammunition and food. “To this we must add the established unusually cold weather - frosts reached 10 °, - recalled M.V. Frunze, - while the vast majority of the troops did not have warm uniforms, they were forced at the same time very often to be located in the open air "3.

Before the start of the operation, M. V. Frunze, with members of the Revolutionary Military Council of the Front, M. K. Vladimirov and I. T. Smilga, toured the troops, visited the headquarters of the armies, where all the details of the upcoming operation and the methods for its implementation were clarified. one

Military Bulletin, 1938, No. 11, p. 33.2

See: M.V. Frunze on the Fronts of the Civil War, p. 424.

Frunze M. V. Selected works. M., 1984, p. 102. The offensive of the Soviet troops began on the night of November 8. The strike group of the 6th Army in 15-degree frost, in icy water, crossed the Sivash along three fords. The communists walked ahead and with them the head of the political department of the 15th Inza Rifle Division, A. A. Yanysheva. Parts of the Shock Group defeated the Kuban brigade and occupied the Lithuanian Peninsula at dawn.

At the same time, a specially created assault column, consisting almost entirely of communists, distinguished itself. The local resident I. I. Olenchuk rendered great help to the Red Army soldiers when crossing the eight-kilometer bay. (During the Great Patriotic War, he repeated his feat, assisting the troops of the 4th Ukrainian Front in forcing the bay.) The White Guard command, which did not expect the offensive of the Soviet troops through the Sivash, removed units of the 1st Army Corps from this direction to replace the badly battered in battles in Northern Tavria units of the 2nd Army Corps. After the Shock Group of the 6th Army crossed to the Lithuanian Peninsula, Wrangel urgently transferred here part of the forces of the 34th Infantry Division and his closest reserve, the 15th Infantry Division, reinforcing them with armored vehicles. However, they could not contain the offensive impulse of the Strike Group, which rushed to the Yushun positions, to the rear of the enemy's Perekop grouping.

On the morning of November 8, after four hours of artillery preparation, units of the 51st Infantry Division, with the support of 15 armored vehicles, began the assault on the Turkish Wall. However, because of the fog, the artillery was unable to reliably suppress the enemy's firepower. During the three frontal attacks of the shaft, the division suffered heavy losses from enemy machine-gun and artillery fire and was forced to lie down in front of the moat. At that time, in the Chongar direction, the troops of the 4th Army were still preparing to go over to the offensive. The offensive of the 9th Rifle Division along the Arabat Spit was thwarted by the fire of enemy ships.

On the afternoon of November 8, the situation on the Lithuanian peninsula became more complicated, as the wind suddenly changed and the water in Sivash began to rise. As a result, there was a threat of complete isolation on the peninsula of the units of the Shock Group of the 6th Army. Having assessed the situation, M.V. Frunze took immediate measures to reinforce the troops in the Perekop direction and the Lithuanian Peninsula. He ordered the 2nd Cavalry Army to concentrate in the Perekop area, and with one division to support the attack of the 51st Infantry Division, which was to immediately resume the assault on the Turkish Wall. Residents of Vladimirovka, Stroganovka and other villages were mobilized to equip the fords across the Sivash. To support the Shock Group 6-

The 7th Cavalry Division of the 2nd Cavalry Army and the cavalry detachment of the Insurrectionary Army were sent to the 1st Army

At four o'clock in the morning on November 9, units of V.K. Blucher's division, during the fourth attack, supported by armored vehicles, under heavy enemy fire, blinded by searchlights, captured the Turkish Wall, skillfully bypassing part of its left flank fording along the western part of the Perekop Bay. The strike group of the 6th Army intensified the onslaught on the Lithuanian Peninsula, which forced the enemy to weaken the defenses in the Perekop directions and begin a retreat to the second lane. By morning, 7-

I was a cavalry division and the Makhnovists, who, together with the 52nd Infantry Division, began to push the Wrangel troops to Yushun. The 15th Rifle and 16th Cavalry Divisions were successfully advancing in the same direction. At the same time, an amphibious assault on boats was landed in the Sudak region, which, together with the Crimean partisans, launched military operations behind enemy lines.

In order to contain the offensive of the Soviet troops, the White Guard command was forced to transfer the 3rd Don Corps to the Yushun positions with the task, together with the Cavalry Corps and the Drozdov Infantry Division, to hold the second line of defense. At this time, the front commander M.V. Frunze went to the headquarters of the 4th Army in order to speed up the transition of its troops to the offensive. On the night of November I, the 30th Rifle Division, in cooperation with the 6th Cavalry Division, despite the heavy fire of enemy machine guns and guns, broke through the Chongar fortifications and began to develop success in the Dzhankoy direction, and the 9th Rifle Division crossed the strait near Genichesk. The enemy had to urgently turn back the 3rd Don Corps to eliminate the breakthrough of the troops of the 4th Army.

The offensive also developed successfully in the Perekop direction. By the evening of November 10, the 52nd Rifle Division reached the third line of the Yushun positions, and the rest of the formations located on the peninsula repelled fierce counterattacks from units of the 1st Army and Cavalry Corps. The 2nd Cavalry Army was transferred to this area, which on November 11 crushed and put to flight the enemy's cavalry corps. This day was a turning point in the Perekop-Chongar operation. The threat of losing the escape route forced the enemy to start a retreat along the entire front.

M. V. Frunze, seeking to avoid further bloodshed, suggested that the Wrangelites stop their resistance, which was already pointless, and lay down their arms. However, Wrangel hid the Soviet proposal from his troops. The enemy, hiding behind strong cavalry rearguards, managed to break away for one or two transitions from the Soviet troops and hastily retreated to the Black Sea ports. Confusion reigned in the White Guard units. The officers fired. The soldiers threw out white flags.

The pursuit of the enemy began. The troops of the 6th Army were advancing on Evpatoria, Simferopol, Sevastopol; behind them was the 1st Cavalry Army. Formations of the 4th Army pursued the enemy, retreating to Feodosia and Kerch, and the 2nd Cavalry Army advanced on Simferopol. From the rear, the Crimean partisans struck at the enemy, whose representative, I. D. Papanin, delivered weapons and ammunition from the headquarters of the Southern Front on a boat. The rebel army, instead of participating in the completion of the defeat of the enemy, took up looting. Therefore, the front command had to allocate part of the forces to neutralize it. Then the Makhnovists left the Crimea and again began the struggle against Soviet power.

In the area of ​​the Kurman-Kemelchi station, the Wrangel troops, with the support of artillery and two armored trains, tried to detain the Soviet troops, but were defeated by formations of the 2nd Cavalry Army. The 2nd Cavalry Brigade of the 21st Cavalry Division, whose commander, M. A. Ekon, especially distinguished himself in this battle, was awarded the Order of the Red Banner. The enemy did not manage to linger at the Dzhankoy station either, where the 2nd Cavalry Division and a separate cavalry brigade of the 2nd Cavalry Army took more than 4,000 prisoners and up to 200 wagons with cargo. After that, the 2nd Cavalry Army began advancing to Simferopol, where, under the leadership of the partisan A. Skripnichenko, an uprising began on November 10 and power passed to the Revolutionary Committee, headed by a member of the Crimean underground regional party committee V. S. Vasiliev449. Two days later, the soldiers of the 2nd Cavalry Army entered Simferopol.

On November 14, the troops of the 4th Army liberated Feodosia, and the troops of the 1st Cavalry and 6th Armies the next day - Sevastopol, where power had passed into the hands of the Revolutionary Committee the day before. On November 16, the 3rd Cavalry Corps liberated Kerch. The troops of the front were greatly assisted by aviation, which struck at enemy ships in the ports of Evpatoria and Feodosia. On November 16, M. V. Frunze and Bela Kun sent a telegram to V. I. Lenin: “Today Kerch is occupied by our cavalry. The southern front has been liquidated"450.

The remnants of the Russian White Guard Army, with the help of the American Red Cross, fled to Constantinople on transport ships under the cover of Entente warships. The flight was so hasty that only people with hand luggage boarded the ships. Fights broke out for places, guns and military equipment rushed in a panic. In total, up to 150,000 people were evacuated from Crimea along with refugees, including about 70,000 officers and soldiers451. The Perekop-Chongar operation ended in victory for the troops of the Southern Front. An important and economically rich region was returned to the country. V. I. Lenin highly appreciated the outstanding victory of the Red Army. He said: “You know, of course, what extraordinary heroism the Red Army showed, overcoming such obstacles and such fortifications that even military experts and authorities considered impregnable. One of the most brilliant pages in the history of the Red Army is that complete, decisive and remarkably quick victory that was won over Wrangel. Thus, the war imposed on us by the White Guards and the imperialists turned out to be liquidated.

The whole country celebrated the victory of the Soviet troops on the Southern Front. On December 24, the Council of Labor and Defense declared gratitude to the troops of the front for selfless courage, exceptional energy and political consciousness in the struggle for the realization of the ideals of the workers' and peasants' revolution. Parades were held in a number of cities in honor of the victory achieved. Such a parade, for example, took place on November 22 in Omsk453. For military merit, more than 40 formations, units and subunits of the Southern Front were awarded the Order of the Red Banner and Honorary Revolutionary Red Banners of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee, and several thousand soldiers, commanders and political workers were awarded the Order of the Red Banner. The formations that especially distinguished themselves in battles received honorary titles: the 15th division - Sivash, the 51st - Perekop, the 30th rifle and 6th cavalry divisions - Chongarsky. In honor of the glorious deeds of the 2nd Cavalry Army, committed during the defeat of the Wrangel troops, a memorial plaque was erected on the building where the headquarters of one of its divisions was located in Nikopol, and an obelisk was erected on the mound of Glory in the village of Sholokhovo. The Soviet troops paid a heavy price for the victory achieved. During the assault on the Perekop and Chongar isthmus alone, about 10,000 soldiers were killed and wounded454 An obelisk was also erected in memory of the heroes who died during the assault on Perekop and Chongar.

Honorary revolutionary weapons were awarded to M. V. Frunze, A. I. Kork, F. K. Mironov, K. E. Voroshilov and N. D. Kashirin. Among those awarded the Order of the Red Banner, a member of the Revolutionary Military Council of the Front, S. I. Gusev; army commanders I. P. Uborevich and V. S. Lazarevich; members of the revolutionary military councils of the armies D. V. Poluyan, K. A. Makoshin; division chiefs I. F. Fedko, S. K. Timoshenko, O. I. Gorodovikov, A. Ya. Parkhomenko, I. I. Raudmets, and I. K. Gryaznov; military commissar of the division M. L. Belotsky; brigade commanders N. P. Kolesov, M. Ya. Germanovich, M. V. Kalmykov, N. V. Medvedev; the military commissar of the regiment (then the brigade) D. A. Vainerkh-Vainyarkh; battalion commander F. D. Rubtsov; head of the communications department of the front N. M. Sinyavsky; artillery battalion commander L. A. Govorov; The second Order of the Red Banner was awarded to the division commander V.K. Blucher and the military commissar of the division A.M. Gordon.

During the fighting (October 28 - November 16, 1920), the troops of the Southern Front captured 52.1 thousand soldiers and officers, captured 276 guns, 7 armored trains, 15 armored cars, 100 locomotives and 34 ships of all types455. The defeat of the Wrangelites marked the complete and final failure of the Entente's last campaign against the Land of the Soviets, the collapse of all the plans of the imperialists to strangle Soviet power by military means. The three-year war in defense of the Great October Revolution against the invasion of imperialist predators and the forces of internal counter-revolution ended in a world-historic victory for the Soviet people. Lenin's order to complete the defeat of the Wrangelites before the onset of winter was fulfilled

The strategic offensive operation of the Southern Front, carried out in a relatively short time (20 days) and to a depth of 350-420 km, can be considered one of the most brilliant operations of the Red Army. It included two front-line offensive operations consistent in depth, united by a single plan. During the first (counteroffensive in Northern Tavria), Soviet troops crossed the Dnieper, broke through the defenses hastily occupied by the enemy on its left bank, defeated the main forces of the Wrangelites in Northern Tavria and reached the Perekop and Chongar isthmuses. The second operation (Perekop-Chongar) was carried out after a short operational pause of four days and included crossing the Sivash, breaking through the heavily fortified Perekop positions, pursuing the retreating enemy, and completely liberating the Crimean peninsula.

Front offensive operations were distinguished by a large scale. In the course of them, there was a continuous buildup of front forces, which made it possible to achieve almost fivefold superiority over the enemy. A feature of the counteroffensive in Northern Tavria was the continuous narrowing of the offensive zone, which was determined both by a form of operational maneuver to encircle (two-sided coverage of the main enemy forces in combination with frontal strikes), and and the configuration of the combat area. The depth of the operation in Northern Tavria was 150-100 km, in Perekop-Chongarskaya - 200-250 km. The operations were completed in a relatively short period of time (7-9 days), with an average advance rate of 25-30 km per day.

Soviet troops have accumulated extensive experience in breaking through well-prepared and well-engineered enemy defenses in hard-to-reach terrain and in very adverse weather conditions. To break through the enemy defenses, special assault columns and strike groups (detachments) were created. A decisive role in the breakthrough was played by a deep operational bypass of the Shock Group of the 6th Army through the Lithuanian Peninsula and part of the forces of the 51st Infantry Division of the enemy’s left flank on the Turkish Wall. The operational formation of troops in the main directions was deeply echeloned. The efforts of the troops of the first echelon were increased by bringing into the breakthrough the second echelons, reserves, mobile groups of the front and the army.

During the breakthrough, artillery and aviation were used centrally, and armored forces - decentralized. In the 6th Army, an artillery group of army significance was created, and as part of its Strike Group, maneuverable batteries, which advanced after the infantry and supported it with fire and wheels.

The main forms of operational maneuver were: in Northern Tavria - encirclement, in the Perekop-Chongar operation - strikes in order to cut the enemy's front and destroy him in parts. The main blow in Northern Tavria was inflicted on the weakest and most vulnerable place in the enemy's defense, and in the Perekop-Chongar operation - from the front on the strongest place in the enemy defense, and the width of the breakthrough section was 25-30 percent of the total width of the offensive front.

The most important condition for achieving the complete defeat of the enemy was the superiority of the Southern Front in cavalry, the close interaction of all branches of the armed forces with each other and with aviation.

  • 4. The CCP AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE Liberated Areas The Liberated Areas and the CCP Military During the War
  • SITUATION IN UKRAINE In 1920, characterized by the end of the civil war (Soviet-Polish war, the defeat of Wrangel's army in the Crimea, the Petliura and White Guard troops on the Right Bank of Ukraine), the policy of the Bolsheviks in the field of economics - war communism. The Civil War is the greatest drama of the 20th century. This armed struggle that lasted for several years between various groups of the population, with the active intervention

    foreign forces, went through various stages and stages, took various forms, including uprisings, rebellions, scattered clashes, large-scale military operations with the participation of regular armies, the actions of armed detachments in the rear of existing governments and state entities. The war was fought on fronts, the total length of which reached 8 thousand km. The result - economic ruin, famine in cities, paralysis of railways, acute class struggle, revelry

    banditry, sabotage, etc. The Soviet-Polish war - the civil war was ending, but at that time a new threat appeared - now from Poland. In the policy of pushing neighboring states to war against the Republic of Soviets by the Entente countries, Poland occupied not the last place. The coalition has repeatedly sought to influence

    Poland so that it would provide more active assistance to the White Guard armies, especially during Denikin's campaign against Moscow. With their help, 740 thousand Polish army was armed, which in April 1920 launched an offensive against Ukraine, occupied Zhytomyr and Kyiv. The result - fierce hostilities on the Polish front ended with a peace treaty signed on October 12, 1920. "War Communism" - domestic politics

    Soviet state in the conditions of the Civil War. The policy of "War Communism" was aimed at overcoming the economic crisis and was based on theoretical ideas about the possibility of the direct introduction of communism. Main features: nationalization of all large and medium industry and most of the small enterprises; food dictatorship, surplus appropriation, direct product exchange between town and countryside; replacement

    private trade in the state distribution of products on a class basis (card system); naturalization of economic relations; universal labor service; equality in wages; military command system for managing the entire life of society. The main elements of "war communism" Centralized management of the nationalized industry. Private property was abolished altogether, and a state monopoly of foreign trade was established.

    A strict sectoral system of industrial management was introduced. Violent cooperation. At the direction of the party, individual peasant farms were united into collective farms, and state farms were created. The Decree on Land was actually cancelled. The land fund was transferred not to the working people, but to communes, state farms, and labor artels. The individual peasant could only use the remnants of the land fund.

    Equal distribution Naturalization of wages. The Bolsheviks viewed socialism as a commodityless and moneyless society. This led to the abolition of the market and commodity-money relations. Any non-state trade was prohibited. The policy of "war communism" led to the destruction of commodity-money relations. Products and manufactured goods were distributed by the state in the form of natural rations,

    which was different for different categories of the population. Equal wages were introduced among workers (an illusion of social equality). As a result, speculation and the "black market" flourished. The depreciation of money led to the fact that the population received free housing, utilities, transport, postal and other services. The militarization of labor. From January 1920, labor armies began to be created by transferring

    active armies on the labor position and the association of reserve and reserve troops. Industrial enterprises have increased the length of the working day and introduced a seven-day working week. Enterprises worked according to military laws, and all workers were considered mobilized, for absenteeism or unauthorized leaving of the workplace, people were tried according to the laws of war. Prodrazvyorstka - the obligatory delivery of all surplus food by the peasants to the state on a firm basis.

    price. However, in fact it was a confiscation of food: the money was completely devalued; moreover, not only surpluses were confiscated, but often the seed fund, and what the peasant left to feed his family. The authorities also determined the norms for the supply of agricultural products by the village not so much based on the capabilities of the village, but on the needs of the army and the urban population. From the beginning of 1919, the surplus was introduced for bread,

    1920 - for potatoes, vegetables, etc. Prodrazverstka was implemented by violent methods with the help of food detachments. Food detachments - food detachments (mostly armed) of workers and poor peasants and fighters of the CHON. Conducted surplus appraisal in the countryside; acted jointly with the committees and local Soviets. They were created by the bodies of the People's Commissariat for Food (they were part of the Prodarmia), trade unions, factory committees, local Soviets (procurement, harvesting and procurement,

    harvesting and requisitioning detachments; head of the Military Food Bureau of the All-Union Central Council of Trade Unions); half of the collected grain was received by the organization that sent the detachment. The policy of "war communism" caused mass discontent among the general population, especially the peasantry. Peasants in entire villages organized detachments to combat sub-detachments. The disarmament of the Red Army detachments by the peasants was not uncommon.

    Numerous protests by workers and peasants against the policy of "War Communism" showed its complete collapse, and in 1921 the New Economic Policy (NEP) was introduced. Liberation of the Crimea In the autumn of 1920, all the forces of Red Russia were mobilized against the prosperous White Crimea. But he has become a tough nut to crack. The Russian army consisted of experienced, well-trained soldiers and

    officers (there were about 80 thousand), it was headed by an authoritative and talented leader, in the Perekop area, albeit not capital, but quite reliable fortifications were built, which were defended by strong artillery. However, more than a million people moved to the Crimea, which included the famous and very effective "flying carts" of the army of N. Makhno, who by this time had concluded a peace treaty with the "Reds" that was beneficial for himself. But as it turned out later, the advice was not going to be carried out, and after

    the capture of the Crimea, the "Makhnovists" who participated in this operation were treacherously killed. I will not write about the fierce battles of the Russian army with the Reds in Tavria, about its retreat to the isthmus, an entire literature is devoted to this. But even then, the position of the Crimea remained quite strong ... But then two unexpected events coincided in time - a rather rare cataclysm of nature and an appeal to whites

    soldiers of General Brusilov, widely distributed by the Bolsheviks in the form of leaflets, which scattered thousands of red planes from the air ... First, about the whim of nature. In early November, a strong and steady north wind blew over the peninsula. The sea bays around the Perekop Isthmus began to shallow - the wind drove the water out of them to the south, to the sea. Some bays became so shallow that it was possible to ford them

    On the night of November 7-8, the shock group of the 6th Red Army took advantage of this and in three places crossed the "rotten sea" - Sivash. Red Army soldiers carried rifles over their heads. Having made an eight-kilometer transition, the Soviet units reached the northern tip of the Lithuanian Peninsula, broke through the wire barriers, defeated the Kuban brigade of General M.A. Fostikov and cleared almost the entire

    Lithuanian peninsula and hit the rear of the Whites. Parts of the 15th and 52nd divisions reached the Perekop isthmus and moved to the Ishun positions. The counterattack launched on the morning of November 8 by the 2nd and 3rd infantry regiments of the Drozdov division was repulsed. The center of the terrible battles of those days was the famous Turkish Wall crossing the isthmus. Here, in front of the Turkish Wall, they lay down in the ground under blows many times

    superior enemy, the best, selected units of the Russian army. Here, by the way, the historical regiments of the Imperial Russian Guard, formed back in the times of Peter the Great, ended their combat path. This is how the last battle of historical regiments was described by a participant in this battle, and later an emigrant D.I. Meisner: “... We were attacked by the red cavalry and horse batteries opened fire on us.

    The remnants of the historical regiments of the old guard, marching with us, made an attempt to beat off the attack. Officers in fur hats with guard stars on them, with shoulder straps sewn into their overcoats so that there was no temptation to tear them off, tall, outwardly calm and confident, began to build chains of soldiers, giving the command to prepare for battle. These were officers of the once famous regiments - Preobrazhensky, Izmailovsky, Semenovsky ... But by that time three of these regiments remained

    four officers and two or three ensigns with many St. George's crosses ... I saw with my own eyes the last battle of the guards regiments ... ". And a day later, the Red troops broke through the last fortified positions of the Whites on the isthmus and rushed to Dzhankoy. The fate of the Crimea was decided. But the victory of the Soviet troops was won at a heavy price.

    Only during the assault on Perekop and Chongar, the troops of the Southern Front lost 10 thousand people killed and wounded. The divisions that distinguished themselves during the assault on the Crimean fortifications were given honorary titles: the 15th - "Sivashskaya", the 30th rifle and 6th cavalry - "Chongarskaya", the 51st - "Perekopskaya". ... The tragedy of the Crimea, and consequently, the White movement can be explained by several reasons.

    Firstly, the forces of the Reds were very large, they were incomparable with the forces of the Russian army of Baron Wrangel. Secondly, Russia's allies in the Entente actually refused to help the Whites, fearing to complicate relations with Soviet Russia in the future. Thirdly, in October the Soviet government signed a peace treaty with Poland, which made it possible to transfer well-trained and fired troops from the West to the South.

    And finally, General A.A. Brusilov signed a defeatist appeal to the Russian army. It is not for us to judge the illustrious hero of the Great War, the most authoritative commander, whose name is given to the most successful offensive operation of the Russian troops - the Brusilovsky breakthrough ... God's servant Alexei will answer for his act before the Lord's Court. And he called on the White fighters "to lay down their arms and not shed brotherly blood", promising

    create the Crimean Red Army under his command, where they will all be accepted in the same ranks ... Numerous leaflets signed by Frunze and Lenin, who promised a complete amnesty to all the ranks of the Wrangel army who lay down their arms and remain in their homeland, were added to this appeal. Needless to say, all these promises turned out to be empty words ... Pyotr Nikolaevich Wrangel Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Army, Lieutenant General, Baron

    Pyotr Nikolaevich Wrangel Briefly Wrangel Pyotr Nikolaevich, baron (1878 - 1928). Coming from a noble family of Swedish origin, he studies as a mining engineer, then enters the military service, participates in the Russo-Japanese War, and later, already during the First World War, distinguished himself in East Prussia and Galicia. After the October Revolution, refusing to go to the service of the Ukrainian hetman Skoropadsky, who was supported by the Germans, he joined in 1918

    Volunteer army. In April 1920, he became Denikin's successor, when he, having retreated to the Crimea, left the command of the White Army. On March 22, 1920, General Wrangel arrived in Sevastopol on the English battleship Emperor of India. The Military Council of the Armed Forces of the South of Russia met. The meeting was short-lived - nineteen of the most prominent generals who headed the formations and headquarters

    The White Army, unanimously spoke out: General Baron Wrangel should be the new Commander-in-Chief. Pyotr Nikolayevich himself made an addition to the minutes of the meeting of the Military Council: “I shared the glory of victories with the Army and I cannot refuse to drink the cup of humiliation with it. Drawing strength from the support of my old associates, I agree to accept the position of Commander-in-Chief. Lieutenant General Baron P. Wrangel March 22, 1920

    Sevastopol". Having taken command, General Wrangel first of all began to restore discipline and strengthen the morale of the troops. By April 28, 1920, he reorganized them into the Russian Army. And along with the restoration of its combat capability, he began to vigorously rebuild the Crimean economy and social policy in it. Taking care of the troops is the first concern of any commander, but Wrangel was also a senior administrative head in

    Crimea. And in this capacity, he showed himself from an unexpected side for his subordinates. The general became a wise administrator, a consistent politician and a diligent business executive. Under his patronage, Wrangel created the civil government of the Crimea and appointed A.V. Krivoshein as its head. General P.N. Wrangel, chairman of the civil government

    Kryma A.V. Krivoshein and General P.N. Shatilov. 1920 A.V. Krivoshein was a man of great ability and colossal experience in economic affairs. Once he was a friend of the Minister of Finance of Russia, managed the largest banks, for eight years he was the Chief Manager of Land Management and Agriculture of the Empire. It was Krivoshein that Pyotr Arkadyevich Stolypin instructed at one time to put into practice the famous

    agrarian reform. This is the kind of person General Wrangel appointed Chairman of the Government of the South of Russia. And the South of Russia was then the Crimea. The government of the South of Russia created by him, which is recognized by France, issued a declaration on the national question and proposed to determine the form of government in Russia by "free will" within the framework of a broad federation.

    Along with this, the government launched a series of reforms, A.V. Krivoshein and his subordinates knew how to work. In just three weeks, they developed new principles for relations between peasants and landowners, peasants and authorities. The Crimean government clearly benefited from Krivoshein's experience in implementing the Stolypin land reform. Crimea in 1920 became, as it were, a testing ground, on which Stolypin's ideas were fully introduced on a small scale.

    principles of reforming Russia. In practice, this meant that the land was not in words, as was the case in Soviet Russia, but in fact was transferred to those who work on it, the peasants, "into eternal and hereditary property", that the big farmers were left only what was in addition to peasant allotments, that the peasant was declared the full owner of what he had grown on his land. The new Crimean government acted decisively and quickly.

    Already at the end of April, land was cut into the peasants - plots of fertile Crimean land. And on May 25, 1920, the orders of General Wrangel “On the Land”, “On Volost Zemstvos” that had the force of the Law for the Crimea, were published. The Crimean reform has acquired a legislative basis. The swift actions of the authorities had almost instantaneous effect.

    the peasants hurried to take advantage of their new property. At the height of summer, the harvest ripened, and the military authorities began to purchase the amount of bread needed for the army at favorable prices for the peasants. The surplus was freely sold on the market. And what happened then was called the "Crimean miracle" - an abundance of bread, as it were, started the engine of the Crimean economy, small and even medium-sized industries started working on the peninsula, new jobs appeared,

    shops opened, goods appeared, markets rustled ... Crimea came to life! Here is what the well-known politician and writer Vasily Vitalyevich Shulgin, who secretly came there from Red Odessa, wrote about those days of Crimea: “... The streets are full of people and what kind of people, the former and even prettier ones, cabbies, cars, announcements of concerts and lectures. But most importantly, shops - they have everything you want ...

    I was convinced, for example, that if we measure the earnings of an Odessa and Crimean worker, then the first one can buy two and a half poods of grain in the red country for his wages, and his Crimean comrade - five poods and more ... ". The position of the Crimea seemed especially strong after taking advantage of the outbreak of war with Poland, the Russian army carried out a successful offensive operation against the Bolsheviks and captured part of the Tauride lands adjacent to the peninsula.

    In 1920, Crimea was the only territory in Europe that exported bread to the external market - to Constantinople and beyond ... So, under General Wrangel, Crimea became a "showcase of well-being" facing the whole of Russia, became a reproach to the red Kremlin. Such "propaganda by deed" was dangerous for the Bolsheviks. Crimea threatened to become an example of how life can and should be arranged...

    That is why a hysterical campaign was launched in Soviet Russia against the White Crimea, against General Wrangel, whom they began to represent as "the main threat to the young republic of soviets." Everything was mobilized, even Mayakovsky, who in those days wrote the scurrilous "Tale of how a woman alone talked about Wrangel without any mind." The armistice between Soviet Russia and Poland changed the situation.

    At the end of October, five red armies of the Southern Front (commander M. Frunze), including two cavalry armies (the total number of front troops - over 130 thousand people), attacked the Russian army of Wrangel. In a week they liberated Northern Tavria, and then, breaking through the Perekop fortifications, moved to the Crimea. To Wrangel's credit, he skillfully led the withdrawal of his troops and managed to prepare in advance

    to evacuation. Not wanting to leave the Russian army in trouble, Wrangel spent about a year with her in Turkey, maintaining order in the troops and fighting hunger. His subordinates gradually dispersed, about seven thousand deserted and left for Russia. At the end of 1921, the remnants of the army were transferred to Bulgaria and Yugoslavia, where many soldiers and officers later settled, others were further drawn by fate.

    Instead of the collapsed Russian army, Wrangel founded the Russian All-Military Union (ROVS) in Paris with departments in the countries where there were former officers and members of the White movement. The ROVS was distinguished by its irreconcilable attitude towards Soviet Russia, developed plans for the mobilization of its members at the right time, conducted intelligence work, had a combat department (headed by Kutepov), which prepared armed actions in

    USSR. Wrangel did not stop fighting the Bolsheviks until his death, which befell him at the age of 49, in 1928 (according to one of the unproven versions, he was poisoned). From Brussels, where he died, his body was transported to Yugoslavia and solemnly buried in one of the Orthodox cathedrals. A procession with wreaths stretched through Belgrade. After the death of Wrangel, two volumes of his "Notes" were published, published in

    Berlin. Belgrade. Church of the Holy Trinity, where the second and last grave of P.N. Wrangel List of references Used materials of the book: Kovalevsky N.F. History of Russian Goverment. Biographies of famous military leaders of the 18th - early 20th centuries. M. 1997 Vashchenko P.F. Runov V.A. The revolution is defended: [On the 70th anniversary of the defeat of the troops

    Related content
    • Golovna Ruska Rada
    • Western Ukrainian lands within the Austrian monarchy
    • The Dnieper Ukraine in the second half of the 19th century.
    The brutal national oppression caused the strengthening of the national liberation movement in Western Ukrainian lands. Its manifestation was various socio-political currents that arose in the circles of the Ukrainian clergy, intelligentsia, students and industrialists, a numerous and influential trend in socio-political thought and in the liberation movement of Western Ukraine were “Muscovites” (Moscow Volunteers) or Russophiles or “solid Rusyns”, as they were also called. The social base of the “Muscovites” was the clergy, the intelligentsia, rural and urban entrepreneurs, some of the wealthy peasants who despaired that they could free themselves and make their people free without outside help. government circles of tsarist Russia. They developed a false theory about the existence of an allegedly "single indivisible Russian people" from the Carpathians to Kamchatka, "Moskvophiles" had a sharply negative attitude towards the Ukrainian folk language, considered it vulgar, and they themselves spoke and wrote in the so-called "Russian" or "Pan-Russian" language - with a wild mixture of Russian, Ukrainian, Polish and Church Slavonic words, the Muscovites disliked the folk language so much that they gladly welcomed the Emsky decree of 1876. By the way, they themselves used the Polish language in everyday life, saying that Ukrainian was a peasant language, and German and Russian they did not know the True opinion about the reunification of the lands of all Ukraine "Muscovites" cancel their flirting with the bloody Russian tsarism. They instilled tsarefil sentiments, praised autocracy as the most suitable state form for the Slavs. In their works, the ideologists of the "Muscophiles" Diditsky, Petrushevich, Mogilnitsky propagandized the reactionary ideas of Russian Slavophiles - A. Khomyak Iakov and S. Aksakov. For some time, the central organ of the “Muscovites,” the Slovo newspaper, was subsidized by the Russian monarchy. In fact, the "Muscovites" were bribed by tsarism. On the one hand, they were guided by the autocracy, and on the other hand, denying the free development of the Ukrainian people, they supported the Austrian reaction, implemented the Caesar's policy. Perhaps the only useful thing they did was the fight against drunkenness and the formation of sobriety fraternity "Moskvophiles" had their own institutions, societies, printed books. periodicals, ancient acts. "Solid Rusyns" took over the oldest Galician Ukrainian institutions - the Stavropegic Institute (former brotherhood), the People's House, the publishing house "Galician-Russian Matytsia", "The Society of them. M. Kachkovsky "and other Russophiles also owned numerous newspapers, published at different times in Galicia, Bukovina and Transcarpathia -" Galicia "," Light "," Bukovina Star "and others. In 1870, to coordinate their work, they founded a political organization - the Russian Rada, which began to express claims to the national wire in Galicia. The advanced Ukrainian youth could not be satisfied with the slogans of "solid Rusyns", they are offended by the neglect of the Ukrainian language, the Ukrainian past. Having the “Basis” as a model, the works of T.G. Shevchenko, P. Kulish, O. Konissky and N. Kostomarov, the progressive activity of communities and Ukrainophiles, Galician students, young priests, born after the revolution of 1848, the intelligentsia abandoned the wire of the “Muscovites” and began to focus not on the Russian tsar, but to look for strength and support among their own Ukrainian people. Hence their pyx i got the name "populists". Initially, the Narodniks carried out extensive educational and cultural work. They founded the Ukrainian theater in Lvov, the Literary Society. T.G. Shevchenko (1873), educational organization "Enlightenment", society "Russian conversation". Narodovtsy issued periodicals, books, magazines. their ideologists were A. Barvinsky, K. Levitsky and others, who gradually turned the populist group into a close alliance with a pronounced national program. Narodovtsy issued the magazines "Vechernitsy", "Meta", "Mermaid". The organs of this direction of the liberation movement were the newspapers Pravda, Delo, Bukovina. Narodovtsy maintained close ties with the Dnieper communities (Ukrainophiles), enjoyed their financial, cultural and spiritual support. The Dnieper writers were published in populist publications, and Antonovich, Kulish and Kostomarov specially traveled to Galicia to establish personal ties with the leaders of the populist movement. But the ideas of M. Drahomanov's socialism were not accepted by the people. Nevertheless, under the influence of the delimitation of the Ukrainian organizations in the Dnieper region, polarization also took place among the populists - a more energetic left wing and a more inert right wing, inclined to agree with the government, stood out. The People's Council, established in 1885, became the authorized representative central body of the populists. In November 1890, the populist leaders Alexander Barvinsky, Kost Levitsky and Yulian Romanchuk, supported by V. Antonovich, concluded an agreement with the Austrian governor in Galicia. According to its terms, the Narodovtsy undertook to support the Austro-Hungarian and Polish authorities in Western Ukraine in return for the opening of three Ukrainian gymnasiums, several departments of Ukrainian studies at Lviv University and the provision of permanent seats in parliament. Although the government did not fully comply with the agreement, a “new era” began in the activities of the populists - an era of peaceful coexistence with the Polish gentry and support for the policy of Vienna. The ideas of M. Dragomanov, who lived at that time in Geneva and was now closer and accessible to the Galician intelligentsia, more began to penetrate into its environment and find adherents. His followers, who sought to carry out a social revolution and, as a result, liberate Ukraine, considered their program the third decisive, or radical way. That is why they called themselves radicals. The most active and consistent supporters of the socialist ideas of M. Drahomanov and his "Hromada" were students of the Lviv University Ivan Franko and Mikhail Pavlyk Ivan Franko (1856-1916) was born in the village of Nahuevichy near Drohobych in a peasant family. Studied at Lviv and Chernivtsi universities. Throughout his life, being engaged in science, literature and living from this work, waging a constant struggle for the national liberation of Ukraine, Franko tried to repay his debts to his native people, who gave him an education. “Being the son of a Ukrainian peasant,” he wrote, “nourished by black peasant bread and the labor of calloused peasant hands, I must pay with the labor of my life for her pennies, which were spent by a peasant’s hand, so that I could climb to the peaks, from where a clear light spills, breath freedom and human ideals ”In 1876, Franko and M. Pavlik began editing the student publication “Friend”, in which they criticize both “Muscovites” and populists for the low level of their literature, for conservatism. Like-minded people are quickly found, forming a small but rather active group of radicals in the Ukrainian national liberation movement. In 1878, when Franko and Pavlik were arrested and tried for subversive activities, Ivan Yakovlevich wrote a poem “To Comrades from Prison”, outlining the program goal of the radicals. one and the same, but the difference between them is purely formal. Either one has the upper hand or the second - there is no benefit for the people » Ivan Franko was imprisoned three times for participating in the national liberation movement, was not allowed to graduate from Lviv University, was not allowed to be elected a deputy of the Austrian parliament and the Galician Sejm, was not allowed to head the department in Lviv University. But he did not leave the struggle. A peculiar manifestation of the national liberation movement was the organization of "Enlightenment" - a cultural and educational institution. The first "Enlightenment" was founded in December 1868 p. y Lvov populists. The basis of the activities of "Enlightenment" was the spread of education among the people in their native language. Subsequently, she began to publish textbooks, works by Ukrainian writers, newspapers, organize choirs, drama circles, libraries, theaters, folk reading rooms, which began to compete with the tavern and the church. Radicals organized sports and fire societies "Sich" and "Falcon", in which peasant youths underwent sports training, learned self-discipline and patriotism. The cooperative movement, which was financed by "Enlightenment" and rich Ukrainians, was widely spread in Galicia and Bukovina. Cooperatives such as "People's Trade", "Farmer", "Vera", the insurance company "Dniester" accustomed Ukrainians to economic activity, ousting Jews from this industry. At the end of the 19th century. political parties from various social movements in Western Ukraine begin to consolidate. In 1890, the left-wing Narodovtsy and radicals, consisting of I. Franko and M. Pavlik, created the first Ukrainian Radical Party with a program for the formation of an independent Ukrainian state. The radicals led the fight against the "Muscovites" and right-wing populists, who made a deal with the Austrian government. They carried out active work among the peasants and the national intelligentsia, demanded political freedoms, the introduction of public ownership of land, and universal suffrage. In 1899 the Radical Party collapsed. 3 it was organized by the National Democratic Party, which included most of the radicals, including Professor of Lviv University Mykhailo Hrushevsky and Ivan Franko. In the same 1899 p. In Lvov, a group of left-wing radicals created the Social Democratic Party of Galicia. The party leadership adopted the program of the Austrian Social Democrats. The Galician social democracy was weak and worked chiefly among the peasants. At the same time, the politically biased clergy organized themselves and created a conservative, Vienna-oriented party, the Catholic-Russian Union. By the beginning of the 19th century. Ukrainian national and land symbols were distinguished by decorativeness and diversity. Torn between two predatory empires, deprived of the power of its own statehood, Ukraine has not developed a single unified symbolism. The need for it appeared on the Ukrainian lands in 30-40 pp. 19th century in connection with the revival of the national liberation movement. In addition, it was possible to develop it only in the western Ukrainian lands, since the Russian monarchy did not allow anything like this, keeping the Ukrainian ones in the “black body” 1848 p., when the Galician intelligentsia creates the Main Russian Rada, its leaders, having turned to the Ukrainian military traditions to the historical heritage of the Galicia-Volyn principality and the Russian province, adopted such national symbols of Galicia: coat of arms - a golden lion on a blue background, which was matched by a blue flag with a golden lion An attempt to choose which of the songs to be the Ukrainian anthem also dates back to this time. First, the Galicians sang the patriotic song "God grant, good luck" as an anthem. In 1848, the Main Russian Rada approved as the national anthem of the Galician Ukrainians the poem by T. Gushalevich “Peace to you, brothers, we bring to everyone” 1863 p. The Lvov magazine "Meta" published a poem "Ukraine has not yet died" with the signature - T. Shevchenko. In fact, the author was the Kievan ethnographer P. Chubinsky. In the same year, composer M. Verbitsky wrote music, and poetry became the national Ukrainian anthem At the celebrations of the Ukrainian intelligentsia and Ukrainian social-political formations at the end of the 19th century. next to the performance of the mentioned hymn songs, the yellow-blue flag is increasingly raised. It is also used by the church - Orthodox and Greek Catholic Various political circles, parties, organizations - both in Eastern and Western Ukraine - take national symbols into service in order to emphasize both their national identity and aspirations for national self-determination
    Education ZUNR and its activities
    Related content
    • Proclamation of the West Ukrainian People's Republic (ZUNR). Connection of the UNR and ZUNR
    In the autumn of 1918, as a result of deep socio-economic, political, national contradictions, aggravated to the limit by the loss in the First World War, the Austro-Hungarian Empire collapsed. New sovereign states appeared on the political map of Europe: the Republic of Austria (November 12), the Western Ukrainian People's Republic (November 13), the Czechoslovak Republic (November 14), the Hungarian Republic (November 16), the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes (December 1, since 1929 Yugoslavia) and others. Thus, ZUNR became one of the first state formations that arose on the ruins of the so-called "patchwork" Austro-Hungarian Empire. This was preceded by important events that require at least a brief analysis. On October 18, 1918, representatives of all political Ukrainian forces of the region, the so-called Ukrainian Constituent Assembly (Constituent Assembly), gathered in Lvov. Having realized the people's right to self-determination, the Constituent Assembly proclaimed itself the Ukrainian National Council under the powers of the Parliament. It included 33 Ukrainian ambassadors to the Austrian parliament, 34 deputies of Galicia and 16 - to the Bukovina Regional Seims and 3 representatives from the national democratic, Christian public and social democratic parties and student youth. E. Petrushevich was elected the Chairman of the National Council. On October 19, it was proclaimed the creation of the Ukrainian state of the Austro-Hungarian Empire from the Ukrainian territories, however, as part of the monarchy, with which the Galician politicians of the older generation did not dare to break the ties. The great illusion of the leading Galician politicians was the opinion that the fate of the Western state was decided in Vienna, to which a delegation of the Ukrainian National Council went. They hoped for a legitimate transfer of power to them by the grace of the emperor. Meanwhile, in Krakow, a Polish liquidation commission was formed, which should arrive in Lvov on November 1 to take power in Galicia into the hands of Poland. Under these conditions, delay on the part of the Ukrainian could turn into a disaster. Therefore, on the night of October 31 to November 1, led by the centurion of the OSS D. Vitovsky, power in Lvov was taken. The operation was carried out with lightning speed and without bloodshed. The governor and the city commandant were arrested, all state institutions, barracks and other important objects were taken under control, a blue-yellow flag was hoisted over the town hall. As part of the Ukrainian military forces, which took power over the two hundred thousandth Lviv, there were only about 2.5 thousand people. human. On the morning of November 1, the Ukrainian National Council took power into its own hands. The appeal "Ukrainian people" was issued, which spoke about the formation of an independent Ukrainian state, in which "from now on the people are ... the master of their land." On November 9, at a meeting of the Ukrainian National Council, the name of the state was determined as the West Ukrainian People's Republic (ZUNR). It covered about 70 thousand km2 with 6 million population (71% Ukrainian, 14% Poles, 13% Jews and others). True, soon Northern Bukovina was captured by Romania, and Transcarpathia - by Czechoslovakia. Thus, ZUNR covered only the territory of Eastern Galicia with 4 million people. On the same day (November 9), a government was formed - the State Secretariat, consisting of 14 state secretaries (ministries). K. Levitsky was elected Chairman (Prime Minister). On November 13, the UNRada adopted the “Temporary Basic Law on the State Independence of the Ukrainian Lands of the Former Austro-Hungarian Empire”, composed of the following articles: name, borders, state sovereignty, state patronage, coat of arms and flag. This law consolidated the supremacy and sovereignty of the people, which must exercise them through their representative bodies, elected on the basis of universal, equal, direct, secret suffrage according to the proportional system. The coat of arms of the ZUNR was a golden lion on a blue field, the flag - blue-yellow, the anthem - the song "Ukraine has already risen" ("Ukraine has not yet died"). Power was easier to win than to keep. The Polish leadership did not accept the formation of the ZUNR. Already from the first days of November, armed clashes broke out between Ukrainian and Polish detachments on the streets of Lvov. The fighting took place with varying success, and on the night of November 22, Ukrainian units were forced to leave Lvov. The ZUNR government moved to Ternopil, and from January 1919 to Stanislav. January 22, 1919 in Kyiv on Sophia Square was solemnly proclaimed the Act of the reunification of the ZUNR and the UNR. Unfortunately, a real unification did not happen, because a few days later the Directory was forced to leave Kyiv under the blows of the Red Army advancing from the northeast. At the same time, the army of the ZUNR UGA fought with the Polish army, which prevailed in combat strength and equipment. On July 16-18, 1919, the UGA crossed the city of Zbruch, leaving the whole of Eastern Galicia under Polish occupation. So, the heroic attempt of the Ukrainian people to gain freedom, to build their own state, failed. However, the struggle was not in vain. With constant military devastation, the government ZUNR managed to establish the administration of the region, ensure the functioning of schools, post office, telegraph, railway and adopt a number of laws: "On the provisional administration and organization of courts" (November 16, 1918), "On the state language" (November 15, 1918 ), “On the fulfillment of civil rights and obligations” (April 8, 1919), “On land reform” (April 14, 1919), “Law on elections to the unicameral Seimas of the ZO UNR” (April 16, 1919), “On an eight-hour working day "(April 12, 1919), etc. We should agree with the opinion of the historian I. Lysyak-Rudnitsky that the significance of the ZUNR lies in the fact that "Galicia in 1918-1919 is the only example of the Ukrainian state legal order in recent history"

    Politics of "War Communism" (1918 - 1920)

    POLICY OF WAR COMMUNISM 1918 - 1920 The Civil War set before the Bolsheviks the task of creating a huge army, the maximum mobilization of all resources, and hence the maximum centralization of power and subordinating it to the control of all spheres of the state's life. At the same time, the tasks of wartime coincided with the ideas of the Bolsheviks about socialism as a non-commodity, non-market centralized society. As a result, the policy of war communism pursued by the Bolsheviks

    in 1918-1920, it was built, on the one hand, on the experience of state regulation of economic relations during the First World War in Russia and Germany, on the other hand, on utopian ideas about the possibility of a direct transition to market-free socialism in the face of the expectation of a world revolution, which ultimately led to the acceleration of the pace socio-economic transformations in the country during the Civil War. The main elements of the policy of war communism.

    In November 1918, the pro-army was dissolved and by a decree of January 11, 1919. surplus appropriation was carried out. The decree on land was practically canceled. The land fund was transferred not to all the workers, but, first of all, to state farms and communes, and secondly, to labor gangs and partnerships for the joint cultivation of the land, TOZs. Based on the decree of July 28, 1918, by the summer of 1920 up to 80 large and medium enterprises were nationalized. Decree of the Council of People's Commissars of July 22, 1918 on speculation prohibited any non-state trade.

    By the beginning of 1919, private trading enterprises were completely nationalized or closed. After the end of the Civil War, the transition to the full naturalization of economic relations was completed. During the Civil War, a centralized state and party structure was created. Glavkism became the peak of centralization. In 1920, there were 50 central offices subordinate to the Supreme Economic Council, coordinating related industries and distributing finished products -

    Glavtorf, Glavkozha, Glavkrakhmal, etc. Consumer cooperation was also centralized and subordinated to the People's Commissariat for Food. During the period of war communism wasintroduced universal labor service, the militarization of labor. The results of the policy of war communism. As a result of the policy of war communism, social and economic conditions were created for the victory of the Soviet Republic over the interventionists and the Whites. At the same time, the war and the policy of war communism had grave consequences for the country's economy.

    By 1920, the national income fell from 11 to 4 billion rubles compared with 1913, the production of large-scale industry was 13 of the pre-war level, including heavy industry - 2-5. The food requisition led to a reduction in the sowing and gross harvest of the main agricultural crops. Agricultural output in 1920 amounted to two-thirds of the pre-war level. In 1920-1921. famine broke out in the country. The unwillingness to endure the surplus appraisal led to the creation of insurgent

    foci in the Middle Volga region, on the Don, Kuban. Basmachi did not activate in Turkestan. In February - March 1921, the West Siberian rebelscreated armed formations of several thousand people. On March 1, 1921, a rebellion broke out in Kronstadt, during which political slogans were put forward Power to the Soviets, not to parties Soviets without Bolsheviks

    socialism. After a broad discussion in late 1920 - early 1921, with the X Congress of the RCP on March 6, 1921, a gradual abolition of the policy of military communism began. References1. Gimpelson E. D. War communism M 2. Civil war in the USSR. T. 1-2 M 3. History of the Fatherland people, ideas, decisions. History essays

    NEP and features of its implementation in Ukraine
    Related content
    • Cultural and Spiritual Life in Ukraine in the 1920s-1930s pp.
    • New economic policy
    The New Economic Policy (NEP) is a new direction in the domestic policy of the Soviet state, approved by the RCP (b) congress in March 1921. This was a temporary retreat of the Bolsheviks from the general line of the party. The essence of the NEP was the use of market relations and various forms of ownership. The main event of the NEP was the replacement of the surplus tax in kind in the countryside. Contents: 1. Introduction of a new economic policy. 1.1. Reasons for the transition to a new economic policy. 1.2. Introduction of the tax. 1.3. The essence of the NEP. 2. Features of the NEP in Ukraine. 3. Cancellation of the NEP. 3.1. The inconsistency of the new economic policy. 3.2. NEP Crises. 3.3. The attack on the NEP by state bodies. 1. Introduction of a new economic policy. 1.1. Reasons for the transition to a new economic policy. . The main reasons for the transition to a new economic policy were: - deep socio-economic and political crisis of the Bolshevik regime; - total economic ruin, a sharp reduction in industrial and agricultural production; - mass uprisings of peasants, workers, soldiers and sailors; - political and economic isolation of the Bolsheviks in the international arena; - the decline of the world communist movement, not justifying the hopes of the Bolsheviks for a world revolution; - trying to hold on to power by any means. One of the significant factors that prompted the Bolsheviks to change their domestic policy was Kronstadt uprising. The performance of the Baltic sailors showed that the policy of the Bolsheviks began to lose support even among those sections of society that had been the backbone of Soviet power from the very beginning. The Bolsheviks were threatened with a complete loss of control over the country. 1.2. The introduction of a tax in kind. In March 1921, the X Congress of the RCP (b) proclaimed the replacement of the food distribution food tax. This was the first and most important step towards the new economic policy. The New Economic Policy is a new direction in the domestic policy of the Soviet state, approved by the 10th Congress of the RCP(b). This was a temporary retreat of the Bolsheviks from the general line of the party. The essence of NEP consisted in the use of elements of market relations and various forms of ownership. In fact, the NEP meant the transition from administrative-command to self-supporting socialism. main event NEP was the replacement of the surplus tax in kind in the countryside. 1.3. The essence of the NEP. The X Congress of the RCP (b) approved the resolution "On the replacement of the layout with a tax in kind." The main measures of the NEP were: - replacement of the surplus appraisal with a tax in kind; at the same time, the tax in kind should be less than the surplus appropriation, and its size was reported to the peasants in advance; - Poor peasants were generally exempted from the tax; - after paying the tax, the peasants received the right to freely dispose of the fruits of their labor, to sell them, this contributed to the increase in the material interest of the peasants in the production of agricultural products; - transfer of small and medium enterprises to private owners; - the revival of trade and commodity-money relations, permission for private trade; - elimination of free services; - leasing, concession of a part of small and medium-sized enterprises; - introduction of a system of free employment of labor force, material incentives for employees; - introduction of a stable currency - chervonets; - decentralization of the management system; - development of entrepreneurship; - development of credit, production, marketing cooperation. The rejection of the policy of "war communism", the denationalization of some commercial and industrial enterprises, the permission to create new ones stimulated the economic activity of the population, contributed to the elimination of the commodity shortage, the restoration of industry and transport. With the transition to the New Economic Policy, the control system nationalized industry through its decentralization. Instead of the liquidated central offices, they created self-supporting trusts: Donugol, Yugostal, Mashinotrest, Sakharotrest, etc. In total, 19 of them appeared in Ukraine. entrepreneurship. The so-called Nepmen- tenants, brokers, commission agents, wholesalers, industrialists, etc. The private sector competed with the state not only in trade but also in industry. Nepmen contributed to the country's withdrawal from the crisis and economic ruin. The most significant sign of the NEP in agriculture was the massive cooperative building. Cooperation in agriculture was carried out gradually. In the autumn of 1921, agricultural cooperatives separated from the unified system of consumer cooperatives. Then branch types of agricultural cooperation gradually spread. In March 1922, the All-Ukrainian Union of Agricultural Cooperation was created - "The Farmer", which already in 1923 united 2.5 thousand societies and 65 regional unions. By the end of the 20s. in various forms of cooperation were united more than half of the farms. Handicraft-industrial cooperation began to develop rapidly, uniting small handicraftsmen and urban artisans. A general indicator of the development of agriculture on the rails of the NEP was the rise in grain production. NEP reached its heyday in 1926: at this time, wages in industry increased 1.6 times (compared to 1924), wages for teachers were increased 3.6 times, mass construction and major repairs of housing developed, 14-day leave became mandatory for workers in cities, income peasants by a third exceeded the pre-war. During 1922-1924. The chervonets, which was equal to 10 tsarist rubles, replaced Soviet banknotes and was exchanged for 6 US dollars. 2. Features of the NEP in Ukraine. Such a sharp turn in politics took place painful enough even in the party environment under the pressure of the realities of economic life. But on March 27, 1921, an extraordinary session of the All-Ukrainian Central Executive Committee decided to replace the surplus appropriation with a food tax, and already on March 29, the government of the Ukrainian SSR issued a decree on the norms and amount of the tax, which was much less than the surplus appraisal. But NEP was introduced in Ukraine later, than in Russia. In 1921, the situation in Ukraine did not change much. In some provinces, the size of the tax in kind was equal to the gross grain harvest, that is, everything grown was subject to seizure. This was due to the desire of the Soviet leadership to "pump out" from the Ukrainian village as many resources as possible using purely forceful methods, proven during the war years, to use the republic's food resources for as long as possible without any restrictions. The interests of the Ukrainian peasantry were ignored. This is what main feature transition to NEP in Ukraine. Besides, features NEP in Ukraine were also: higher taxes than in other Soviet republics; the introduction of the NEP was accompanied by a struggle against the peasant insurrectionary movement. In reality, the NEP began in Ukraine only at the beginning of 1922 The famine that engulfed the regions of southern Ukraine in 1921-1922 further delayed the normalization of the situation in agriculture. Only on July 26, 1922 VUTsIK legislated private property right on the property of factory, trade and other enterprises. On the ground, there was a massive discontent NEP, because during the years of the civil war the ruling party and millions of citizens developed a strong habit of centralized-distributive methods of economy. Since the October Revolution took place under the slogan social equality, The property stratification under the New Economic Policy caused indignation among some, and disappointment among others. 3. Cancellation of the NEP. 3.1. The inconsistency of the new economic policy. Under the conditions of the establishment of a totalitarian regime, the NEP was doomed: the new economic policy was based on two incompatible elements:- market relations in the economy, pluralism of forms of ownership and economic structure; - the Bolsheviks' monopoly on power, a rigid administrative-command system in the political organization of society. The goal of the Bolsheviks the introduction of the NEP was not providing economic freedom to citizens. They wanted to use the activity of the population to strengthen the economic foundation of their political regime and central government. The NEP provided for the intensification of foreign policy and foreign economic activity, the strengthening of contacts with the outside world, and the political course of the Bolshevik regime was to build socialism in one single country. The need for industrialization, the creation of a powerful military-industrial complex was postponed for indefinite term through the lack of investment in industry from domestic and foreign sources. 3.2. Crises of the NEP. Soon the contradictions that combined the NEP led to a series of crises. The first was price crisis. After the abolition of the brutal control of the state, food prices rose sharply and rose rapidly in comparison with the prices of industrial products. In the summer of 1922, the country was engulfed unemployment. At some enterprises, wages continued to be paid out in food rations, but in terms of market prices. Sometimes the payment was not issued due to the fact that the enterprise could not find cash. 3.3. The attack on the NEP by state bodies. At the XV Congress of the CPSU (b) (December 1927), the leadership of the Communist Party set the task total displacement in the country's private sector economy. For this purpose, taxes from private and rental enterprises, transport tariffs, prices for raw materials, materials, equipment, which private traders bought from state enterprises and organizations, increased. Methods of attack on private enterprises were different. One of them is the breaking of contracts for the lease of state-owned enterprises under any pretext. The process of nationalization of industries revived and rebuilt by private owners began under the pretext of full payment of all taxes and fines. 1930 was the last year in the legal activity of private enterprises. As a result, already in 1930 it was sold significantly less manufactured goods than in previous years. There was a shortage (shortage) of consumer goods, which immediately caused discontent among the general population. The liquidation of private enterprise has led to an increase in the number of unemployed in the country. To justify the deteriorating economic situation, the Soviet leadership began an active search for internal and external "enemies" who were accused of wrecking the national economy. Ultimately, this meant refusal from market relations and transition to directive methods of management.
    Ukraine and the formation of the USSR

    On November 13-16, 1920, the exodus of the Russian army of General Wrangel and the civilian population sympathizing with her from the Crimea outside Russia took place. This event is called the time of the end of the Civil War in the South of Russia. Many thousands of military and civilian refugees were forced to leave Russia and flee into the unknown.

    The evacuation was associated with the success of the Red Army in the offensive operation of the troops of the Southern Front under the command of M.V. Frunze in order to break through the White fortifications on the Perekop Isthmus and Sivash, and occupy the Crimean Peninsula (Perekop-Chongar operation November 7 - November 17, 1920). Three roads led to the peninsula. The Perekop isthmus is about 10 km wide. To the east, beyond the Sivash, where the Chongar Peninsula is close to the Crimea, a narrow dam with a railway line and a bridge was laid from it, and in another place a horse-drawn bridge was located. The third road was located even further east - across the Genichesk bridge to the Arabat Spit. Back in the spring of 1920, the Whites decided to further strengthen them, but in reality they did little. Due to the lack of funds, materials, and lack of perseverance, the work went slowly.

    At Perekop, the first line of defense was the Turkish Wall - earthen, poured back in the Middle Ages. Behind it, 20-25 km, there were several lines of Ishun fortifications between lakes and bays. All positions were ordinary trenches, often half-collapsed due to autumn rains. They were covered by barbed wire entanglements. The dugouts were made of wood and earth, the artillery had only field fortifications, and not long-term ones. Actually, there were almost no heavy artillery, it was lost during the retreat, while foreigners were in no hurry with supplies. The railway line to the Ishun fortifications for the transport of ammunition was not completed. The Turkish Wall was defended by the Drozdov division, which numbered only 3.2 thousand bayonets. On the ledge of the Lithuanian peninsula stood 2,000 soldiers. Fostikov's brigade. Kornilovites and Markovites occupied Ishun positions, they covered the southern part of Sivash. In the Chongar direction and the Arabat Spit, the defense was occupied by the Don Corps and the Kuban (about 3 thousand people). The 13th and 34th divisions and the cavalry corps were in reserve. All parts were heavily bled from previous battles. In the rear, the 15th division was additionally formed. In total, the defense was held by about 35 thousand bayonets and sabers with about 200 guns, 750 machine guns, 14 armored trains, 45 tanks and armored vehicles. Several thousand more were busy guarding communications, facilities and fighting partisans.

    The Soviet command concentrated a very powerful grouping for this decisive operation. The southern front consisted of about 190 thousand bayonets and sabers with 985 guns, 4435 machine guns, 17 armored trains and 57 armored vehicles. In addition, the “father” Makhno transferred 5.5 thousand corps under the command of Karetnikov to Frunze. Initially, Frunze planned to deliver the main blow to the 4th Army and the 1st Cavalry Army through the Arabat Spit. However, from the side of the Sea of ​​Azov, this direction was protected by the fire of the white ships, and the red flotilla remained in Taganrog due to early freezing. The main direction of the strike had to be moved to Perekop. The breakthrough was to be carried out by the 6th Army, with a double blow - on the forehead and landing through the Sivash to the Lithuanian Peninsula. In the Chongar direction, they planned to deliver an auxiliary strike.

    On November 7, the Red Army carried out reconnaissance in battle in the Chongar direction. The Crimean peninsula was declared under a state of siege, General Kutepov was appointed head of defense. On the night of November 8, the main operation began. The Blucher group began to storm the Turkish Wall: four brigades of the 51st division, the Latvian division, an artillery group of 55 guns and an armored group - 14 armored vehicles. Through the Sivash, 20 thousand troops were thrown as part of two brigades of the 51st division, the 15th and 52nd divisions. During a fierce battle, the Reds occupied the positions of the Whites, but they could not advance further than the Lithuanian Peninsula, they were stopped by artillery fire and counterattacks by the arrived White reinforcements. The 7th Cavalry Division and the Makhnovists were transferred to the aid of the Red Landing Forces, this led to a radical change in this direction. Then Frunze sent the 16th Cavalry Division to this direction. The Whites, under strong pressure, began to retreat, and the Reds broke into the Crimea.

    On the Turkish Wall, the situation for the Red Army was more difficult. The Whites fought back furiously and repelled three assaults. Only during the fourth night assault were the Reds able to break through the positions of the Whites. The Drozdovites and Kornilovites were already cut off from their own, but they were able to clear the way. By the evening of November 9, the Reds entered the Ishun positions, and the 51st Division broke through them on the move. White's breakthrough was stopped. But the whites pulled up artillery and opened heavy fire. On November 10, the offensive was continued, and the 51st division captured the second line of defense. Wrangel tried to organize a counterattack, pulling up Barbovich's corps and starting to transfer the Don Corps from the Chongar direction.

    The Red Command, having learned about this movement of white troops with the help of aviation reconnaissance, gave the order to strike at the Chongar direction of the 4th Army, and the 2nd Cavalry Army was sent to Perekop. On the night of November 11, the offensive began in the Chongar direction. This blow could lead to the exit of the Reds to the rear of the entire Ishun grouping of the Whites. Wrangel turned back the Don Corps and sent all serviceable armored trains to the Tanagash station.

    On November 11, the decisive battle took place. The Latvian division, which replaced the 51st, broke through the third, last line of the Ishun positions on the western flank. Barbovich's corps counterattacked on the eastern flank. The White Cavalry overturned the 7th and 16th Cavalry Divisions, hitting the 15th and 52nd Infantry Divisions. However, this offensive was stopped by the forces of the 2nd Cavalry Army and the Makhnovists. The commander of the 2nd Cavalry, Philip Mironov, used a military trick, over two hundred "carts" with machine guns were located behind the first line. After a collision with the Whites, the Reds opened up and swept away the advanced units of the enemy with machine-gun fire. Whites mixed up and began to retreat. By the end of the day, the Red Army captured the last line of the Ishun fortifications. After a fierce battle, the red troops made their way under Chongar. At 3 am on November 12, the Reds broke into Tanagash. Red troops began to enter the Crimea in two streams.

    Crimean evacuation

    The civilian population of the Crimean peninsula remained in a state of blissful ignorance until the last day. The White command, in order not to provoke panic and not cause the activation of the Bolshevik underground, after the failure of the October offensive, informed the population that the retreat was carried out in an organized manner and with minor losses. It was reported that the Red Army would try to break through to the peninsula in the coming days, but would receive a due rebuff. Crimea was declared a "besieged fortress" that would hold out until a turning point occurred in the general situation. In the newspapers, the topic was developed, "creatively" supplemented. It was reported that behind the "Perekop strongholds" the population of Crimea can "calmly look at their future." There were even statements that the size of the Russian army of Wrangel is excessive to protect the "strongholds" of Perekop. So, on November 7, General Slashchev stated that "our army is so large that one-fifth of its composition would be enough to defend the Crimea ...".

    As a result, the peninsula lived quietly until the last moment. Cinemas worked, plays were staged, a non-party public meeting headed by Prince Dolgoruky adopted an appeal to the Entente, where Crimea was called "the key to salvation from Bolshevism". Only the most far-sighted looked for ways of salvation and bought up the currency. For most people, the defeat of November 8-11 was like a bolt from the blue. People knew that a fierce battle was inevitable, but they believed that the offensive of the Red Army would break against the defensive lines of Perekop.

    Even the command of the White Army, which had much more complete information about the situation, did not expect such an outcome. Wrangel believed that Frunze had about 100 thousand people under command, of which 25 thousand were cavalry, in reality the Southern Front had almost 200 thousand people, of which more than 40 thousand were cavalry. A large superiority of the Reds was created in artillery and machine guns. They considered the possibility of defeat, but did not believe that everything would happen so quickly. It was believed that there would be enough time to prepare for a possible evacuation.

    On November 10, after a meeting between Wrangel and Kutepov, it was decided to begin the evacuation of the rear. To solve this problem, all commercial ships in ports were requisitioned, regardless of nationality. They began to load infirmaries, some central institutions. Through the French representative of the Comte de Martel, the Wrangel government turned to France asking for asylum. Teams were formed from staff members to prevent unrest, which could be caused by a message about the fall of the defense line. Soon, even without a general announcement, they began to issue documents for evacuation to the civilian population.

    On the night of November 11-12, when the last lines of defense collapsed, the evacuation plan was already prepared. Ships and vessels were distributed between units, transports were allocated for the families of military, government and logistics institutions and organizations. The remaining ships were to be used for the export of those wishing among the civilian population. To speed up loading and make it without delay, each part had its own port for loading. The 1st and 2nd corps were to withdraw to Sevastopol and Yevpatoriya, the Barbovich corps to Yalta, the Kuban to Feodosia, the Don to Kerch. The troops retreated in a rather organized manner, they even managed to break away from the Reds by 1-2 transitions. It should be noted that the development of the evacuation plan began six months before the evacuation, it was developed by the headquarters of the commander-in-chief together with the commander of the fleet. To implement this plan, a certain tonnage of ships had to remain permanently in the Black Sea basin. All ships and watercraft were assigned to ports. In the same ports, an emergency supply of coal, engine oil and provisions was created in case an evacuation was announced.

    The Red Army was regrouping its forces. Frunze, apparently, expected the fierce resistance of the doomed white units, and offered them an honorable surrender, promising freedom, immunity, and even free travel abroad on parole to stop the fight against the Bolsheviks. On November 12, Frunze was criticized by Lenin for this proposal. Only a day later, the Red troops continued their offensive. The 6th army moved to Evpatoria, the 2nd and 1st Cavalry armies - to Simferopol and Sevastopol, the 4th army and the 3rd cavalry corps - to Feodosia and Kerch. On November 13, the Reds occupied Simferopol.

    The French government, after some deliberation, agreed to provide shelter to the Russian army of Wrangel and the refugees. However, as a "collateral" the French demanded all the ships. On November 12, Wrangel issued an order for a general evacuation. Everyone who wanted to stay in Russia was given complete freedom. Damage and destruction of property was prohibited. The South Russian government warned citizens about the difficulties of crossing in cramped conditions, and the uncertainty of the fate of those leaving, since none of the foreign states gave their consent to accept the evacuees.

    Slashchev offered to give the last battle in the Crimea, or land in the Caucasus, seize a bridgehead. However, Kutepov and Wrangel refused to support these adventures. People laden with various goods reached the ports. For most, this evacuation came as a surprise. In general, during the evacuation, unlike similar events in Odessa and Novorossiysk, order was maintained. Special teams had the authority to stop the riots by any means. A significant number of ships also helped to maintain order, the entire fleet left the Crimea, part of the watercraft was taken in tow. In addition, some people were loaded onto foreign ships - French, English, etc. To accommodate more people, they dumped ammunition and other property into the sea. Placed people on the aisles and decks. So, on the destroyer Grozny, with a regular crew of 75 people, 1015 people were taken out. On the steamer "Saratov", which was designed for 1860 people, 7056 were planted. The steamers left overloaded to the extreme. There was not enough food, water, living space. It is clear that individual cases of robberies and riots happened, but they did not take on a mass order. In particular, prisoners released from prison were engaged in robberies in Simferopol, wine cellars were looted in Alushta and Yalta, and warehouses of the American Red Cross were robbed in Sevastopol, etc.

    True, many decided to stay. Some did not want to leave their homeland, become an exile, wander around foreign lands. Others were affected by the surprise factor, perhaps with more time to think, they would have evacuated. Still others trusted the leaflets of Frunze, Brusilov about mercy to the rest. Others simply did not have time to escape, etc. On the whole, a fairly significant number of whites and "bourgeois" remained.

    On the evening of November 13, 1920, the last meeting of the government of the South of Russia took place, and on November 14, loading onto ships was completed. Wrangel switched to the cruiser General Kornilov. In fact, a whole “white city” was created on the water. Already on board, Wrangel made a proposal to the French government on the transfer of the Russian army to the "Western Front" to fight Bolshevism, "enemies of world civilization and culture." The Whites did not yet believe that such a front would not exist. Western governments did not want to confront Soviet Russia directly. If such a decision was impossible, Wrangel proposed to raise the issue of placing the fleet at the disposal of the White Army at the disposal of the international commission for the protection of the straits.

    The White fleet (more than 120 ships) with about 150 thousand exiles headed for Constantinople. On November 15, the cruiser General Kornilov landed Wrangel in Yalta, where the commander was convinced that the evacuation of military units had been completed. Then the cruiser visited Feodosia, where there was not enough tonnage of ships and part of the Kuban Cossacks went to Kerch. Wrangel also visited Kerch, where it turned out that the Don and Kuban had been safely taken out. On the morning of November 17, the cruiser passed along the coast for the last time and headed for the Bosphorus. The Russian army of Wrangel was completely evacuated, except for those who fell behind on the way, were cut off from the ports, or decided to stay. The passage by sea from the ports of the Crimean peninsula to Constantinople lasted from one to five days, for many people it became a real torment. In fact, it was a kind of prelude to those hardships and sorrows that will fall to the lot of the majority of Russian emigrants in a foreign land.

    On November 15, the Red Army occupied Sevastopol and Feodosia, on November 16 - Kerch, and on November 17 - Yalta. The Perekop-Chongar operation was successfully completed, the entire Crimean peninsula was occupied by the Red Army, and the Southern Front of the Civil War was liquidated.

    Crimea was ahead of a wave of "Red Terror", which was organized by the chairman of the Crimean Military Revolutionary Committee Bela Kun and the secretary of the Crimean Party Committee R. S. Zemlyachka (Zalkind). Crimea was blocked by troops. Bela Kun personally signed the passes to leave the peninsula. Terror fell on the officers, then on the family members of the White Guards, people of noble origin, employees of various institutions, "bourgeois". Entire round-ups were carried out, when entire neighborhoods were cordoned off and documents were checked for several days, some were released, others were destroyed. Thousands of people were killed. Then hunger was added to the terror, since it was almost impossible to leave the peninsula, many people in the Crimea were doomed to starvation. Refugees who had no sources of livelihood were particularly affected.

    95 years ago - in the autumn of 1920 - after the defeat of Wrangel's army in the Crimea, 150 thousand Russians went to a foreign land. Most of them are forever...

    Wake column of transports during the evacuation of the Wrangel army from the Crimea. 1920

    The Russian exodus took place, which put an end to the Civil War, opened a significant era of Russian emigration and finally completed the history of the Russian Empire. Thus ended the Civil War in Russia, at least in its open manifestation.

    The beginning of this war - "Russian unrest", according to the apt definition of General Anton Denikin - was the overthrow of Emperor Nicholas II in February 1917. And a little over three years later, former subjects of Russia, who did not want to become Soviet citizens, fled Crimea. They saved themselves by leaving everything in their homeland that until recently constituted the essence of their completely calm and successful, in any case, worthy life. Home, vocation, property, in the end - the graves of their ancestors ... They no longer had all this. Uncertainty and hope for salvation is, perhaps, all that they had at that time.

    Crimea Island

    Then, in 1920, the remnants of the volunteer armies, who retreated under the onslaught of the Reds, along with numerous civilian refugees, found their temporary refuge in the Crimea. They hoped for the Crimea as a miracle that could save them and give hope for the preservation of the former Russia here. But the miracle didn't happen...

    The ruler and commander-in-chief of the armed forces of the South of Russia from April 4, 1920 was Baron Pyotr Nikolaevich Wrangel. One of the most talented and at the same time modest people of his time, he was a practical and realist and was well aware of the situation in the Crimea: “It is not by a triumphal procession from the Crimea to Moscow that Russia can be liberated, but by creating at least on a piece of Russian land such an order and such living conditions, who would pull to themselves all the thoughts and forces of the people groaning under the red yoke.

    General Wrangel began the development of the peninsula. There was an obvious socio-economic problem: the population of Crimea had become prohibitively large, and it was necessary to feed everyone based on the available resources of the Crimean peninsula. According to the general, he had to “establish a completely disordered industrial apparatus, provide the population with food, using the natural wealth of the region in the widest possible way ...” An agrarian reform was undertaken, launched by Wrangel’s special order on land. Trade and entrepreneurship immediately intensified.

    In parallel with the solution of economic problems, Wrangel took up issues of public education - from the opening of schools (a school was even created with teaching in the Ukrainian language, at the request of refugees from Little Russia) to the mass production of newspapers, magazines and other publications (of various political persuasion, except for the Bolshevik, of course) . The Society "Russian Book Publishing in Crimea" published 150,000 copies of textbooks alone in six months.
    Of course, the "besieged fortress" regime dictated its own laws. But the fundamental feature characteristic of the policy of General Wrangel and the entire White Crimea was that the punishment of individuals did not spill over into terror. Those suspected of sympathizing with Bolshevism were arrested and ... sent to the Reds!

    Censorship also worked, which had the right to remove any publication from the press on suspicion of revolutionary propaganda. By the way, several times this censorship refused to publish the materials ... of Pyotr Wrangel himself, considering them "too revolutionary." And the general took it for granted: "The law is the same for all."
    And all this Soviet historiography will later call "Wrangel's lawlessness", "the last tyranny of the whites" ...

    One to two

    A certain weak confidence in the prospect of the existence of Crimea as a separate state was given by its diplomatic recognition by the French Republic. In addition, Wrangel hoped that while the Soviet government was waging war with the Polish imperialist Jozef Pilsudski, The Russian army and the entire Crimea have a temporary reserve - at least until the onset of spring.

    UNLIKE THE NAMES OF THE LEADERS OF THE REVOLUTION, the name of Baron Wrangel, an opponent of the Civil War, who saved thousands of people from reprisal, is still not on the map of Russia

    And on October 12, unexpectedly for everyone, Poland, led by Pilsudski, signed an armistice agreement with the government of Vladimir Lenin, which allowed the Bolsheviks to throw "all their forces on the Black Baron"! On November 3, 1920, the Red Army came close to Perekop.

    The ratio of forces of the Russian army and the Southern Front was as follows: 75,815 bayonets and sabers at the disposal of Wrangel against 188,771 at Frunze; 1404 machine guns and 271 guns against 3000 machine guns and 623 guns respectively. As for the Perekop fortifications, portrayed by Soviet cinema as completely impregnable, they were all unfinished, and they were defended by soldiers and officers who, unlike the Red Army, did not have warm clothes (in early November, the Crimea was 15-degree frosts).

    Realizing the seriousness of the situation of the army and the population of Crimea and not having excessive hopes regarding the impregnability of the fortifications of Perekop, General Wrangel ordered in advance to provide opportunities for the evacuation of 75 thousand people (as it turned out later, this preparation made it possible to take twice as many people out of the Crimea).

    Soviet historiography will then present the advance of the Reds deep into the Crimea as a thoughtful and natural event, and the evacuation of the Russian army of General Wrangel as a series of panic and desperate actions. In fact, however, in order to somehow justify the mediocrity of the assault, which cost the Southern Front too dearly, later it was necessary to compose a legend about the Wrangel army equipped and armed to the teeth by the allies, hiding behind a "complex layered system of long-term defense."

    Evacuation of the Russian army of Wrangel. Kerch, 1920

    As well as had to hide the true goal of the Frunze operation to capture the Crimea, thwarted by General Wrangel. In fact, the Red Army was tasked not only to penetrate into the Crimea, breaking Wrangel's resistance, but also to prevent the evacuation of the military and civilian population of the peninsula (for which we now know very well). “In the future, both cavalry armies should keep in mind the most energetic pursuit of the enemy, in no case allowing him to board ships,” Frunze ordered. This, however, could not be done by the Reds, who, no matter how eager they were, could not use their numerical advantage. And one and a half hundred thousand Russians were thus saved from the terrible fate that did not escape the rest.

    "Surprised by the exorbitant compliance"

    Realizing that the rapid defeat of the units of the Russian army was thwarted (the Wrangel troops retreated in a surprisingly organized manner - without contact with the enemy), on November 11, the Soviet army commander sent a “pacifying” radiogram to the commander-in-chief Pyotr Wrangel with the following content:

    “In view of the obvious futility of further resistance by your troops, which threatens only with the shedding of unnecessary blood flows, I suggest that you stop resisting and surrender with all the troops of the army and navy, military supplies, equipment, weapons and all kinds of military equipment.

    If you accept the above proposal, the Revolutionary Military Council of the armies of the Southern Front, on the basis of the powers granted to it by the central Soviet government, guarantees those who surrender, including persons of the highest command personnel, full forgiveness in respect of all offenses related to the civil strife. All those who do not want to stay and work in socialist Russia will be given the opportunity to travel abroad without hindrance, provided that they renounce on their word of honor from further struggle against workers' and peasants' Russia and Soviet power.

    I expect an answer before 24:00 on November 11. Moral responsibility for all possible consequences in case of rejection of an honest offer will fall on you.

    Commander of the Southern Front Mikhail Frunze».

    Instead of answering, Wrangel ordered all radio stations to be turned off.

    Commander of the Southern Front Mikhail Frunze and commander of the Southwestern Front Alexander Yegorov at the military parade after the capture of Perekop. November 1920

    Which, by the way, was redundant, since the very next day, November 12, the chairman of the Council of People's Commissars, Vladimir Lenin, hastened to warn the leadership of the Southern Front against the very possibility of humane treatment of compatriots who had surrendered: “I just learned about your proposal to Wrangel to surrender. Extremely surprised by the exorbitant pliability of the conditions. If the enemy accepts them, then it is necessary to really ensure the capture of the fleet and the non-release of a single ship; if the enemy does not accept these conditions, then, in my opinion, they can no longer be repeated and must be dealt with mercilessly.

    On November 11 (October 29, old style), General Wrangel gave his last order for the army and the Crimea.

    « ORDER

    Ruler of the South of Russia and Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Army
    Sevastopol, October 29, 1920

    Russian people!

    Left alone in the fight against the rapists, the Russian army is fighting an unequal battle, defending the last piece of Russian land where law and truth exist.
    In the consciousness of the responsibility that lies on me, I am obliged to foresee all accidents in advance.

    By my order, the evacuation and boarding of ships in the ports of Crimea has already begun for all those who shared the path of the Cross with the Army, the families of military personnel, civil servants with their families and individuals who could be in danger if the enemy came.

    The army will cover the landing, bearing in mind that the ships necessary for its evacuation are in full readiness in ports according to the established schedule. To fulfill the duty to the army and the population, everything has been done within the limits of human strength.

    Our future paths are full of uncertainty. We have no other land except Crimea. There is no state treasury. Frankly, as always, I warn everyone of what awaits them.

    May the Lord send strength and wisdom to all to overcome and survive the Russian hard times.

    General Wrangel».

    On November 13, the Reds occupied Simferopol. The commander of the 2nd Cavalry Army, Philip Kuzmich Mironov, recalled: “On November 13, the Crimean peninsula in the greatest silence received the Red troops sent to occupy the cities: Evpatoria, Sevastopol, Feodosia, Kerch.”

    "We are going to a foreign land"

    With a huge number of people willing, with an unrealistically short allotted time (several days), the evacuation proceeded calmly, without panic (contrary to the idea that develops in some Soviet films). “Splendidly carried out” was called by an eyewitness - the French representative to the Crimean government.

    On November 14, 1920, General Wrangel left Sevastopol. He left, as befits the commander-in-chief. He traveled around on his boat the ships ready to sail in the bay of Sevastopol and addressed everyone with a short farewell: “We are going to a foreign land, we are not going like beggars with outstretched hands, but with our heads held high, in the consciousness of a duty fulfilled to the end.” Then, making sure that everyone who wished boarded the ships, he made a raid on the cruiser General Kornilov to Yalta, Feodosia and Kerch in order to personally oversee the loading. And only after that he left.

    Later, all the ships of the Black Sea Fleet, with the exception of one, arrived in Constantinople.

    What awaited the rest? It would be more correct to ask this: what fate befell those who did not save themselves?

    Already on the night of November 14, the Red Army occupied all the coastal cities of Crimea. An eyewitness of those events wrote: “Having entered the city, the soldiers attacked the inhabitants, undressed them and right there, on the street, put on the taken away clothes, throwing their tattered soldiers to the unfortunate undressed. Whoever could from the inhabitants hid in basements and secluded places, afraid to catch the eye of the brutalized Red Army soldiers.

    The city at that time had a sad look. Everywhere there were corpses of horses, half-eaten by dogs, heaps of garbage ... The windows in the shops were broken, the sidewalks near them were strewn with glass, dirt was everywhere you looked.

    The next day, the robbery of liquor stores and the wholesale drunkenness of the Reds began. There was not enough bottled wine, so they began to uncork barrels and drink directly from them. Being already drunk, the soldiers could not use the pump and therefore simply broke the barrels. Wine poured everywhere, flooded the cellars and poured into the streets. The drunkenness continued for a whole week, and with it all kinds of, often the most incredible, violence against the inhabitants.

    Soon the whole of Crimea got acquainted with the practical application of the slogan of the Dzhankoy organization of the RCP (b): "Let's nail the coffin of the bourgeoisie already dying, writhing in convulsions!" On November 17, the Krymrevkom, whose chairman was appointed a Hungarian revolutionary Bela Kun, issued order No. 4, which designated groups of persons who were obliged to appear for registration within three days. These are foreign subjects; persons who arrived on the territory of Crimea after the departure of Soviet power in June 1919; as well as all officers, wartime officials, soldiers and former employees of institutions of the volunteer army.

    Later, this experience of "voluntary registration" will be successfully applied by the Nazis in relation to the Jews in the occupied territories ...

    Honestly

    The naivety with which those under orders went to register, the same naivety based on decency of people who surrendered voluntarily and counted on the word of honor of the Frunze Commander, cost them too much. As is known, they were either shot after being tortured to inflict as much torment as possible on the victim, or, without the use of torture, they were sunk alive in the holds of old barges.

    Bolshevik leaders Bela Kun and Rozalia Zalkind (Zemlyachka) were at the head of the reprisals against the former. As for the lover of making promises, the red commander Frunze, he was not only aware of what was happening, but also encouraged certain leaders of terror like Efim Evdokimova: “I consider the activities of Comrade. Evdokimov deserving of encouragement. Due to the special nature of this activity, it is not very convenient to carry out the awards in the usual way.

    TODAY, 95 YEARS AFTER THE TRAGIC AND BLOODY EVENTS, we have the right to ask ourselves: have we fully learned the historical lesson of revolutions?

    Thus, all those evacuated by Wrangel found salvation: hardships and hardships awaited them, but still it was the salvation of life. Without exaggeration, we can say that Pyotr Nikolaevich Wrangel gave them a second birth.

    Today, 95 years after those tragic and bloody events, we have the right to ask ourselves: have we fully learned the historical lesson of revolutions? Do we understand that a revolution always leads to a fratricidal civil war - a war in which there are no and cannot be winners, since the people fight with themselves? How do you know if you have...

    Reds storm Perekop. 1920

    Ashes of a sinking barge with living officers Rosalia Salkind rests in the Kremlin wall. A street in Simferopol and a square in Moscow were named after another organizer of the massacres in the Crimea, Bela Kun, and the Military Academy received the name of Frunze. But in honor of Wrangel, the opponent of the Civil War, who saved thousands of people from reprisal, neither streets nor educational institutions are named.

    It is time to think about our historical memory, especially on the eve of the centenary of the revolution, because 2017 is just around the corner.

    Petr Alexandrov-Derkachenko, State Secretary of the Russian Historical Society Abroad

    Russian revolution