The “Makaryev school” of painting, the “school of Grozny” are concepts that cover a little more than three decades in the life of Russian art of the second half (or, more precisely, the third quarter) of the 16th century. These years are full of facts, rich in works of art, characterized by a new attitude to the tasks of art, its role in the general structure of the young centralized state, and, finally, they are notable for their attitude towards the creative personality of the artist and attempts to regulate his activities, more than ever to subordinate them to the tasks polemical, to involve in participation in the intense dramatic action of state life. For the first time in the history of Russian artistic culture, issues of art became the subject of debate at two church councils (1551 and 1554). For the first time, a pre-developed plan for the creation of numerous works of different types of art (monumental and easel painting, book illustration and applied art, in particular wood carving) predetermined themes, plots, emotional interpretation and, to a large extent, served as the basis for a complex set of images designed to reinforce, to justify and glorify the rule and deeds of the first “crowned autocrat” who ascended the throne of the centralized Russian state. And it was at this time that a grandiose artistic project was being carried out: the front chronicle of Ivan the Terrible, the Tsar-Book - a chronicle of events in world and especially Russian history, written, probably in 1568-1576, especially for the royal library in a single copy. The word “facial” in the title of the Code means illustrated, with images “in faces”. Consists of 10 volumes containing about 10 thousand sheets of rag paper, decorated with more than 16 thousand miniatures. Covers the period “from the creation of the world” to 1567. A grandiose “paper” project of Ivan the Terrible!

Face chronograph. RNB.

The chronological framework of these phenomena in the artistic life of the Russian centralized state in the second half of the 16th century. determined by one of the most significant events of that time - the crowning of Ivan IV. The wedding of Ivan IV (January 16, 1547) opened a new period of establishment of autocratic power, being a kind of result of a long process of formation of a centralized state and the struggle for the unity of Rus', subordinate to the power of the Moscow autocrat. That is why the very act of crowning Ivan IV, which served as the subject of repeated discussions among the future participants of the “elected council”, as well as among the inner circle of Metropolitan Macarius, was, as historians have already said more than once, furnished with exceptional pomp. Based on literary sources from the end of the previous century, Macarius developed the very ritual of the royal wedding, introducing the necessary symbolism into it. A convinced ideologist of autocratic power, Macarius did everything possible to emphasize the exclusivity (“God’s chosenness”) of the power of the Moscow autocrat, the original rights of the Moscow sovereign, with references to historical analogies in the field of civil history and, above all, the history of Byzantium, Kievan and Vladimir-Suzdal Rus'.

Royal book.

The ideology of autocracy should, according to Macarius’s plan, be reflected in the written sources of the era and, first of all, the chronicle, books of the royal genealogy, the circle of annual reading, which were the Chetya Menaion compiled under his leadership, and also, apparently, it was intended to turn to the creation of appropriate works of fine art. That the plans for addressing all types of artistic culture were grandiose from the very beginning is shown by the scope of literary works of that time. It is difficult, however, to imagine what forms the implementation of these plans in the field of fine art would have taken and in what time frame they would have been realized, if not for the fire in June 1547, which devastated the vast territory of the city. As the chronicle says, on Tuesday, June 21, “at 10 o’clock on the third week of Peter’s Lent, the Church of the Exaltation of the Honorable Cross behind Neglimnaya on Arbatskaya Street caught fire... And a great storm came, and fire began to flow, like lightning, and the fire was intense... And the storm turned into a larger hail, and the cathedral church of the Most Pure Top caught fire in the city, and in the royal courtyard of the Grand Duke on the roof sheets, and the wooden huts, and the sheets decorated with gold, and the Treasury courtyard and with the royal treasury, and the church in the royal courtyard royal treasuries The Annunciation is golden-topped, Andreev's Deesis of Rublev's letters, overlaid with gold, and images decorated with gold and beads of valuable Greek letters of his ancestors collected from many years... And in many stone churches, Deesis and images, and church vessels, and many human bellies were burnt out , and the Metropolitan's courtyard." “...And in the city all the courtyards and roofs are burning, and the Chudovsky monastery is all burning, the only relics of the great holy miracle worker Alexei were quickly preserved by the mercy of God... And the Ascension Monastery is also all burning, ...and the Church of the Ascension is burning, images and vessels Church and human lives are many, only the archpriest brought out one image of the Most Pure One. And all the courtyards in the city were burnt, and in the city the roof of the city, and the cannon potion, wherever in the city, and those places where the city walls were torn apart... In one hour, a lot of people burned, 1,700 men and women and babies, a lot of people burned people along Tferskaya Street, and along Dmitrovka, and on Bolshoy Posad, along Ilyinskaya Street, in Gardens.” The fire on June 21, 1547, which began in the first half of the day, continued until night: “And in the third hour of the night the fiery flame ceased.” As is clear from the above chronicle evidence, buildings in the royal court were severely damaged, numerous works of art were destroyed and partly damaged.

Battle on the Ice. Chronicle miniature from the Front Vault of the 16th century.

But Moscow residents suffered even more. On the second day, the tsar and the boyars gathered at the bedside of Metropolitan Macarius, who was injured in the fire, “to think” - the state of mind of the masses was discussed, and the tsar’s confessor, Fyodor Barmin, reported on the spread of rumors about the cause of the fire, which black people explained by the witchcraft of Anna Glinskaya. Ivan IV was forced to order an investigation. In addition to F. Barmin, Prince Fyodor Skopin Shuisky, Prince Yuri Temkin, I. P. Fedorov, G. Yu. Zakharyin, F. Nagoy and “many others” took part in it. Alarmed by the fire, the Moscow black people, as the course of further events explains in the Continuation of the Chronograph of 1512 and the Chronicler Nikolsky, gathered at a meeting and on Sunday morning, June 26, entered the Kremlin’s Cathedral Square “to the sovereign’s court,” seeking trial of the perpetrators of the fire (the perpetrators of the fire , as stated above, the Glinskys were revered). Yuri Glinsky tried to hide in the Dmitrovsky chapel of the Assumption Cathedral. The rebels entered the cathedral, despite the ongoing divine service, and during the “Cherubim song” they extracted Yuri and killed him in front of the metropolitan seat, dragged him outside the city and threw him at the place of execution of the criminals. The Glinsky people were “beaten countless times and their stomachs were razed by the princess.” One might have thought that the murder of Yuri Glinsky was an “execution” dressed in a “traditional” and “legal” form.

Mityai (Mikhail) and St. Dionysius before the leader. book Dimitry Donskoy.

Miniature from the Facial Chronicle. 70s XVI century

This is evidenced by the fact that Glinsky’s body was taken out for auction and thrown “before the stake, where they would be executed.” The black people's protest did not end there. On June 29, armed and in battle formation, they (at the “cry of the executioner” or “birich”) moved to the royal residence in Vorobyovo. Their ranks were so formidable (they were with shields and spears) that Ivan IV was “surprised and horrified.” Black people demanded the extradition of Anna Glinskaya and her son Mikhail. The scale of the action of black people turned out to be quite large; the readiness for military action testified to the strength of the people's anger. This uprising was preceded by protests of the dissatisfied in the cities (in the summer of 1546, the Novgorod pishchalniks spoke out, and on June 3, 1547, the Pskovites, complaining about the royal governor Turuntai), and it is clear that the size of the popular unrest should have made a formidable impression not only on Ivan IV. The inner circle of the young tsar, who determined the policy of the 30s - 50s, had to take them into account. The organized uprising of the Moscow lower classes was mainly directed against boyar autocracy and arbitrariness, which was especially painfully reflected in the destinies of the broad masses during the youth of Ivan IV, and had a certain impact on the further development of domestic politics.

One of the books of the Front Vault of the 16th century.

Most likely, those historians who consider the Moscow uprising after the fire of 1547 to be inspired by opponents of boyar autocracy are right. It is not unreasonable to try to find the inspirers of the uprising in the inner circle of Ivan IV. However, inspired from the outside, it, reflecting the protest of the broad masses against boyar oppression, as we know, took on an unexpected scope, although it coincided in its direction with the new trends of the emerging government of the 50s. But at the same time, its scale, speed and strength of the popular reaction to the events were such that it was impossible not to take into account the significance of the speech and those deep social reasons that, regardless of the influence of the ruling political parties, gave rise to popular unrest. All this aggravated the complexity of the political situation and greatly contributed to the breadth of ideas and searches for the most effective means of ideological influence, among which works of fine art that were new in their content occupied a significant place. One might think that when developing a plan for political and ideological measures to influence broad public circles, it was decided to turn to one of the most accessible and familiar educational means - to formal and monumental painting, due to the capacity of its images, capable of leading from the usual edifying themes to more broad historical generalizations. A certain experience of this kind developed already during the reign of first Ivan III, and later Vasily III. In addition to influencing the Moscow black people, as well as the boyars and service people, the works of painting were intended to have a direct educational effect on the young Tsar himself. Like many literary endeavors carried out in the circle of Metropolitan Macarius and the “chosen council” - and the leading role of Macarius as the ideologist of autocratic power should not be underestimated - the works of painting in their essential part contained not only “justifications of the policy” of the tsar, but also revealed those basic ideas that were supposed to inspire Ivan IV himself and determine the general direction of his activities.

Ivan the Terrible at the wedding of Simeon Bekbulatovich.

It was important to interest Ivan IV in the general plan of restoration work to such an extent that their ideological orientation would, as if predetermined by the sovereign himself, come from him (remember that somewhat later the Stoglavy Cathedral was organized in a similar way). The initiative for restoration work was divided between Metropolitan Macarius, Sylvester and Ivan IV, who, naturally, had to officially lead. All these relationships can be traced in the very course of events, as the chronicle sets them out, and most importantly, as evidenced by the materials of the “Viskovaty case”. The interior of the temples burned out, and the fire did not spare the royal home or the royal treasury. Leaving churches without shrines was not the custom of Muscovite Rus'. Ivan IV, first of all, “sent holy and honorable icons to the cities, to Veliky Novgorod, and to Smolensk, and to Dmitrov, and Zvenigorod, and from many other cities, they brought many wonderful holy icons and at the Annunciation they set them up for veneration for the Tsar and all the peasants " Following this, restoration work began. One of the active participants in the organization of restoration work was Priest Sylvester, who himself served in the Annunciation Cathedral - as is known, one of the most influential figures of the “elected council”. Sylvester tells in detail about the progress of the work in his “Complaint” to the “consecrated cathedral” of 1554, from where one can glean information about the organization and performers of the work, and about the sources of iconography, and about the process of ordering and “acceptance” of works, as well as about the role and relationships Metropolitan Macarius, Ivan IV and Sylvester himself during the creation of new monuments of painting.

Shchelkanovschina. Popular uprising against the Tatars in Tver. 1327.

Miniature from the Front Chronicle of the 16th century

“The Complaint” allows one to judge the number of invited masters, as well as the very fact of inviting masters, and most importantly, about those artistic centers from which cadres of painters were drawn: “the sovereign sent icon painters to Novgorod, and to Pskov and to other cities, icon painters came together , and the Tsar Sovereign ordered them to paint icons, whoever was ordered to do what, and ordered others to sign the plates and to paint images at the city over the gates of the saints.” Thus, the areas of activity of painters are immediately determined: easel painting (icon painting), secular ward painting, creation of gate icons (it is possible to understand them as mural painting and as easel painting). Sylvester names two cities as the main artistic centers from which masters come: Novgorod and Pskov, and it is very interesting how the relationship between the masters and the organizers of the order develops. All from the same “Complaint” of Sylvester, as well as from his message to his son Anfim, one can judge the leading role of Sylvester in organizing the leadership of the squad itself, which carried out painting work after the fire of 1547. In particular, with the Novgorod masters, Sylvester apparently had relations Habitual, well-coordinated relationships have long been established. He himself determines what they should order, where they can get the sources of iconography: “And I, reporting to the sovereign Tsar, ordered the Novgorod icon painters to paint the Holy Trinity, the Life-Giving One in the acts, and I Believe in one God, and Praise the Lord from heaven, and Sophia, the Wisdom God, yes it is worthy to eat, and the translation of the Trinity had icons, why write, but on Simonov.” But this was done if the plots were traditional. The situation was much more complicated when these translations did not exist.

Defense of Kozelsk, 16th century miniature from the Nikon Chronicle.

The other part of the work was entrusted to the Pskov residents. Their invitation was not unexpected. They turned to Pskov craftsmen back at the end of the 15th century. True, at that time they invited skilled builders, whereas now they invited icon painters. Macarius, in the recent past the Archbishop of Novgorod and Pskov, himself, as is known, a painter, in all likelihood, at one time established relations with Pskov masters. In any case, based on the completed orders, one can judge the rather significant size of the workshop at the archbishop's court in Novgorod. The generally accepted opinion is that this entire workshop, following Macarius, moved to the metropolitan court in Moscow. Macarius, being already a metropolitan, could maintain relations with the Pskovites through the priest of the Annunciation Cathedral, Pskov Semyon, the same one who presented his “Complaint” to the “consecrated cathedral” together with Sylvester. Obviously, the best masters from different cities were convened to fulfill such a complex order, which laid the foundation for the “royal school” of painters. The Pskovites, without explaining the reason, did not want to work in Moscow and undertook to fulfill the order, working at home: “And the Pskov icon painters Ostan, yes Yakov, yes Mikhail, yes Yakushko, and Semyon Vysoky Glagol and his comrades, took time off to Pskov and were there to paint four large icons":

1. Last Judgment

2. Renewal of the Temple of Christ our God of the Resurrection

3. The Passion of the Lord in the Gospel parables

4. Icon, there are four feasts on it: “And God rested on the seventh day from all his works, that the only begotten Son is the Word of God, that people come, let us worship the three-part Divinity, that in the carnal grave”

So, at the head of the entire grandiose plan of restoration work was the king, “reporting” to whom or “asking” whom (partly nominally), Sylvester distributed orders among painters, especially if there was an immediate opportunity to use samples.

Battle on the Ice. The flight of the Swedes to the ships.

It should be especially emphasized that the Moscow sources of traditional iconography were the Trinity-Sergius Monastery and the Simonov Monastery. (In written sources, until the second half of the 16th century, there was no information about an art workshop in Simonovo, despite the mention of the names of several masters who came from this monastery). It should also be recalled that among the authoritative sources of iconography, Novgorod and Pskov churches are also mentioned, in particular the murals of St. Sophia of Novgorod, the Church of St. George in the Yuryev Monastery, St. Nicholas on the Yaroslav's Courtyard, the Annunciation on the Settlement, St. John on Opoki, the Cathedral of the Life-Giving Trinity in Pskov, which is very characteristic of Novgorod connections between Sylvester and Macarius. Despite the fact that it would seem natural to consider Metropolitan Macarius himself as the main inspirer of the paintings, it is clear from the text of the “Complaint” that he played a rather passive role in the organizational side of the order. But he carried out the “acceptance” of the order, “performing a prayer service with the entire consecrated cathedral,” because the most important act of approbation from the point of view of church ideology was the moment of consecration of completed works, primarily works of easel, as well as monumental painting. Ivan IV could not do without the participation at this stage either - he distributed new icons to churches. Restoration work after the fire of 1547 was considered a matter of national importance, since Ivan IV himself, Metropolitan Macarius and Sylvester, the member of the “elected council” closest to Ivan IV, took care of their implementation.

Ivan the Terrible and royal icon painters.

It was in the era of Grozny that art was “deeply exploited by the state and the church,” and a rethinking of the role of art took place, the importance of which as an educational principle, a means of persuasion and an irresistible emotional impact increases immeasurably, at the same time the usual way of artistic life changes dramatically. The possibility of “free creative development of the artist’s personality” is reduced. The artist loses the simplicity and freedom of relationship with the client-parishioner, the church ktitor or the abbot - the builder of the monastery. Now orders of national importance are strictly regulated by ruling circles, which consider art as a conductor of certain political trends. Themes and plots of individual works or entire ensembles are discussed by representatives of state and church authorities, become the subject of debate at councils, and are specified in legislative documents. During these years, plans were developed for grandiose monumental ensembles, cycles of easel works and illustrations in handwritten books, which generally have common trends.

Construction of St. Basil's Cathedral (Intercession on the Moat) on Red Square.

A desire is revealed to connect the history of the Moscow state with world history, to show the “chosenness” of the Moscow state, which is the subject of “divine economy.” This idea is supported by numerous analogies from Old Testament history, the history of the Babylonian and Persian kingdoms, the monarchy of Alexander the Great, Roman and Byzantine history. It is not without reason that the chronographic volumes of the Front Chronicle were created with special attention and such thoroughness in the circle of Makaryev scribes. It is not for nothing that in the monumental ensembles of temple paintings and paintings of the Golden Chamber such a significant place was given to historical and Old Testament subjects, selected on the principle of direct analogy. At the same time, the entire cycle of works of fine art was permeated with the idea of ​​​​the divinity of the sovereign power, its establishment by God, its originality in Rus' and the direct succession of royal dignity from the Roman and Byzantine emperors and the continuity of the dynasty of “God-appointed sceptre-holders” from the princes of Kyiv and Vladimir to the sovereign of Moscow. All this taken together was intended to reinforce and justify the very fact of the crowning of Ivan IV, to justify the further course of autocratic policy not only in the Moscow state itself, but also in the face of the “Orthodox East”.

Ivan the Terrible sends ambassadors to Lithuania.

This was all the more necessary because the “approval” of the wedding of Ivan IV by the Patriarch of Constantinople was expected, which, as we know, took place only in 1561, when a “conciliar charter” was received. An equally important place in the overall plan was occupied by the idea of ​​glorifying the military actions of Ivan IV. His military performances were interpreted as religious wars in defense of the purity and inviolability of the Christian state from infidels, liberating Christian captives and civilians from Tatar invaders and oppressors. Finally, the topic of religious and moral education seemed no less significant. It was interpreted on two levels: more in-depth with a certain philosophical and symbolic connotation in the interpretation of basic Christian dogma and more directly - in terms of moral purification and improvement. The last topic was also of a personal nature - it was about the spiritual education and self-correction of the young autocrat. All these trends, or, more precisely, all these facets of a single ideological concept, were realized in different ways in individual works of art throughout the entire Grozny reign. The culmination of the discovery and implementation of this concept was the period of restoration work of 1547-1554. and more broadly - the time of activity of the “elected Rada”.

Battle of Kulikovo. 1380

After 1570 until the end of the reign of Ivan IV, as is known, the volume of work in the field of fine arts sharply decreased, the tension of emotional content, the feeling of uniqueness and chosenness gradually faded. It is replaced by another, more severe, sorrowful, and sometimes tragic. Echoes of triumph and self-affirmation, so characteristic in the initial period, only occasionally make themselves felt in individual works as belated reflections of the past, only to fade away completely in the early 80s. At the end of the reign of Ivan the Terrible, applied art came to the forefront in artistic life. If it becomes impossible to affirm and glorify the idea of ​​autocracy as such, then it is natural to add splendor to palace everyday life; palace utensils, like royal clothes, covered with patterns and jewelry, often turn into unique works of art. The nature of the literary works undertaken in order to “prepare” for the wedding in the circle of Metropolitan Macarius is noteworthy. Among them, the rite of crowning the kingdom itself, with its direct connection with the “Tale of the Princes of Vladimir,” should be especially highlighted. The story about Vladimir Monomakh receiving the royal crown and his coronation “to the kingdom” is contained in the Degree Book and the Great Menaions of the Fourth, i.e., literary monuments of the Makaryev circle. The initial volumes of the chronographic part of the Litsevoy Chronicle Code, as well as an expanded (compared to other lists of the Nikon Chronicle) edition of the text of the first six sheets of the Golitsyn volume of the Litsey Chronicle Code, also contain a narrative about the beginning of the reign of Vladimir Monomakh in Kyiv and about his crowning “to the kingdom” with regalia , sent by the Byzantine emperor. In direct connection with them are miniatures decorating the chronographic part of the Front Vault, as well as miniatures of the first six sheets of the Golitsyn volume. In the miniatures of the chronographic part of the Litsa Chronicle, in turn, there is further disclosure of the theme of the divine establishment of autocratic power, the introduction of Rus' into the general course of world history, as well as the idea of ​​​​the chosenness of the Moscow autocracy. Thus, a certain circle of literary monuments is designated. These same themes are further explored in the paintings of the Golden Chamber, in the reliefs of the royal seat (“Monomakh’s throne”) erected in the Assumption Cathedral, and in the painting of the portal of the Archangel Cathedral. The icons executed by the Pskovites, seemingly purely dogmatic in their content, carry within themselves the beginning, and perhaps also the revelation, of the theme of the sacred nature of the wars led by Ivan IV, the divinely chosen feat of warriors awarded the crowns of immortality and glory, which culminates in the icon “ Church Militant" and in the depiction of Christ - the conqueror of death in the "Four Parts" of the Annunciation Cathedral.

Battle of Kosovo Field. 1389

This theme in its programmatic, most developed form is embodied in the first Russian “battle picture” - “The Militant Church”. A direct revelation of its subtext are the paintings of the tomb of Ivan IV (in the deaconry of the Archangel Cathedral), as well as the system of paintings of the cathedral as a whole (if we assume that its painting that has survived to this day completely repeats the painting carried out no later than 1566). Even if we remain within the most cautious assumptions about the preservation of earlier paintings, one cannot help but see that the military themes included in the murals directly lead to the cycle of Old Testament battle scenes in the paintings of the Golden Chamber, in which contemporaries found direct analogies with the history of Kazan and Astrakhan taking. To this should be added personal, “autobiographical” themes, if this is how we can talk about the subjects of the murals of the Archangel Cathedral (the main tomb of Grozny) and the Golden Chamber, and partly the icon-painting “Church Militant”. Finally, the main Christological, or symbolic-dogmatic, cycle of icons made according to the “sovereign order” is associated with the main compositions of the painting of the Golden Chamber, being a visual expression of the entire system of religious and philosophical views of that group, which is usually called the “government of the 50s” and which included both representatives of the “elected Rada” and the head of the Russian Church - Metropolitan Macarius. Being addressed to relatively wide circles of the people, this painting also had another purpose - a constant reminder of the basic religious and philosophical principles to the young king, whose “correction” was undertaken by his closest members of the “elected council.” This is also evidenced by the presence in the system of painting of the Golden Chamber of compositions on the theme of the Tale of Varlaam and Joasaph, in which contemporaries tended to see the story of the moral renewal of Ivan IV himself, and by Varlaam they meant the same all-powerful Sylvester. Thus, before us are, as it were, links of a single plan. Themes, starting in one of the monuments, continue to be revealed in subsequent ones, read in direct sequence in works of different types of fine art.

Facial chronicle vault(Front chronicle collection of Ivan the Terrible, Tsar Book) - a chronicle collection of events in world and especially Russian history, created in the 40-60s of the 16th century (probably in 1568-1576) specifically for the royal library in a single copy. The word “facial” in the title of the Code means illustrated, with images “in faces”. Consists of 10 volumes containing about 10 thousand sheets of rag paper, decorated with more than 16 thousand miniatures. Covers the period “from the creation of the world” to 1567. The front (i.e., illustrated, with the image “in the faces”) chronicle vault is not only a monument of Russian handwritten books and a masterpiece of ancient Russian literature. This is a literary, historical, artistic monument of world significance. It is no coincidence that it is unofficially called the Tsar-Book (by analogy with the Tsar-Cannon and the Tsar-Bell). The facial chronicle was created in the 2nd half of the 16th century by order of Tsar Ivan IV Vasilyevich the Terrible in a single copy for his children. Metropolitan and “sovereign” artisans worked on the books of the Front Vault: about 15 scribes and 10 artists. The arch consists of about 10 thousand sheets and over 17 thousand illustrations, and the visual material occupies about 2/3 of the entire volume of the monument. Miniature drawings (landscape, historical, battle and everyday life genres) not only illustrate the text, but also complement it. Some events are not written, but only drawn. The drawings tell readers what clothing, military armor, church vestments, weapons, tools, household items, etc. looked like in ancient times. In the history of world medieval writing, there is no monument similar to the Front Chronicle, both in breadth of coverage and in volume. It included sacred, Hebrew and ancient Greek history, stories about the Trojan War and Alexander the Great, stories from the history of the Roman and Byzantine empires, as well as a chronicle covering the most important events in Russia for four and a half centuries: from 1114 to 1567. (It is assumed that the beginning and end of this chronicle, namely the Tale of Bygone Years, a significant part of the history of the reign of Ivan the Terrible, as well as some other fragments, have not been preserved.) In the Litsevoy Vault, the history of the Russian state is considered inextricably with world history.

The volumes are grouped in relatively chronological order:

• Bible story
• History of Rome
• History of Byzantium
• Russian history

Contents of volumes:

1. Museum collection (GIM). 1031 sheets, 1677 miniatures. An account of sacred, Hebrew and Greek history from the creation of the world to the destruction of Troy in the 13th century. BC e.
2. Chronographic collection (BAN). 1469 sheets, 2549 miniatures. An account of the history of the ancient East, the Hellenistic world and ancient Rome from the 11th century. BC e. until the 70s I century n. e.
3. Face Chronograph (RNB). 1217 sheets, 2191 miniatures. Outline of the history of the ancient Roman Empire from the 70s. I century to 337 and Byzantine history to the 10th century.
4. Golitsyn volume (RNB). 1035 sheets, 1964 miniatures. Outline of Russian history for 1114-1247 and 1425-1472.
5. Laptev volume (RNB). 1005 sheets, 1951 miniature. Outline of Russian history for 1116-1252.
6. Osterman's first volume (BAN). 802 sheets, 1552 miniatures. Outline of Russian history for 1254-1378.
7. Osterman's second volume (BAN). 887 sheets, 1581 miniatures. Outline of Russian history for 1378-1424.
8. Shumilovsky volume (RNL). 986 sheets, 1893 miniatures. Outline of Russian history for 1425, 1478-1533.
9. Synodal volume (GIM). 626 l, 1125 miniatures. Outline of Russian history for 1533-1542, 1553-1567.
10. Royal Book (GIM). 687 sheets, 1291 miniatures. Outline of Russian history for 1533-1553

History of the creation of the vault:

The vault was probably created in 1568-1576. (according to some sources, work began in the 1540s), commissioned by Ivan the Terrible, in Aleksandrovskaya Sloboda, which was then the residence of the Tsar. In particular, Alexey Fedorovich Adashev took part in the work. The creation of the Facial Chronicle lasted intermittently for more than 30 years. The text was prepared by scribes from the entourage of Metropolitan Macarius, the miniatures were executed by masters of the metropolitan and “sovereign” workshops. The presence in the illustrations of the Facial Chronicle corpus of images of buildings, structures, clothing, tools of craft and agriculture, household items, corresponding in each case to the historical era, indicates the existence of more ancient illustrated chronicles, which served as models for the illustrators of the Facial Chronicle corpus Illustrative material, occupying about 2/3 The entire volume of the Facial Chronicle contains a developed system of illustrating historical texts. Within the illustrations of the Facial Chronicle, one can talk about the origin and formation of landscape, historical, battle and everyday genres. Around 1575, amendments were made to the text concerning the reign of Ivan the Terrible (apparently under the leadership of the Tsar himself). Initially the vault was not bound - binding was carried out later, at different times.

Storage:

The only original copy of the Code is stored separately, in three places (in different “baskets”):

State Historical Museum (volumes 1, 9, 10)

Library of the Russian Academy of Sciences (volumes 2, 6, 7)

Russian National Library (volumes 3, 4, 5, 8)

Cultural influence and meaning. B. M. Kloss described the Code as “the largest chronicle-chronographic work of medieval Rus'.” The miniatures from the Code are widely known and used both in the form of illustrations and in art.

The “Makaryev school” of painting, the “school of Grozny” are concepts that cover a little more than three decades in the life of Russian art of the second half (or, more precisely, the third quarter) of the 16th century. These years are full of facts, rich in works of art, characterized by a new attitude to the tasks of art, its role in the general structure of the young centralized state, and, finally, they are notable for their attitude towards the creative personality of the artist and attempts to regulate his activities, more than ever to subordinate them to the tasks polemical, to involve in participation in the intense dramatic action of state life. For the first time in the history of Russian artistic culture, issues of art became the subject of debate at two church councils (1551 and 1554). For the first time, a pre-developed plan for the creation of numerous works of different types of art (monumental and easel painting, book illustration and applied art, in particular wood carving) predetermined themes, plots, emotional interpretation and, to a large extent, served as the basis for a complex set of images designed to reinforce, to justify and glorify the rule and deeds of the first “crowned autocrat” who ascended the throne of the centralized Russian state. And it was at this time that a grandiose artistic project was being carried out: the front chronicle of Ivan the Terrible, the Tsar-Book - a chronicle of events in world and especially Russian history, written, probably in 1568-1576, especially for the royal library in a single copy. The word “facial” in the title of the Code means illustrated, with images “in faces”. Consists of 10 volumes containing about 10 thousand sheets of rag paper, decorated with more than 16 thousand miniatures. Covers the period “from the creation of the world” to 1567. A grandiose “paper” project of Ivan the Terrible!

Face chronograph. RNB.

The chronological framework of these phenomena in the artistic life of the Russian centralized state in the second half of the 16th century. determined by one of the most significant events of that time - the crowning of Ivan IV. The wedding of Ivan IV (January 16, 1547) opened a new period of establishment of autocratic power, being a kind of result of a long process of formation of a centralized state and the struggle for the unity of Rus', subordinate to the power of the Moscow autocrat. That is why the very act of crowning Ivan IV, which served as the subject of repeated discussions among the future participants of the “elected council”, as well as among the inner circle of Metropolitan Macarius, was, as historians have already said more than once, furnished with exceptional pomp. Based on literary sources from the end of the previous century, Macarius developed the very ritual of the royal wedding, introducing the necessary symbolism into it. A convinced ideologist of autocratic power, Macarius did everything possible to emphasize the exclusivity (“God’s chosenness”) of the power of the Moscow autocrat, the original rights of the Moscow sovereign, with references to historical analogies in the field of civil history and, above all, the history of Byzantium, Kievan and Vladimir-Suzdal Rus'.

Royal book.

The ideology of autocracy should, according to Macarius’s plan, be reflected in the written sources of the era and, first of all, the chronicle, books of the royal genealogy, the circle of annual reading, which were the Chetya Menaion compiled under his leadership, and also, apparently, it was intended to turn to the creation of appropriate works of fine art. That the plans for addressing all types of artistic culture were grandiose from the very beginning is shown by the scope of literary works of that time. It is difficult, however, to imagine what forms the implementation of these plans in the field of fine art would have taken and in what time frame they would have been realized, if not for the fire in June 1547, which devastated the vast territory of the city. As the chronicle says, on Tuesday, June 21, “at 10 o’clock on the third week of Peter’s Lent, the Church of the Exaltation of the Honorable Cross behind Neglimnaya on Arbatskaya Street caught fire... And a great storm came, and fire began to flow, like lightning, and the fire was intense... And the storm turned into a larger hail, and the cathedral church of the Most Pure Top caught fire in the city, and in the royal courtyard of the Grand Duke on the roof sheets, and the wooden huts, and the sheets decorated with gold, and the Treasury courtyard and with the royal treasury, and the church in the royal courtyard royal treasuries The Annunciation is golden-topped, Andreev's Deesis of Rublev's letters, overlaid with gold, and images decorated with gold and beads of valuable Greek letters of his ancestors collected from many years... And in many stone churches, Deesis and images, and church vessels, and many human bellies were burnt out , and the Metropolitan's courtyard." “...And in the city all the courtyards and roofs are burning, and the Chudovsky monastery is all burning, the only relics of the great holy miracle worker Alexei were quickly preserved by the mercy of God... And the Ascension Monastery is also all burning, ...and the Church of the Ascension is burning, images and vessels Church and human lives are many, only the archpriest brought out one image of the Most Pure One. And all the courtyards in the city were burnt, and in the city the roof of the city, and the cannon potion, wherever in the city, and those places where the city walls were torn apart... In one hour, a lot of people burned, 1,700 men and women and babies, a lot of people burned people along Tferskaya Street, and along Dmitrovka, and on Bolshoy Posad, along Ilyinskaya Street, in Gardens.” The fire on June 21, 1547, which began in the first half of the day, continued until night: “And in the third hour of the night the fiery flame ceased.” As is clear from the above chronicle evidence, buildings in the royal court were severely damaged, numerous works of art were destroyed and partly damaged.

Battle on the Ice. Chronicle miniature from the Front Vault of the 16th century.

But Moscow residents suffered even more. On the second day, the tsar and the boyars gathered at the bedside of Metropolitan Macarius, who was injured in the fire, “to think” - the state of mind of the masses was discussed, and the tsar’s confessor, Fyodor Barmin, reported on the spread of rumors about the cause of the fire, which black people explained by the witchcraft of Anna Glinskaya. Ivan IV was forced to order an investigation. In addition to F. Barmin, Prince Fyodor Skopin Shuisky, Prince Yuri Temkin, I. P. Fedorov, G. Yu. Zakharyin, F. Nagoy and “many others” took part in it. Alarmed by the fire, the Moscow black people, as the course of further events explains in the Continuation of the Chronograph of 1512 and the Chronicler Nikolsky, gathered at a meeting and on Sunday morning, June 26, entered the Kremlin’s Cathedral Square “to the sovereign’s court,” seeking trial of the perpetrators of the fire (the perpetrators of the fire , as stated above, the Glinskys were revered). Yuri Glinsky tried to hide in the Dmitrovsky chapel of the Assumption Cathedral. The rebels entered the cathedral, despite the ongoing divine service, and during the “Cherubim song” they extracted Yuri and killed him in front of the metropolitan seat, dragged him outside the city and threw him at the place of execution of the criminals. The Glinsky people were “beaten countless times and their stomachs were razed by the princess.” One might have thought that the murder of Yuri Glinsky was an “execution” dressed in a “traditional” and “legal” form.

Mityai (Mikhail) and St. Dionysius before the leader. book Dimitry Donskoy.

Miniature from the Facial Chronicle. 70s XVI century

This is evidenced by the fact that Glinsky’s body was taken out for auction and thrown “before the stake, where they would be executed.” The black people's protest did not end there. On June 29, armed and in battle formation, they (at the “cry of the executioner” or “birich”) moved to the royal residence in Vorobyovo. Their ranks were so formidable (they were with shields and spears) that Ivan IV was “surprised and horrified.” Black people demanded the extradition of Anna Glinskaya and her son Mikhail. The scale of the action of black people turned out to be quite large; the readiness for military action testified to the strength of the people's anger. This uprising was preceded by protests of the dissatisfied in the cities (in the summer of 1546, the Novgorod pishchalniks spoke out, and on June 3, 1547, the Pskovites, complaining about the royal governor Turuntai), and it is clear that the size of the popular unrest should have made a formidable impression not only on Ivan IV. The inner circle of the young tsar, who determined the policy of the 30s - 50s, had to take them into account. The organized uprising of the Moscow lower classes was mainly directed against boyar autocracy and arbitrariness, which was especially painfully reflected in the destinies of the broad masses during the youth of Ivan IV, and had a certain impact on the further development of domestic politics.

One of the books of the Front Vault of the 16th century.

Most likely, those historians who consider the Moscow uprising after the fire of 1547 to be inspired by opponents of boyar autocracy are right. It is not unreasonable to try to find the inspirers of the uprising in the inner circle of Ivan IV. However, inspired from the outside, it, reflecting the protest of the broad masses against boyar oppression, as we know, took on an unexpected scope, although it coincided in its direction with the new trends of the emerging government of the 50s. But at the same time, its scale, speed and strength of the popular reaction to the events were such that it was impossible not to take into account the significance of the speech and those deep social reasons that, regardless of the influence of the ruling political parties, gave rise to popular unrest. All this aggravated the complexity of the political situation and greatly contributed to the breadth of ideas and searches for the most effective means of ideological influence, among which works of fine art that were new in their content occupied a significant place. One might think that when developing a plan for political and ideological measures to influence broad public circles, it was decided to turn to one of the most accessible and familiar educational means - to formal and monumental painting, due to the capacity of its images, capable of leading from the usual edifying themes to more broad historical generalizations. A certain experience of this kind developed already during the reign of first Ivan III, and later Vasily III. In addition to influencing the Moscow black people, as well as the boyars and service people, the works of painting were intended to have a direct educational effect on the young Tsar himself. Like many literary endeavors carried out in the circle of Metropolitan Macarius and the “chosen council” - and the leading role of Macarius as the ideologist of autocratic power should not be underestimated - the works of painting in their essential part contained not only “justifications of the policy” of the tsar, but also revealed those basic ideas that were supposed to inspire Ivan IV himself and determine the general direction of his activities.

Ivan the Terrible at the wedding of Simeon Bekbulatovich.

It was important to interest Ivan IV in the general plan of restoration work to such an extent that their ideological orientation would, as if predetermined by the sovereign himself, come from him (remember that somewhat later the Stoglavy Cathedral was organized in a similar way). The initiative for restoration work was divided between Metropolitan Macarius, Sylvester and Ivan IV, who, naturally, had to officially lead. All these relationships can be traced in the very course of events, as the chronicle sets them out, and most importantly, as evidenced by the materials of the “Viskovaty case”. The interior of the temples burned out, and the fire did not spare the royal home or the royal treasury. Leaving churches without shrines was not the custom of Muscovite Rus'. Ivan IV, first of all, “sent holy and honorable icons to the cities, to Veliky Novgorod, and to Smolensk, and to Dmitrov, and Zvenigorod, and from many other cities, they brought many wonderful holy icons and at the Annunciation they set them up for veneration for the Tsar and all the peasants " Following this, restoration work began. One of the active participants in the organization of restoration work was Priest Sylvester, who himself served in the Annunciation Cathedral - as is known, one of the most influential figures of the “elected council”. Sylvester tells in detail about the progress of the work in his “Complaint” to the “consecrated cathedral” of 1554, from where one can glean information about the organization and performers of the work, and about the sources of iconography, and about the process of ordering and “acceptance” of works, as well as about the role and relationships Metropolitan Macarius, Ivan IV and Sylvester himself during the creation of new monuments of painting.

Shchelkanovschina. Popular uprising against the Tatars in Tver. 1327.

Miniature from the Front Chronicle of the 16th century

“The Complaint” allows one to judge the number of invited masters, as well as the very fact of inviting masters, and most importantly, about those artistic centers from which cadres of painters were drawn: “the sovereign sent icon painters to Novgorod, and to Pskov and to other cities, icon painters came together , and the Tsar Sovereign ordered them to paint icons, whoever was ordered to do what, and ordered others to sign the plates and to paint images at the city over the gates of the saints.” Thus, the areas of activity of painters are immediately determined: easel painting (icon painting), secular ward painting, creation of gate icons (it is possible to understand them as mural painting and as easel painting). Sylvester names two cities as the main artistic centers from which masters come: Novgorod and Pskov, and it is very interesting how the relationship between the masters and the organizers of the order develops. All from the same “Complaint” of Sylvester, as well as from his message to his son Anfim, one can judge the leading role of Sylvester in organizing the leadership of the squad itself, which carried out painting work after the fire of 1547. In particular, with the Novgorod masters, Sylvester apparently had relations Habitual, well-coordinated relationships have long been established. He himself determines what they should order, where they can get the sources of iconography: “And I, reporting to the sovereign Tsar, ordered the Novgorod icon painters to paint the Holy Trinity, the Life-Giving One in the acts, and I Believe in one God, and Praise the Lord from heaven, and Sophia, the Wisdom God, yes it is worthy to eat, and the translation of the Trinity had icons, why write, but on Simonov.” But this was done if the plots were traditional. The situation was much more complicated when these translations did not exist.

Defense of Kozelsk, 16th century miniature from the Nikon Chronicle.

The other part of the work was entrusted to the Pskov residents. Their invitation was not unexpected. They turned to Pskov craftsmen back at the end of the 15th century. True, at that time they invited skilled builders, whereas now they invited icon painters. Macarius, in the recent past the Archbishop of Novgorod and Pskov, himself, as is known, a painter, in all likelihood, at one time established relations with Pskov masters. In any case, based on the completed orders, one can judge the rather significant size of the workshop at the archbishop's court in Novgorod. The generally accepted opinion is that this entire workshop, following Macarius, moved to the metropolitan court in Moscow. Macarius, being already a metropolitan, could maintain relations with the Pskovites through the priest of the Annunciation Cathedral, Pskov Semyon, the same one who presented his “Complaint” to the “consecrated cathedral” together with Sylvester. Obviously, the best masters from different cities were convened to fulfill such a complex order, which laid the foundation for the “royal school” of painters. The Pskovites, without explaining the reason, did not want to work in Moscow and undertook to fulfill the order, working at home: “And the Pskov icon painters Ostan, yes Yakov, yes Mikhail, yes Yakushko, and Semyon Vysoky Glagol and his comrades, took time off to Pskov and were there to paint four large icons":

1. Last Judgment

2. Renewal of the Temple of Christ our God of the Resurrection

3. The Passion of the Lord in the Gospel parables

4. Icon, there are four feasts on it: “And God rested on the seventh day from all his works, that the only begotten Son is the Word of God, that people come, let us worship the three-part Divinity, that in the carnal grave”

So, at the head of the entire grandiose plan of restoration work was the king, “reporting” to whom or “asking” whom (partly nominally), Sylvester distributed orders among painters, especially if there was an immediate opportunity to use samples.

Battle on the Ice. The flight of the Swedes to the ships.

It should be especially emphasized that the Moscow sources of traditional iconography were the Trinity-Sergius Monastery and the Simonov Monastery. (In written sources, until the second half of the 16th century, there was no information about an art workshop in Simonovo, despite the mention of the names of several masters who came from this monastery). It should also be recalled that among the authoritative sources of iconography, Novgorod and Pskov churches are also mentioned, in particular the murals of St. Sophia of Novgorod, the Church of St. George in the Yuryev Monastery, St. Nicholas on the Yaroslav's Courtyard, the Annunciation on the Settlement, St. John on Opoki, the Cathedral of the Life-Giving Trinity in Pskov, which is very characteristic of Novgorod connections between Sylvester and Macarius. Despite the fact that it would seem natural to consider Metropolitan Macarius himself as the main inspirer of the paintings, it is clear from the text of the “Complaint” that he played a rather passive role in the organizational side of the order. But he carried out the “acceptance” of the order, “performing a prayer service with the entire consecrated cathedral,” because the most important act of approbation from the point of view of church ideology was the moment of consecration of completed works, primarily works of easel, as well as monumental painting. Ivan IV could not do without the participation at this stage either - he distributed new icons to churches. Restoration work after the fire of 1547 was considered a matter of national importance, since Ivan IV himself, Metropolitan Macarius and Sylvester, the member of the “elected council” closest to Ivan IV, took care of their implementation.

Ivan the Terrible and royal icon painters.

It was in the era of Grozny that art was “deeply exploited by the state and the church,” and a rethinking of the role of art took place, the importance of which as an educational principle, a means of persuasion and an irresistible emotional impact increases immeasurably, at the same time the usual way of artistic life changes dramatically. The possibility of “free creative development of the artist’s personality” is reduced. The artist loses the simplicity and freedom of relationship with the client-parishioner, the church ktitor or the abbot - the builder of the monastery. Now orders of national importance are strictly regulated by ruling circles, which consider art as a conductor of certain political trends. Themes and plots of individual works or entire ensembles are discussed by representatives of state and church authorities, become the subject of debate at councils, and are specified in legislative documents. During these years, plans were developed for grandiose monumental ensembles, cycles of easel works and illustrations in handwritten books, which generally have common trends.

Construction of St. Basil's Cathedral (Intercession on the Moat) on Red Square.

A desire is revealed to connect the history of the Moscow state with world history, to show the “chosenness” of the Moscow state, which is the subject of “divine economy.” This idea is supported by numerous analogies from Old Testament history, the history of the Babylonian and Persian kingdoms, the monarchy of Alexander the Great, Roman and Byzantine history. It is not without reason that the chronographic volumes of the Front Chronicle were created with special attention and such thoroughness in the circle of Makaryev scribes. It is not for nothing that in the monumental ensembles of temple paintings and paintings of the Golden Chamber such a significant place was given to historical and Old Testament subjects, selected on the principle of direct analogy. At the same time, the entire cycle of works of fine art was permeated with the idea of ​​​​the divinity of the sovereign power, its establishment by God, its originality in Rus' and the direct succession of royal dignity from the Roman and Byzantine emperors and the continuity of the dynasty of “God-appointed sceptre-holders” from the princes of Kyiv and Vladimir to the sovereign of Moscow. All this taken together was intended to reinforce and justify the very fact of the crowning of Ivan IV, to justify the further course of autocratic policy not only in the Moscow state itself, but also in the face of the “Orthodox East”.

Ivan the Terrible sends ambassadors to Lithuania.

This was all the more necessary because the “approval” of the wedding of Ivan IV by the Patriarch of Constantinople was expected, which, as we know, took place only in 1561, when a “conciliar charter” was received. An equally important place in the overall plan was occupied by the idea of ​​glorifying the military actions of Ivan IV. His military performances were interpreted as religious wars in defense of the purity and inviolability of the Christian state from infidels, liberating Christian captives and civilians from Tatar invaders and oppressors. Finally, the topic of religious and moral education seemed no less significant. It was interpreted on two levels: more in-depth with a certain philosophical and symbolic connotation in the interpretation of basic Christian dogma and more directly - in terms of moral purification and improvement. The last topic was also of a personal nature - it was about the spiritual education and self-correction of the young autocrat. All these trends, or, more precisely, all these facets of a single ideological concept, were realized in different ways in individual works of art throughout the entire Grozny reign. The culmination of the discovery and implementation of this concept was the period of restoration work of 1547-1554. and more broadly - the time of activity of the “elected Rada”.

Battle of Kulikovo. 1380

After 1570 until the end of the reign of Ivan IV, as is known, the volume of work in the field of fine arts sharply decreased, the tension of emotional content, the feeling of uniqueness and chosenness gradually faded. It is replaced by another, more severe, sorrowful, and sometimes tragic. Echoes of triumph and self-affirmation, so characteristic in the initial period, only occasionally make themselves felt in individual works as belated reflections of the past, only to fade away completely in the early 80s. At the end of the reign of Ivan the Terrible, applied art came to the forefront in artistic life. If it becomes impossible to affirm and glorify the idea of ​​autocracy as such, then it is natural to add splendor to palace everyday life; palace utensils, like royal clothes, covered with patterns and jewelry, often turn into unique works of art. The nature of the literary works undertaken in order to “prepare” for the wedding in the circle of Metropolitan Macarius is noteworthy. Among them, the rite of crowning the kingdom itself, with its direct connection with the “Tale of the Princes of Vladimir,” should be especially highlighted. The story about Vladimir Monomakh receiving the royal crown and his coronation “to the kingdom” is contained in the Degree Book and the Great Menaions of the Fourth, i.e., literary monuments of the Makaryev circle. The initial volumes of the chronographic part of the Litsevoy Chronicle Code, as well as an expanded (compared to other lists of the Nikon Chronicle) edition of the text of the first six sheets of the Golitsyn volume of the Litsey Chronicle Code, also contain a narrative about the beginning of the reign of Vladimir Monomakh in Kyiv and about his crowning “to the kingdom” with regalia , sent by the Byzantine emperor. In direct connection with them are miniatures decorating the chronographic part of the Front Vault, as well as miniatures of the first six sheets of the Golitsyn volume. In the miniatures of the chronographic part of the Litsa Chronicle, in turn, there is further disclosure of the theme of the divine establishment of autocratic power, the introduction of Rus' into the general course of world history, as well as the idea of ​​​​the chosenness of the Moscow autocracy. Thus, a certain circle of literary monuments is designated. These same themes are further explored in the paintings of the Golden Chamber, in the reliefs of the royal seat (“Monomakh’s throne”) erected in the Assumption Cathedral, and in the painting of the portal of the Archangel Cathedral. The icons executed by the Pskovites, seemingly purely dogmatic in their content, carry within themselves the beginning, and perhaps also the revelation, of the theme of the sacred nature of the wars led by Ivan IV, the divinely chosen feat of warriors awarded the crowns of immortality and glory, which culminates in the icon “ Church Militant" and in the depiction of Christ - the conqueror of death in the "Four Parts" of the Annunciation Cathedral.

Battle of Kosovo Field. 1389

This theme in its programmatic, most developed form is embodied in the first Russian “battle picture” - “The Militant Church”. A direct revelation of its subtext are the paintings of the tomb of Ivan IV (in the deaconry of the Archangel Cathedral), as well as the system of paintings of the cathedral as a whole (if we assume that its painting that has survived to this day completely repeats the painting carried out no later than 1566). Even if we remain within the most cautious assumptions about the preservation of earlier paintings, one cannot help but see that the military themes included in the murals directly lead to the cycle of Old Testament battle scenes in the paintings of the Golden Chamber, in which contemporaries found direct analogies with the history of Kazan and Astrakhan taking. To this should be added personal, “autobiographical” themes, if this is how we can talk about the subjects of the murals of the Archangel Cathedral (the main tomb of Grozny) and the Golden Chamber, and partly the icon-painting “Church Militant”. Finally, the main Christological, or symbolic-dogmatic, cycle of icons made according to the “sovereign order” is associated with the main compositions of the painting of the Golden Chamber, being a visual expression of the entire system of religious and philosophical views of that group, which is usually called the “government of the 50s” and which included both representatives of the “elected Rada” and the head of the Russian Church - Metropolitan Macarius. Being addressed to relatively wide circles of the people, this painting also had another purpose - a constant reminder of the basic religious and philosophical principles to the young king, whose “correction” was undertaken by his closest members of the “elected council.” This is also evidenced by the presence in the system of painting of the Golden Chamber of compositions on the theme of the Tale of Varlaam and Joasaph, in which contemporaries tended to see the story of the moral renewal of Ivan IV himself, and by Varlaam they meant the same all-powerful Sylvester. Thus, before us are, as it were, links of a single plan. Themes, starting in one of the monuments, continue to be revealed in subsequent ones, read in direct sequence in works of different types of fine art.

Facial chronicle vault(Front chronicle collection of Ivan the Terrible, Tsar Book) - a chronicle collection of events in world and especially Russian history, created in the 40-60s of the 16th century (probably in 1568-1576) specifically for the royal library in a single copy. The word “facial” in the title of the Code means illustrated, with images “in faces”. Consists of 10 volumes containing about 10 thousand sheets of rag paper, decorated with more than 16 thousand miniatures. Covers the period “from the creation of the world” to 1567. The front (i.e., illustrated, with the image “in the faces”) chronicle vault is not only a monument of Russian handwritten books and a masterpiece of ancient Russian literature. This is a literary, historical, artistic monument of world significance. It is no coincidence that it is unofficially called the Tsar-Book (by analogy with the Tsar-Cannon and the Tsar-Bell). The facial chronicle was created in the 2nd half of the 16th century by order of Tsar Ivan IV Vasilyevich the Terrible in a single copy for his children. Metropolitan and “sovereign” artisans worked on the books of the Front Vault: about 15 scribes and 10 artists. The arch consists of about 10 thousand sheets and over 17 thousand illustrations, and the visual material occupies about 2/3 of the entire volume of the monument. Miniature drawings (landscape, historical, battle and everyday life genres) not only illustrate the text, but also complement it. Some events are not written, but only drawn. The drawings tell readers what clothing, military armor, church vestments, weapons, tools, household items, etc. looked like in ancient times. In the history of world medieval writing, there is no monument similar to the Front Chronicle, both in breadth of coverage and in volume. It included sacred, Hebrew and ancient Greek history, stories about the Trojan War and Alexander the Great, stories from the history of the Roman and Byzantine empires, as well as a chronicle covering the most important events in Russia for four and a half centuries: from 1114 to 1567. (It is assumed that the beginning and end of this chronicle, namely the Tale of Bygone Years, a significant part of the history of the reign of Ivan the Terrible, as well as some other fragments, have not been preserved.) In the Litsevoy Vault, the history of the Russian state is considered inextricably with world history.

The volumes are grouped in relatively chronological order:

• Bible story
• History of Rome
• History of Byzantium
• Russian history

Contents of volumes:

1. Museum collection (GIM). 1031 sheets, 1677 miniatures. An account of sacred, Hebrew and Greek history from the creation of the world to the destruction of Troy in the 13th century. BC e.
2. Chronographic collection (BAN). 1469 sheets, 2549 miniatures. An account of the history of the ancient East, the Hellenistic world and ancient Rome from the 11th century. BC e. until the 70s I century n. e.
3. Face Chronograph (RNB). 1217 sheets, 2191 miniatures. Outline of the history of the ancient Roman Empire from the 70s. I century to 337 and Byzantine history to the 10th century.
4. Golitsyn volume (RNB). 1035 sheets, 1964 miniatures. Outline of Russian history for 1114-1247 and 1425-1472.
5. Laptev volume (RNB). 1005 sheets, 1951 miniature. Outline of Russian history for 1116-1252.
6. Osterman's first volume (BAN). 802 sheets, 1552 miniatures. Outline of Russian history for 1254-1378.
7. Osterman's second volume (BAN). 887 sheets, 1581 miniatures. Outline of Russian history for 1378-1424.
8. Shumilovsky volume (RNL). 986 sheets, 1893 miniatures. Outline of Russian history for 1425, 1478-1533.
9. Synodal volume (GIM). 626 l, 1125 miniatures. Outline of Russian history for 1533-1542, 1553-1567.
10. Royal Book (GIM). 687 sheets, 1291 miniatures. Outline of Russian history for 1533-1553

History of the creation of the vault:

The vault was probably created in 1568-1576. (according to some sources, work began in the 1540s), commissioned by Ivan the Terrible, in Aleksandrovskaya Sloboda, which was then the residence of the Tsar. In particular, Alexey Fedorovich Adashev took part in the work. The creation of the Facial Chronicle lasted intermittently for more than 30 years. The text was prepared by scribes from the entourage of Metropolitan Macarius, the miniatures were executed by masters of the metropolitan and “sovereign” workshops. The presence in the illustrations of the Facial Chronicle corpus of images of buildings, structures, clothing, tools of craft and agriculture, household items, corresponding in each case to the historical era, indicates the existence of more ancient illustrated chronicles, which served as models for the illustrators of the Facial Chronicle corpus Illustrative material, occupying about 2/3 The entire volume of the Facial Chronicle contains a developed system of illustrating historical texts. Within the illustrations of the Facial Chronicle, one can talk about the origin and formation of landscape, historical, battle and everyday genres. Around 1575, amendments were made to the text concerning the reign of Ivan the Terrible (apparently under the leadership of the Tsar himself). Initially the vault was not bound - binding was carried out later, at different times.

Storage:

The only original copy of the Code is stored separately, in three places (in different “baskets”):

State Historical Museum (volumes 1, 9, 10)

Library of the Russian Academy of Sciences (volumes 2, 6, 7)

Russian National Library (volumes 3, 4, 5, 8)

Cultural influence and meaning. B. M. Kloss described the Code as “the largest chronicle-chronographic work of medieval Rus'.” The miniatures from the Code are widely known and used both in the form of illustrations and in art.

The facial chronicle code of the second half of the 16th century is the pinnacle achievement of ancient Russian book art. It has no analogues in the world culture of this century. The facial vault is also the largest chronicle work in terms of volume in Ancient Rus'.

In the Middle Ages, illuminated (illustrated) manuscripts with images of people - “in faces” - were called obverse. The Facial Vault contains about 10 thousand handwritten sheets and more than 17 thousand miniatures. The facial vault has long attracted the attention of art critics, bibliologists, and historians - especially those who study the problems of the development of public consciousness, the history of spiritual and material culture, and the state and political history of the time of Ivan the Terrible. This precious cultural monument is unusually rich in information for those who specifically study the features of historical sources of various types - verbal, written (and where there are postscripts, oral, directly capturing the spoken language), pictorial, material, behavioral.

The work on compiling the Facial Code was not completely completed. Bales of sheets remained in the 17th century. unintertwined. No later than the first half of the 18th century. arrays of leaves of the colossal chronicle were already dispersed. They were intertwined independently of each other; and some of these resulting volumes were named after their owner (or one of the owners during the 17th-19th centuries). Gradually, the Facial Vault began to be perceived as a monumental body of ten huge volumes. At the same time, it turned out that individual sheets and even arrays of sheets were lost, and when bound into books, the order of the sheets was sometimes disrupted.

Conventionally, this ten-volume manuscript corpus can be divided into three parts: three volumes of world history, seven volumes of national history; of which five volumes are a chronicle of the “old years” (for the years 1114-1533), two volumes are a chronicle of the “new years”, i.e. during the reign of Ivan IV. It is believed that sheets about the initial history of the Fatherland (before 1114), possibly about the world history of the X-XV centuries, until the time after the fall of the Byzantine Empire, as well as sheets outlining the events of the national history of the last decade and a half of Ivan’s reign have not reached us IV (or preparations for them), since in the middle of the 18th century. The sheets about the crowning of Fyodor Ivanovich were still preserved.

The company "AKTEON" together with the curators for the first time produced a scientific facsimile publication of the "Facebook Chronicle of the 16th Century".

The so-called “people's edition” is a complement to the scientific apparatus of the above-mentioned facsimile. It fully reproduces the miniatures and Old Russian text of each sheet of the manuscript. At the same time, transliteration and translation into modern Russian are shown on the external field. The sheets are arranged in chronological order of the story.

First section:

Biblical history in 5 books. These are the historical books of the Old Testament: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, the Book of Joshua, the Book of Judges of Israel, Ruth, the Four Books of Kings, the Book of Tobit, the Book of Esther, as well as the Visions of the Prophet Daniel, including the history of ancient Persia and Babylon, history ancient Rome.

Facial chronicle vault of the 16th century. Biblical history - Imprint by volume

• Facial chronicle vault of the 16th century. Biblical history. Book 1. - M.: LLC "Firm "AKTEON", 2014. - 598 p.
• Facial chronicle vault of the 16th century. Biblical history. Book 2. - M.: LLC "Firm "AKTEON", 2014. - 640 p.
• Facial chronicle vault of the 16th century. Biblical history. Book 3. - M.: LLC "Firm "AKTEON", 2014. - 670 p.
• Facial chronicle vault of the 16th century. Biblical history. Book 4. - M.: LLC "Firm "AKTEON", 2014. - 504 p.
• Facial chronicle vault of the 16th century. Biblical history. Companion volume. - M.: LLC "Firm "AKTEON", 2014. - 212 p.

Facial chronicle of the 16th century - Biblical history - Contents by volume

• Biblical history. Book 1 contains a summary of the Bible Books: Genesis; Book 2 - Exodus; Book 3 - Leviticus.
• Biblical history. Book 2 contains a summary of the Bible Books: Numbers; Deuteronomy; Book of Joshua; Book of Judges of Israel; Book of Ruth.
• Biblical history. Book 3 contains a summary of the Bible Books called the Four Books of Kings.
• Biblical history. Book 4 contains a summary of the Bible Books: The Book of Tobit; Book of Esther; Book of the Prophet Daniel; History of ancient Persia and Babylon; The beginning of the kingdom of Rome.

Front chronicle of the 16th century - Biblical history - From the publisher

The front (that is, illustrated “in faces”, with images of people) chronicle collection, created in a single copy for Tsar Ivan the Terrible, his legendary book collection is a book monument that occupies a special place in world culture. On 10 thousand sheets with more than 17 thousand colorful miniatures - “windows on history” - the earliest historical and literary encyclopedia is presented. It brings together the first illustrated Bible in the Slavic language, such artistic historical works as the Trojan War, Alexandria, the Jewish War of Josephus, etc., as well as weather (by year) chronicles, stories, legends, lives of Russian chronicle history.

The facial vault is the largest chronographic work of medieval Rus'. It has survived to this day in 10 volumes.

Currently, the volumes of the Litsevoy vault are in different book depositories in Russia: three volumes (Museum collection, Synodal volume and the Royal Book) - in the manuscript department of the State Historical Museum (Moscow), four volumes (Litsevoy Chronograph, Golitsynsky volume, Laptevsky volume, Shumilovsky volume) in the Russian National Library (St. Petersburg) and three volumes (Chronographic collection, Osterman's first volume, Osterman's second volume) in the manuscript department of the Library of the Academy of Sciences (St. Petersburg).

The first three volumes of the Facial Code tell about the events of biblical and world history, following in chronological order, and include outstanding works of world literature that form the basis of book culture. They were recommended reading for medieval Russian people.

Volume 1 - Museum collection (1031 sheets) contains a presentation of sacred and world history, starting from the creation of the world: the Slavic text of the first seven books of the Old Testament, the history of the legendary Troy in two versions. The first part of the Museum Collection is a unique Russian obverse Bible, distinguished by the utmost completeness of the content reflected in the illustrations, and corresponds to the canonical text of the Gennady Bible of 1499.

After the biblical books comes the Trojan History, presented in two versions: the first is one of the earliest copies of the medieval Latin novel “The History of the Destruction of Great Troy,” created at the end of the 13th century by Guido de Columna. The second version of the Trojan story is “The Tale of the Creation and Captivity of Troy,” compiled by Russian scribes based on earlier South Slavic works on the topic of the Trojan War, giving a different version of the events and destinies of the main characters.

Volume 2 - Chronographic collection (1469 sheets) contains an account of the history of the ancient East, the Hellenistic world and ancient Rome. The text of the Chronographic Collection consists of three large sections:

• I. Biblical books (Ruth - the last part of the Octateuch, the Four Books of Kings, the Book of Tobit, the Book of Esther).
• II. A story about the events of world history: the book of the biblical prophet Daniel with additions from the chronicles of George Amartol and John Malala, the history of ancient Persia and Babylon, the history of ancient Rome, the Biography of Alexander the Great, the history of the Roman Empire, which is woven into: the history of the events of the New Testament, the Word of Epiphanius the monk about the life of the Virgin Mary.
• III. The History of the Jewish War by Josephus (an outstanding work of world literature telling about the tragic events of the siege, assault and capture of Jerusalem by the Romans). The Author of the History was not only a witness, but also an active participant in the events described.

Volume 3 - Face Chronograph (1216 sheets) continues the story of the history of Rome and Byzantium, bringing the story to the 10th century. The text of the manuscript covers the history of Rome and Byzantium from the reign of the Roman Emperor Titus to the era of the Byzantine Emperor Constantine Porphyrogenitus.

Gg.) especially for the royal library in a single copy. The word “facial” in the title of the Code means illustrated, with images “in faces”.

Facial chronicle vault
Facial chronicle vault
Battle on the Ice . One of the miniatures of the Facial Chronicle vault
Trust the source	raises doubts
Other names	Facial vault of Ivan the Terrible, Tsar-Book
Date of writing	16th century (previously - gg.)
Original language	Church Slavonic
Describes	5509 BC e. - 1567 years
Genre	historical chronicle
Volume	10 volumes on 10 thousand sheets
Primary sources	Old Testament, Iliad, Hellenic and Roman Chronicler, Tale of Bygone Years (presumably)
Original	Tom The volumes are grouped in relatively chronological order: Bible story History of Rome History of Byzantium Russian history Museum collection (GIM). 1031 sheets, 1677 miniatures. An account of sacred, Hebrew and Greek history from the creation of the world to the destruction of Troy in the 13th century. BC e. Chronographic collection (BAN). 1469 sheets, 2549 miniatures. An account of the history of the ancient East, the Hellenistic world and ancient Rome from the 11th century. BC e. until the 70s I century n. e. Face Chronograph (RNB). 1217 sheets, 2191 miniatures. Outline of the history of the ancient Roman Empire from the 70s. I century to 337 and Byzantine history to the 10th century. Golitsyn volume (Royal Chronicler)(RNB, F.IV.225). 1035 sheets, 1964 miniatures. Outline of Russian history for 1114-1247 and 1425-1472. Laptev volume(RNB, F.IV.233). 1005 sheets, 1951 miniature. Outline of Russian history for 1116-1252. Osterman's first volume(BAN, 31.7.30-1). 802 sheets, 1552 miniatures. Outline of Russian history for 1254-1378. Osterman's second volume(BAN, 31.7.30-2). 887 sheets, 1581 miniatures. Outline of Russian history for 1378-1424. Shumilovsky volume(RNB, F.IV.232). 986 sheets, 1893 miniatures. Outline of Russian history for 1425, 1478-1533. Synodal volume(GIM, Syn. No. 962). 626 l, 1125 miniatures. Outline of Russian history for 1533-1542, 1553-1567. Royal book(GIM, Syn. No. 149). 687 sheets, 1291 miniatures. Outline of Russian history for 1533-1553. It is assumed that the beginning and end of this chronicle have not been preserved, namely the Tale of Bygone Years, part of the history of the reign of Ivan the Terrible, as well as some other fragments. History of the creation of the vault The miniatures from the Code are widely known and used both in the form of illustrations and in art. Facsimile edition (2008) In 2004, the Akteon publishing house, specially created for the release of a facsimile edition of the Personal Chronicle Code, began preparations for the release of the Code. The scientific facsimile edition consists of 19 facsimile books and 11 accompanying volumes with descriptions of manuscripts and transliteration of the text, which are subsequently transferred to the largest libraries in the country. The first three volumes were presented on February 15, 2007. A copy of the complete facsimile edition of the Personal Chronicle can be found in the library of the manuscript department of the State Historical Museum in Moscow and in the Pushkin House in St. Petersburg. Notes Literature Facial vault / V.V. Morozov // Great Russian Encyclopedia: [in 35 volumes] / ch. ed. Yu. S. Osipov. - M.: Great Russian Encyclopedia, 2004-2017. Artsikhovsky A.V. Old Russian miniatures as a historical source. - M., 1944.

The year 2010 for specialists studying Ancient Rus' and simply history buffs was marked by a very important event: the Facial Chronicle Code (popularly called the Tsar Book) was posted on the Internet for open access. It was scanned and placed on the World Wide Web by representatives of the Society of Lovers of Ancient Writing.

What is the importance of this event?

Agree that the most important thing in the work of every historian is primary sources: written, works of art, architecture, household items and other artifacts. Unfortunately, in our time, not many researchers of the past turn to them. Often they study and quote the works of other historians, and those of others, and so on. As a result, if you start to understand, most of these scientists have never used primary sources, and created all their works on the basis of other people’s words and opinions. It turns out that these works can be compared to a bad copy of a copy of some “blockbuster”. If you open and read what is written in an ancient document and compare the information with what modern historians write, you can often find not only minor inaccuracies, but sometimes completely opposite facts. That's how it is, and this kind of thing happens all the time.

Ancient artifacts of Rus'

Unfortunately, not as many authentic primary sources have survived to this day as we would like. If we consider architectural monuments, there are very few of them left, and besides, most of them date back to the 18th-19th centuries, because in Rus' the main building material is wood, and regular wars and fires do not spare such structures. If we take household items and jewelry, not everything is so simple here: what we managed to preserve are all artifacts from the 15th to 19th centuries. And this is also quite understandable, because precious metals and stones have always been the goal of various kinds of profit lovers and black archaeologists. Almost all ancient burial places (mounds, etc.) on the territory of our country were plundered back in the time of Catherine the Second.

Oral traditions

The most complete historical information about the history of our land has been preserved in the memory of the people - these are legends, traditions, fairy tales, epics, etc. However, scientists categorically deny the possibility of considering oral creativity as a source of information, at least in relation to what is connected with the past Rus', although they are ready to fully accept the legends of, say, the Scandinavian or British peoples. But in our fairy tales and legends many interesting facts have been preserved, a certain interpretation of which confirms one of the popular modern theories (A. Sklyarov “The Inhabited Island of Earth”). For example, we all know about such a fabulous wonder as a magic saucer with a poured apple in which the whole world is visible - why is this not an “iPhone” with its logo - a bitten fruit? What about flying carpets and walking boots? You never know what else...

However, we are very distracted, it’s time to return to the main topic of our article, and this, let us remind you, is the Facial Vault of Tsar Ivan (iv) the Terrible.

Written sources

The main written sources of Ancient Rus' are chronicles. Since the 19th century, the Complete Collection of Russian Chronicles began to be published. Anyone could familiarize themselves with this printed publication by contacting the library. However, work is now underway within the framework of the project “Manuscript Monuments of Ancient Rus'” to transfer it into digital format, and in the near future it, like the Facial Vault of Ivan the Terrible, will be posted on the Internet for public use. Beginning researchers should know that ancient manuscripts contain not only text, but also drawings. We are talking about illustrated documents. The main one is the Facial Vault. It consists of ten thousand sheets and seventeen thousand illustrations.

Facial chronicle vault

This document is the largest chronicle-chronographic collection of Ancient Rus'. It was created by order of the king in the period from 1568 to 1576. The front vault contains a statement of world history from the creation of the world to the 15th century and Russian history until the year 67 of the 16th century. Amosov A.A. calculated that this ancient artifact consists of ten volumes with a total of 9,745 sheets, which are decorated with 17,744 color miniatures. Historians have good reason to believe that the Tsar-Book also contained an eleventh volume. Now it has been lost, and this is understandable, because it dealt with the most controversial period of Russian history - before 1114.

Facial vault: content

The first three volumes contain the texts of biblical books such as the Pentateuch, the books of Judges, Joshua, Kings, as well as the books of Ruth, Esther, and the prophet Daniel. In addition, they present the complete texts of Alexandria, two narratives of the Trojan War ("The Tale of the Creation and Captivity of Troy", extracted from the "Russian Chronograph", and "The History of the Destruction of Troy" - a translation of the novel by Guido de Columna) and the work of Josephus " History of the Jewish War". For subsequent world events, the sources of information were the work “Illinsky and Roman Chronicler” and “Russian Chronograph”.

The Litsevoy vault describes the history of Rus' in 4-10 volumes, the source was mainly As researchers (for example, B. M. Kloss) claim, starting from the events of 1152, the document also contains additional sources, such as the Novgorod vault (1539), Resurrection Chronicle, “Chronicle of the Beginning of the Kingdom” and others.

Ancient editing

The Tsar Book has a number of edits; it is believed (though there is no evidence for this) that they were made around 1575 on the orders of Tsar Ivan the Terrible himself. The revision of the finished text affected mainly the period from 1533 to 1568. An unknown editor made notes in the margins of the document, some of which contain accusations against people who were repressed and executed during the oprichnina.

Unfortunately, the work on the Facial Vault was not completed: some of the miniatures were made only in ink sketches; they did not have time to paint them.

conclusions

The facial vault of Ivan the Terrible is not only a monument of Russian book art, but also a very important source of historical events: miniatures, despite all their conventionality and rather symbolic nature, provide rich material for research into the realities of that time. In addition, studying the editorial changes that were made to the last volume (“The Royal Book”) provides an opportunity to obtain more in-depth information about the political struggle of the post-oprichnik period. They also make it possible to judge the tsar’s changed assessments of the activities of one or another of his associates. And also about new views on the events themselves during his reign.

Finally

Thanks to the activities of the Society of Lovers of Ancient History, now everyone can get acquainted with this priceless artifact. After all, previously, in order to gain access to this document, it was necessary to make a lot of effort, and only historians could obtain it. But today it is available to everyone. All that is needed is access to the World Wide Web, and you can immerse yourself in the fascinating world of studying our past. See everything with your own eyes, form your own opinion about certain events, and not read the ready-made cliches of historians who, perhaps, have never even opened the original source.