Experts are confident that the world is on the verge of war and name 10 potential military conflicts that could break out literally tomorrow.

1. Sino-Russian Siberian War

One superpower is going through hard times. Another superpower is actually ready to conquer the whole world. At the moment, China and Russia are the “big players” in the territory east of the Ural Mountains. Both countries have huge armies. Both have nuclear weapons. Both are expansionist. And both have claims to Siberia, a sparsely populated, resource-rich territory larger than Canada. Siberia has long been in China's sphere of interest.
Recently, the Celestial Empire has begun actively buying up plots of Siberian land. Beijing is now beginning to make historic claims, at least in the eastern part of Siberia, where many ethnic Chinese live. This is becoming a growing problem for Moscow. A potential Sino-Russian war over Siberian territory could have devastating consequences and there are only two possible outcomes. Either the Chinese army will reconquer most of Russia or Moscow will start a nuclear war. In any case, the death toll will have catastrophic consequences for the entire world.

2. War for the Baltic

Recently, Europe has become quite worried about the possibility of war with Russia. According to former NATO deputy commander Alexander Richard Shirreff, this is a completely possible scenario. Shirreff believes a possible reason for this is Russia's reluctance to be surrounded by NATO countries. According to the British general, as early as May 2017, Moscow will build a land corridor through Ukraine connecting Crimea with Russia, and then invade one or more Baltic countries. Since Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania are members of NATO, this could lead to a crazy war between the West and Russia. What this threatens is not worth explaining.

3. North Korean Spring

This summer, a senior North Korean diplomat in London defected to South Korea. This was just the latest in a chain of incidents that point to the imminent collapse of Kim Jong-un's regime. Kim has fallen out with powerful allies such as China. He is no longer able to provide a luxurious life for the country's elite.
Cheap smartphone technology has allowed people in the country to see for the first time in decades how people live in the rest of the world. At the same time, a crisis is about to break out in the country, in comparison with which the 1994 famine will look like a walk in the park. The result of this could be a revolution in the DPRK. People could take to the streets, the army could split into warring factions, and hell would break out in the country.

4. ISIS guerrilla warfare in Europe

Faced with airstrikes, economic turmoil and military advances, ISIS is on the brink of collapse. But don't expect terrorists to just accept it. The jihadists are likely to fight directly in Europe through deadly urban guerrilla warfare. Large cities in Europe could turn into burial grounds, where explosions and gunfire will be heard on the streets every day. In such a scenario, France and Belgium would be the first to suffer, followed by Germany and the UK.

5. Civil war in Venezuela

Lawlessness reigns on the streets of Caracas. Ordinary household goods are simply impossible to buy, inflation is over 500 percent and could soon reach 1,600 percent. Civil protests, violence, corruption, police brutality and a paranoid government that refuses to see anything have become the norm in the country. The potential end result of this anarchy could be civil war.
With Maduro unwilling to step down, hungry and angry Venezuelans may take up arms. Mass desertions from the police and army are also possible. But even a coup may be the best course of events in Venezuela. Latin American history shows that such a move would likely result in repression and bloodshed on a horrifying scale.

6. Second Cultural Revolution in China

The Cultural Revolution under Chairman Mao was stunningly brutal. About 1.5 million people died. Millions of people were tortured and mutilated. Widespread corruption, popular discontent and a sense of betrayal escalated into deadly carnage.
But what happens in 2016, when China has become a developed country. China has a long history of peasant uprisings. Mao himself came to power as a result of an uprising during which 8,000,000 people died. Several decades ago, the Boxer Rebellion resulted in more than 100,000 deaths.
Decades earlier, the Taiping Rebellion killed 20-30 million (some estimates say more than 70 million).
Now, despite all the development, in China there are 500 popular protests every day, and about 100,000 riots break out every year. If another financial crisis suddenly erupts, there will again be catastrophic bloodshed.

7. Bosnia No. 2

In the 1990s, the world watched in horror as Bosnia fell apart. About 100,000 civilians died during ethnic cleansing. In 1995, two “states within a state” were eventually created: Bosnia and Herzegovina for the Bosniaks and Croats, and the Republika Srpska for the Serbs. The trouble is that this new division is also unstable. Ethnic divisions have created a world of growing tensions, bitter grievances and a desire for revenge. Today everyone wants the best.
Youth unemployment is over 60%, the highest level on Earth. Serbs and Croats still want to separate. Bosnians still want to live together. The Serbian leader recently literally “threw a burning match into this powder keg.” Ethnic Serbs will hold a referendum on whether to secede from Bosnia. The vote could reignite Bosnia's horrific civil war.

8. Revolution in Saudi Arabia

During the Arab Spring, Saudi Arabia escaped with a slight scare. While dictators were overthrown in Tunisia and Egypt, and real war broke out in Syria and Libya, members of the royal family in Saudi Arabia managed to retain power. At least until now. According to the American Washington Institute, conditions in Saudi Arabia today are similar to those that preceded the Egyptian revolution.
The nation is ready to explode. The collapse in oil prices has brought the country, which has very high levels of spending, to the brink of bankruptcy. Youth unemployment in a country that is predominantly populated by young people is out of control. Anger among educated twenty-somethings is running high. Local minorities are rebelling and terrorists are attacking relentlessly. It is easy to imagine a revolution that will break out in connection with this discontent.

9. Indo-Pakistan nuclear war

In the winter of 2008, the world stepped one foot into the grave. This year, the standoff between Pakistan and India almost escalated into a nuclear war. In the end, diplomats barely managed to resolve the conflict. But relations between both countries are still very tense. If things happen differently next time, it could mean the end of the world. A nuclear war between India and Pakistan would burn Delhi, Mumbai, Karachi and Islamabad and cause tens of millions to die in the inferno. A nuclear winter would destroy crops across Asia, leading to mass famines. It is estimated that about two billion people will die. And such a terrible conflict could be provoked by the situation in Kashmir, a region claimed by both countries.

10. South China Sea or World War III

The only thing more terrible than a war between Pakistan and India is a war between China and the United States. Especially if countries such as the Philippines, South Korea, Japan and many others are drawn into this conflict. The sticking point could be the South China Sea, a region that is likely to trigger a third world war.
Over the past few years, China has been aggressively expanding into the maritime space. This is mainly due to small countries that are allies of the United States. America responded with an official warning, and China responded with explicit threats. If this all develops into war, the world will perish.

Endless terrorist attacks, ongoing armed conflicts, and ongoing disagreements between Russia, the United States and the European Union indicate that peace on our planet is literally hanging by a thread. This situation is alarming for both politicians and ordinary people. It is no coincidence that the issue of starting the Third World War is being seriously discussed by the entire world community.

Expert opinion

Some political scientists believe that the mechanism of war was already launched several years ago. It all started in Ukraine, when a corrupt president was removed from office and the new government in the country was called illegitimate, and simply a junta. Then they announced to the whole world that it was fascist and they began to scare one sixth of the land with it. First mistrust and then outright enmity were sown in the minds of the people of the two fraternal peoples. A full-scale information war began, in which everything was subordinated to inciting hatred between people.

This confrontation was painful for the families, relatives, and friends of the two fraternal peoples. It has reached the point where politicians in the two countries are ready to pit brother against brother. The situation on the Internet also speaks to the danger of the situation. Various discussion platforms and forums have turned into real battlefields where everything is permitted.

If anyone still doubts the likelihood of war, they can simply go to any social network and see the intensity of discussions on topical topics, from information about oil prices to the upcoming Eurovision Song Contest.

If it is possible to quarrel two fraternal peoples who have shared grief and victory for more than 360 years, then what can we say about other countries. You can call any nation an enemy overnight by preparing timely information support in the media and the Internet. This is what happened with Turkey, for example.

Currently, Russia is testing new methods of war using the example of Crimea, Donbass, Ukraine, and Syria. Why deploy multimillion-dollar armies, transfer troops, if you can carry out a “successful information attack”, and to top it off, send a small contingent of “little green men”. Fortunately, there is already positive experience in Georgia, Crimea, Syria and the Donbass.

Some political observers believe that it all started in Iraq, when the United States decided to remove the allegedly undemocratic president and carried out Operation Desert Storm. As a result, the country's natural resources came under US control.

Having gained a little fat in the 2000s and having carried out a number of military operations, Russia decided not to give in and prove to the whole world that it had “rose from its knees.” Hence such “decisive” actions in Syria, Crimea and Donbass. In Syria, we protect the whole world from ISIS, in Crimea, Russians from Bandera, in Donbass, the Russian-speaking population from Ukrainian punitive forces.

In fact, an invisible confrontation has already begun between the United States and Russia. America does not want to share its dominance in the world with the Russian Federation. Direct proof of this is present-day Syria.

Tension in different parts of the world, where the interests of the two countries come into contact, will only increase.

There are experts who believe that tension with America is caused by the fact that the latter is aware of the loss of its leading position against the backdrop of a strengthening China and wants to destroy Russia in order to take possession of its natural resources. Various methods are being used to weaken the Russian Federation:

• EU sanctions;
• decline in oil prices;
• involvement of the Russian Federation in the arms race;
• support for protest sentiments in Russia.

America is doing everything to ensure that the situation of 1991, when the Soviet Union collapsed, is repeated.

War in Russia is inevitable in 2020

This point of view is shared by the American political analyst I. Hagopian. He posted his thoughts on this matter on the GlobalResears website. He noted that there are all signs of the US and Russia preparing for war. The author notes that America will be supported:

• NATO countries;
• Israel;
• Australia;
• all US satellites around the world.

Russia's allies include China and India. The expert believes that the United States is facing bankruptcy and will therefore make an attempt to seize the riches of the Russian Federation. He also emphasized that some states may disappear as a result of this conflict.

Former NATO leader A. Shirreff makes similar forecasts. For this purpose, he even wrote a book about the war with Russia. In it, he notes the inevitability of a military confrontation with America. According to the plot of the book, Russia is seizing the Baltic states. NATO countries are coming to its defense. As a result, World War III begins. On the one hand, the plot looks frivolous and implausible, but on the other hand, considering that the work was written by a retired general, the script looks quite plausible.

Who will win America or Russia

To answer this question it is necessary to compare the military power of the two powers:

Armament	Russia	USA
Active Army	1.4 million people	1.1 million people
Reserve	1.3 million people	2.4 million people
Airports and runways	1218	13513
Aircraft	3082	13683
Helicopters	1431	6225
Tanks	15500	8325
Armored vehicles	27607	25782
Self-propelled guns	5990	1934
Towed artillery	4625	1791
MLRS	4026	830
Ports and terminals	7	23
Warships	352	473
Aircraft carriers	1	10
Submarines	63	72
Attack ships	77	17
Budget	76 trillion	612 trillion

Success in war depends not only on superiority in weapons. As military expert J. Shields said, the Third World War will not be like the two previous wars. Combat operations will be carried out using computer technology. They will become more short-term, but the number of victims will be in the thousands. Nuclear weapons are unlikely to be used, but chemical and bacteriological weapons as an auxiliary means are not excluded.

Attacks will be launched not only on the battlefield, but also in:

• areas of communications;
• Internet;
• television;
• economics;
• finance;
• politics;
• space.

Something similar is now happening in Ukraine. The offensive is on all fronts. Blatant disinformation, hacker attacks on financial servers, sabotage in the economic field, discrediting politicians, diplomats, terrorist attacks, shutting down broadcast satellites and much more can cause irreparable damage to the enemy along with military operations at the front.

Psychic predictions

Throughout history there have been many prophets who predicted the end of humanity. One of them is Nostradamus. As for world wars, he accurately predicted the first two. Regarding the Third World War, he said that it would happen due to the fault of the Antichrist, who will stop at nothing and will be terribly merciless.

The next psychic whose prophecies came true is Vanga. She told future generations that World War III would begin with a small state in Asia. The fastest is Syria. The reason for military action will be an attack on four heads of state. The consequences of the war will be terrifying.

The famous psychic P. Globa also said his words regarding the Third World War. His forecasts can be called optimistic. He said that humanity will end World War III if it prevents military action in Iran.

The psychics listed above are not the only ones who predicted World War III. Similar predictions were made by:

• A. Ilmayer;
• Mulchiazl;
• Edgar Cayce;
• G. Rasputin;
• Bishop Anthony;
• Saint Hilarion and others

This article may seem scary. But we all live in a time when the start of a new war on a global scale is becoming a real prospect. In the article we will answer the question of whether the start date of the Third World War is predicted or not.

Modern warfare

In the minds of most people who grew up watching films based on the Great Patriotic War, the standard of military operations looks like a cutout from a film. Reasoning logically, we understand that just as ridiculous a saber from 1917 would look in the hands of a Soviet soldier in 1941, it would be strange to observe the picture of barbed wire cut at night by partisans in our time.

And you must admit, having weapons of mass destruction in the form of nuclear charges, bacteriological crops and climate control, it is paradoxical to expect a repetition of the classics in the form of a bayonet and a dugout.

The quiet panic, gradually eroding Internet users and skillfully fueled by the media, is felt in the thousands of requests received hourly. People are so convinced of the inevitability of trouble that they hardly ask questions - will it happen? The clumsy formulation sounds much more relevant: when is the exact date set for the start of the Third World War?

And this is already scary.

Battle for resources

The era when the main contribution to the winner were forests, fields, rivers and the defeated people has passed forever. Today, the greatness of a country is dictated not by population or rich history of victories, but by the possession of underground treasures: oil sources, natural gas deposits, coal seams, uranium deposits.

The date of the start of World War III is not kept silent. It simply passed so long ago that its exact date is unlikely to remain in our minds. The dream of the drivers of trade policy has come true - the economy and the struggle for first place in the leadership elite have become at the forefront of the main life values.

Here it is worth recalling the main method of trade relations, which works everywhere and at all times. The most choice piece never went to those bargaining and fighting for it - there was always a third person standing on the sidelines and sympathetically watching the fight.

Based on events: how can this be

Many will interfere, but only one will get it. It is no secret that the main threat to Russia is attributed to the United States, but the events unfolding around the world's largest leaders suggest that the general tension creates only the appearance of a real threat. The flow of information masterfully maintains the highest bar on the scale of mass hysteria, while the war unleashed by a powerful power (read - the USA) began a long time ago.

Events in Ukraine, Iraq and Syria speak not of spontaneous, but of carefully thought-out actions, which were worked on by hundreds of analysts with such a wealth of strategic experience that simply does not exist in any of these countries. After all, we are not talking about random clashes reminiscent of previous “yard to yard” fights - we are talking about a war that drags on the masses. And here all sorts of peacekeeping missions with the introduction of friendly troops armed with friendly weapons only fuel the hostile mood.

The EU readily accepts information in the form in which the United States presents it; the European Union, apparently, has neither the time nor the initiative to investigate. Like a bull to a red rag, the leaders of the European Union will react to the slightest movement by the United States towards military action against Russia.

This will give the Chinese government, which has been restraining itself for a long time, a reason to talk. The stagnation of American troops in the Pacific region has long been poisoning the existence of the patient Chinese, whose hand is already tired of trembling over the nuclear button. Israel's reaction is also predictable - the long-awaited nod of consent from the United States will allow them to attack Tehran, but how long Israel itself will survive after this is a big question. The last salvos on Iraq will hardly have time to die down before the Libyan, Omani, Yemeni and (where would we be without them) Egyptian bombs will simply sweep away the hapless aggressor.

Anyone else curious about the start date of World War III? Then we discuss further.

A look from the outside - how it will be

It is useful to listen to what retired Colonel General Anatoly Lopata, former Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and First Deputy Minister of Defense of Ukraine, thinks about the events, scary to say, coming. Looking ahead, we note that the former Secretary of Defense's remark about the location of the future battlefield completely coincides with the opinion of British Air Force Colonel Ian Shields.

When asked by journalists what World War III essentially is and when it will begin, Anatoly Lopata calmly explained that the war is in full swing and the aggressor country in it is called - who do you think? - of course, Russia. And even in relation to America, at least in the fact that it responds with sympathy to the Assad regime in Syria (!). At the same time, the Colonel General admits that the United States is forced to reckon with the Russian Federation and this will remain unchanged, due to the latter’s enormous economic and military potential.

The date of the start of the Third World War, according to the expert, thus belongs to the distant past, but its development to the scale of epic battles belongs to the future, which we still have to live to see. Anatoly Lopata even shared a mysterious figure - 50. In his opinion, it is after this number of years that warring powers will collide in the vast expanses of space.

Analysts' forecasts

Joachim Hagopian, known since 2015, warned that the recruitment of “friends” by the countries of the USA and Russia is not accidental. China and India will follow Russia in any case, and the EU countries will have no choice but to accept America’s policies. For Korea, Hagopian predicted military neutrality in relation to both powers, but a rather violent internecine war with the likelihood of the activation of nuclear charges. It can be assumed that the day when the powerful weapon is activated is the date the Third World War began.

Alexander Richard Schiffer, an interesting personality and former head of NATO, in his book: “2017: War with Russia,” predicted the defeat of the United States due to financial collapse, followed by the collapse of the American army.

Vladimir Zhirinovsky, as always, is unambiguous and says what the majority is delicately silent about. He is confident that America will not begin any open action until all the countries involved in the military conflict squabble among themselves to the point of collapse, and, exhausted, lay down what remains of their weapons. Then the US will magnanimously gather the dejected losers and emerge as the sole winner.

Sergei Glazyev, Advisor to the President of the Russian Federation, proposes to create a coalition that does not fundamentally support military policy against Russia. According to him, the number of countries that are officially ready to speak out in favor of abandoning armed conflict will be such that America will simply be forced to curb its appetites.

As Vanga believed

Vanga, the most famous Bulgarian seer, either could not or did not want to predict the date of the beginning of the Third World War. In order not to confuse minds with specifics, the clairvoyant only said that she sees religious strife around the world as the cause of the war. Drawing a parallel with current events, we can assume that the date of the start of the Third World War, which Vanga never predicted, falls during the period of terrorist acts of the ISIS group disguised as offended religious feelings.

Using exact dates

How can we not mention the world-famous American Horatio Villegas, whose vision of fiery spheres striking the earth from the sky became a sensation in 2015. Adapting completely materialistic tasks to the act of clairvoyance, Horatio hastened to announce that he knew the date of the start of the Third World War - 05/13/2017. It is with regret or great joy that we note that no one was able to observe the fireballs on May 13th.

We can only hope that people who were expecting big events in March 2017 were not too upset when they lost confirmation of the words of astrologer Vlad Ross. Let us recall that this person also named the date of the beginning of the Third World War - 03/26/2017, which did not find a response in reality.

The most dangerous period for Russia will come in the early 2020s, when the technological rearmament of developed countries and China begins, and the United States and other Western countries emerge from the depression of 2008–2018. and make a new technological leap.

The risks of a third world war will persist until the US leadership abandons its claims to global dominance. Along with the Ukrainian hotbed of inciting a global chaotic war, the United States continues to support armed conflicts in Syria and Iraq, destabilize the situation in the Near and Middle East, prepare the invasion of the Taliban and Islamic militants in Central Asia, project “color revolutions” in Russia and other countries of Eurasian integration, and also organize coups d'etat in Latin American countries that have escaped Washington's control. The United States is being pushed toward a world war by objective patterns of global economic and political dynamics. Their understanding makes it possible to predict military-political activity for the next decade.

An analysis of economic and political dynamics shows that the most likely period of major regional military conflicts involving the United States and its satellites against Russia is 2015-2018.
This is the period when a new technological structure emerges from the birth phase into the growth phase, when the formation of its technological trajectory is completed and the modernization of the economy on its basis begins. It was during this period that technological shifts entail changes in the structure of international relations. Countries that jumped on the wave of growth of a new technological order earlier than others are gaining competitive advantages in the world market and are beginning to squeeze out the former leaders, who have to make great efforts to overcome the crisis of overaccumulation of capital in outdated production and technological structures. A struggle is unfolding between new and old leaders of technical and economic development for dominance in the world market, which leads to increased international tension and provokes military-political conflicts that have so far led to world wars. It is precisely this period that is beginning now, which will last until 2020-2022, when the structure of the new technological order is finally formed, and the world economy will enter a phase of sustainable growth based on it.

...It should be noted that the Ukrainian crisis began earlier than the forecast estimate.

If Yanukovych had signed an association agreement with the EU in November, then everything would have happened a year and a half later, at the time of the next presidential elections.
By that time, the mechanisms provided for by this agreement for managing the economic, foreign and defense policies of Ukraine on the part of the EU would have started working. The Ukrainian-Polish-Lithuanian battalions that are currently being formed would have already been created and deployed on the borders with Russia. Procedures for joint actions of European and Ukrainian armed forces in resolving regional conflicts would be worked out. Although the agreement provides for Ukraine's obligation to act in these conflicts under the leadership of the EU, as well as to follow its foreign and defense policies, it is clear that the actual organization of military operations will be handled by NATO under the leadership of Washington.

There is no doubt that at the time of the presidential elections in the spring of 2015, the same technologies would have been used to replace Yanukovych with a US protege as during the coup d'etat last winter. Only the change of power would be carried out in a relatively legitimate way, which would exclude Russian interference in Ukrainian affairs, not to mention reunification with Crimea. The government and security forces in Kyiv, formed by the Americans from their agents, would set a course for Ukraine’s accession to NATO and the ousting of the Russian Black Sea Fleet from Crimea. Russia would be opposed not by Nazi gangs, but by completely legitimate Ukrainian-European military contingents, backed by the entire military might of NATO. A legitimate Ukrainian government directed by the United States would break off cooperation with Russia in the defense industry, begin an anti-Russian campaign in the media no less rabid than now, and forcefully Ukrainize the South-East of Ukraine. Russia would find itself in a much worse position than it is now: after reunification with Crimea and the establishment of the Nazi regime in Kyiv, whose illegitimacy and criminal actions doom Ukraine to disaster and collapse.

Of course, the socio-economic catastrophe that has engulfed Ukraine and the growing chaos in this territory do not meet the interests of Russia, for which Ukraine has been and remains an integral part of the Russian world, connected with the Russian Federation technologically, economically and spiritually. The catastrophic scenario could have been avoided if Yanukovych had not followed the lead of American and European emissaries, defended the state from the Nazi rebellion and prevented a coup d'etat. However, for the United States, this would be tantamount to defeat in the long anti-Russian campaign that they waged in Ukraine throughout the entire post-Soviet period. Therefore, everything possible and impossible was done with the involvement of gigantic political, information and financial resources to organize a coup in Kyiv with the transfer of power over Ukraine to pro-American agents of influence. Yes, for this adventure - if Russia carries out a competent and decisive defense of itself and the world from the American policy of unleashing a chaotic world war - the United States risks paying with its ideological and political leadership. But, apparently, “Paris is worth a mass” - American policy, in pursuit of maximum geostrategic “profit,” has ceased to take into account the associated risks.

In 2017, a new election cycle will begin in the United States, which, apparently, will be implicated in Russophobia as the ideological basis of the coming world war.
By that time, the crisis state of the American financial system may manifest itself in a reduction in budget expenditures, a depreciation of the dollar, and a noticeable deterioration in the standard of living of the population. US external aggression may bog down in the Near and Middle East and fail in Afghanistan and Iraq. The pressure of internal problems and crises in foreign policy, on the one hand, will provoke an increase in the aggressiveness of the American leadership, and on the other hand, will weaken its position. But in the case of intellectual, economic and military mobilization, Russia has a chance not to lose in the conflicts of 2015-2018, since the United States and its satellites will not yet be ready for open aggression.

But in the period 2021–2025. Russia may again fall sharply behind technologically and economically, which will devalue its defense potential and sharply intensify internal social and interethnic conflicts, as happened with the USSR in the late 1980s.

American analysts from the CIA and other agencies are directly betting on the collapse of Russia from within after 2020.
This will happen, in their opinion, due to internal social and interethnic conflicts initiated from the outside using problems of social and regional inequality, as well as a decline in the standard of living of the population of our country.

For these purposes, the United States is consistently cultivating its “fifth column” among the Russian political, business and intellectual elite, allocating, according to some estimates, up to $10 billion a year for these purposes. The same is evidenced by the recent appointment of the most famous organizer of “color revolutions” and coups d’etat in the post-Soviet space, John Tefft, as the new US Ambassador to Russia.

To avoid the implementation of the most negative scenario for Russia, leading to the collapse of the country, a systematic internal and external policy is needed to strengthen national security, ensure economic independence, increase international competitiveness and accelerated development of the national economy, mobilize society and modernize the defense industry. By 2017, when the new technological order enters a growth phase and the struggle for world leadership reaches its maximum intensity, the Russian army must have modern and effective weapons, Russian society must be united and self-confident, and the Russian intellectual elite must possess new technologies. , the Russian economy is on the wave of growth of a new technological order, and Russian politics and diplomacy are to organize a broad anti-war coalition of countries that are not interested in starting a new world war and are capable of stopping American aggression through concerted action.

Such an international coalition is needed not only to prevent war, but also to win it if war turns out to be inevitable.
An anti-war coalition could include:

European countries that are being drawn into a war against Russia contrary to their national interests;

BRICS countries, whose economic recovery may be torpedoed by US-organized global destabilization;

Korea, the countries of Indochina, which are not interested in worsening relations with Russia;

Countries of the Near and Middle East, for which a world war will mean an escalation of their own regional conflicts;

Latin American countries of the Bolivarian Alliance, for which the outbreak of a new world war means a direct US invasion;

Developing countries of the Group of 77, heirs of the Movement of Non-Aligned Countries, traditionally opposed to wars and for a just world order.

The motivating reason for creating such a coalition should be the threat common to all its participants of the US unleashing a global chaotic war. An important condition for the successful creation of such a coalition, as noted above, is depriving the United States of its monopoly on ideological dominance by consistently exposing the inhumane consequences of its interventions, the massacres of civilians committed by its military personnel, and the destructive results of the rule of American proxies in various countries.

It is necessary to destroy the image of American infallibility, to expose the cynicism and deception on the part of American leaders, the catastrophic consequences of their policy of double standards, the incompetence and ignorance of American officials and politicians.

Religious organizations that oppose the inculcation of the cult of permissiveness and debauchery, the undermining of family and other universal values ​​could become influential allies in creating an anti-war coalition. They would help the coalition participants develop and offer the world a new unifying ideology based on the restoration of the immutable moral limits of human arbitrariness. International humanitarian and anti-fascist organizations could play a constructive role. An ally could be the global scientific and expert community, speaking from the standpoint of sustainable development and generating development projects that unite humanity.

The actions of the anti-war coalition should be aimed not only at exposing and destroying the political dominance of the United States, but also, above all, at undermining American military-political power based on the issuance of the dollar as a world currency. If the US continues its aggressive actions to incite a world war, they must include a renunciation of the use of the dollar in mutual trade and of dollar instruments for the placement of its gold and foreign exchange assets.

The anti-war coalition must develop a positive program for organizing the global financial and economic architecture on the principles of mutual benefit, justice and respect for national sovereignty.
We have already discussed above the necessary measures for this purpose for financial stabilization, increasing the efficiency of regulation of the financial market, banking, financial and investment institutions, stimulating the growth of a new technological order and progressive structural changes, and the formation of relevant new institutions. They must address the fundamental causes of the global crisis.